• EEVblog #56 – Agilent U1253A OLED Multimeter Review & Teardown

    Dave reviews the Agilent U1253A OLED Multimeter and compares it with the Fluke 87-V in this epic review. How will it stack up?

    Check out Stormbyte’s video response to my review.
    Some good points here which I address in #57.

    Be Sociable, Share!

      About EEVblog

      Check Also

      EEVblog #1056 – Digilent Open Scope MZ Review

      Dave looks at the Digilent Open Scope MZ Review, an $89 open source oscilloscope, logic ...

      • Andrew

        8 hour battery life really sucks – device should come with a dock so its always charged when needed.

      • Jan

        Disagree that you can tell something about the quality depending on what county something is made in. It all depends on what quality standards the customer sets and how he controls it.
        If that wouldn’t work then Malayisa wasn’t one of the main producers for pc harddrives. I think there is no other product with comparable quality standards.
        Its no problem to produce crap in high price level countries. just look at us car companies.

        • TrentO

          Totally agree with that “Jan” guy– us Americans totally suck at producing things. We had to give up producing our own rubber dog-poo in the late 1920’s…

        • Disagree that you can tell something about the quality depending on what county something is made in. It all depends on what quality standards the customer sets and how he controls it.

          I wasn’t implying that made in Malaysia is inherently crap, nor made in China. You can get world class products out of either (or any) country. I’m just sick and tired of seeing stuff made in China and other Asian countries. I just want to see something produced somewhere else as a point of differentiation with the all-too-common “outsourced to Asia” mentality.

          • TrentO

            Hey Dave,

            I’m somewhat confused by your strong thumbs-up rating, given what are significant shortcomings. Eight hours of battery life, unreadable in sunlight, less than stellar (apparent) durability– this Agilent unit doesn’t seem to be suitable for potentially critical field-use.

            Perhaps you could present the following scenarios in your review of the ‘B’ model–

            1. Would NASA be well served by this unit on the International Space Station, where resources and replenishment are limited (no neighborhood drug-store w/ 9v batteries.)

            2. Would a combat EOD (explosive ordinance disposal) team be well served by this unit, disarming roadside bombs in mountains of Afghanistan (where, needing to go back to the truck for another tool might be fatal?)

            3. Would a medical equipment servicing organization be well served by this unit, as they attempt to revitalize life saving equipment in earthquake stricken Haiti?

            After watching your video, I would say that the reviewed Agilent unit would not necessarily be the best choice for the above scenarios. I’m confident that you, and many others would not hesitate to recommend the Fluke 87-V for any of the above. Not that the majority of your viewers would find themselves in such circumstances, but I would guess that there are quite a few that work in less than clean-room conditions (i.e.: electricians who ‘toss’ their DMM’s into that 20L bucket after each wall-socket installation.)

            The Agilent certainly has that “Neat-o!” factor, no doubt. However, I believe that for a field unit, reliability and repeatability are the #1 and #2 requirements respectively. The ‘gadgetry’ factor…. #3 at best.

            Great stuff, keep up the good work.


            • Rubi

              Special equipment for special scenarios.

              But this scenarios have nothing to do with the daily engineers labwork for which this meter was designed for.

              If a great meter fails at your given scenarios, so what ?

              • TrentO

                The point is the Fluke stuff *IS* special enough for these “special scenarios.” That’s the beauty of it! The Agilent, as reviewed, perhaps needs to mature a bit more for the marketplace. I would guess that’s why a ‘B’ model exists so soon. This isn’t to say that the Fluke stuff is immune to this– the 87-V is revision-level five….

                Design engineers should spend some time in the field once in a while.

            • I

              • TrentO


                Although it would be fair to base your thumbs up on “thinking beyond my own needs,” but honestly, that is not what you’re known for– IMHO, in your previous reviews, the product had to pass the stringent “David L. Jones Sniff Test(R).” This has always been a very narrow (but objective) determination of whether or not something meets the stated or inherent design objective(s.) As I think most EEVBlog fans here can agree that, when it comes to meters, we have come to expect certain minimums from David L. Jones. I, for one, fully expect to see you intentionally drop your 87-V to the floor as some point, to illustrate the absolute confidence you have in that particular model Fluke– the David L. Jones reference unit, so to speak. It’s rather infrequent that we would hear “I wish my Fluke had this or that feature.” So it was very surprising to me to hear you describe the major deficiencies of the Aglient unit as it could be compared to the Fluke, then wrap up with a completely positive tone. I am not an EE by trade, but the trade off of ‘neat-o’ OLED and super-resolution to the basic field-DMM requirements does not seem appropriate. And definitely not very David L. Jones-like. Yes, I do consider you to be somewhat of a brand, similar to Coca-cola or Pepsi. We have come to see, know, and (perhaps unfortunately) expect a certain David L. Jones (R), and this is the ONLY time where I was left thinking “???” at the end of the segment for anything other than technical limitations (on my part.) I guess this is why I am so critical of your thumbs-up in this instance– it goes against my understanding of the EEVBlog, and by extension the EE disciplines as a multi-meter totin’ professional-wannabe.

