The closest thing I can relate this to are cars. Cars have dealerships for the same reason service, support spares and other BS. Look at what Tesla is doing, they sell direct - Now was that so difficult? NO
That's why I said so about dealerships. They are a relic of a bygone era when post and landline telephones where the best means to communicate.
Here in the US, every state has laws requiring that cars be sold through franchised dealers, not directly from the manufacturer. These laws exist because car dealers are wealthy and can afford to donate to political campaigns. Every time there are pushes to eliminate those laws, the dealers dump money into campaigns and they make dire predictions: "Car dealerships are major local employers! If you eliminate us, all of those jobs are lost!" That's self-serving bullshit, of course. The
owners of the dealerships lose, and that's all they care about.
Of course, back in that bygone era, franchised dealers might have made sense, but now they're just in the way. There is no reason for a car dealer as such to exist. I want to buy my next car from Costco. I am not kidding. The manufacturers can set up company-owned repair/maintenance shops and also offer franchise options for independent shops (basically the shops can pay for a nice plaque and direct access to the factory for parts and documentation).
Today it isnt. TE companies would sell a lot more equipment if they reduce the price. Educational institutions to enthusiasts to industry. This seems like a like a chicken or egg problem but it isn't. Companies have to swallow their ego and bid adieu to distributors and focus on selling direct.
Reducing the price? Are you in a business that manufactures specialist equipment? Do you know the margins and the overhead? Doubtful.
(Aside: this forum always baffles me. It claims to have a large audience of professional engineers -- that is, people whose work results in products sold. So these professionals understand things like "overhead" and "BOM cost" and what it takes to run a business, and all of that goes into their products' selling prices. Yet there are people on this forum saying "they need to reduce the price" (or worse, ask for hacks and workarounds for software licenses). And right away this is what tells me whether someone is a professional or a pretender/hobbyist. Yes, we all want products to cost less. But we also want the best performance out of those products,
and we want the supplier to remain in business to support the product. So pick two.)
Selling through distributors is a separate issue. At least here in the US, they're already doing that. Right now in another browser tab I have the Keysight oscilloscope page open. I clicked on "BUY NOW" and it's in my cart and if I give them my credit card number they'll happily send me a nice 'scope. Tektronix is the same. Fluke, too.
I bought a Rigol power supply through distribution (Saelig) since Rigol does not sell direct. That's likely because they're not big enough to do their own worldwide distribution.
Man is a tool-making and tool-using animal. He just needs tools to make more tools!
So which toolmakers deserve to make a living from their work, and which do not? This is the question you are asking.