Comparing this mod to using a wideband injection transformer, the output amplitude and source impedance of the isolated AWG is flat across the specified frequency, whereas the best injection transformer still struggles at the lower and upper frequency ranges (see the post linked above). Depending on the isolator used, the isolation capacitance can also be much lower when compared. My two injection transformer measured 54pF and 228pF, whereas my USB isolator measured 16pF, much lower.
Then I tried using the isolated AWG to measure the loop response of a buck converter (TPS54561EVM-555), comparing the isolated AWG vs signal generator with injection transformer. For the same amplitude profile, the bode plot at low frequency has a much cleaner result, as the AWG does not suffer from core saturation at low frequency, limiting the strength of the injection signal at the low end.
One thing to note, compared to the eval board manual, the bode plot looks quite different at lower frequencies. I suspect this is a goof on TI's side, using a DC load instead of a real resistor as the load. A CCM buck with type 2 compensator should have a pole at origin and have a negative slope at close to DC, by my calculations, the TIA in the converter chip should provide enough DC gain to not have a flat gain until 100Hz.
Anyways, I think I'll design a 3d printed case to house the isolator and AWG in a nice insulated package. This simple hack should prove quite useful for power converter development.
Not sure why my photos are not showing up as expandable thumbnails