                I love your work. I really do. But oddly, this episode felt like my favorite TV show going to pot because of the Screen Writer’s Guild Strike. But unlike LOST, it remains likely that I will continue to enjoy your series. Please don’t kill off any major characters.

                Also, to put it in modern parlance– WTF does “people are spitting the dummy left right and center!” mean? I think I understand, based on context, but Wikipedia comes up dry as well.

                I apologize for the rant. I’ve always been this way.



                • @Trent and others
                  Perhaps my next video will make it all a bit clearer… (or maybe not, we’ll see…)
                  Having a few technical problems at the moment uploading, so it’ll be up in the next day I hope.

                  But to try and answer your specific(?) question now, I’d have to say nothing is ever cut and dry, and there is essentially no be-all end-all master list of “inherent design objectives” that an instrument must meet in order to be recommended.
                  Engineering opinion can be cut and dry, but it can also be warm and fuzzy too.
                  If an instrument fails one “inherent design objective” (battery life), does that make it useless for all tasks? How about two things? Do they all carry the same weight?
                  No instrument is ever perfect for all people and all situations, and sometimes I take this into account a lot and sometimes less so depending upon my mood, my “feel” for the instrument, and other intangible aspects (like this being an Agilent brand for instance).

                  Yes, some features of the Agilent meter didn’t pass my “sniff test” and I said so, but a LOT of them did, people seem to forget the positive aspects.
                  That means the meter is going to perform well, and I think will be a very useful and valuable product for some people, just not everyone. That’s why I qualified my thumbs up, but in hindsight I should have done that better.

                  Make no mistake, I gave it an overall thumbs up because in the end, even with the faults, I still found that I actually *LIKED* the meter, end of story!
                  If people get the impression that I don’t ever think beyond my own needs and stubborn opinionated views (like my obsession with battery life), then they have it completely wrong. Life is surprising sometimes…
                  And, sadly the video editing process often cuts out lots of lead-up and post qualifying remarks, so things can easily be taken in a way not entirely intended.


                  • Firstly, the Agilent U1253A is an exceptional Multimeter! But as anybody, I also have problems with very low autonomy and after much grief with the low battery life, I decided to seek a solution to the”problem”with the U1253A.
                    Among the numerous searches, I came to the conclusion that the best solution would be to use three CR2 lithium batteries 3V in series. The three CR2 batteries fit perfectly in place of the 9V battery, I’m very pleased because the result was excellent and autonomy was higher than 4x,, hugs to all. BEST REGARDS.

                    Silvano de Oliveira Fernandes – PCB DESIGNER
                    SITE : http://www.vertex.kit.net
                    E-mail: [email protected]
                    MSN : [email protected]
                    SKYPE: silvano.de.oliveira

                    • @Silvano
                      I agree, it’s an exceptional meter. People who complain about the very poor battery life of the OLED version just don’t realise there is an identical LCD version, the U1252A/B

          • TheEENerd

            Well u probably have no complaints if everything is made in Australia.

        • Brims

          Go buy a Toyota if you think US car companies suck. Oops, looks like US cars are looking preety good now.

          • Sean

            Unfortunately in the current recall it is an American made part that doesn’t match the original design specs of the Japanese manufactured part. And my truck was assembled in San Antonio, Texas from a mixture of American and Japanese parts. If we were doing our part, we wouldn’t have this situation.

      • Tissues to Dave’s lab, Tissues to Dave’s lab….

        When I first looked at the meter on the Farnell email (IIRC) I just about burnt the plastic card and ordered one on the spot, I love the OLED display…

        But since seeing the review I am a little disappointed, The continuity test is far to slow, the display appears useless outside, I do not like the battery life.

        If they just improved battery life and continuity speed, I would buy one tomorrow. I can live with the fact I need to use a different meter outside (I hardly work outside these days anyway (far to Hot in Perth for outside jobs….)

        I also have a problem with the display flicker when used over video. I have used this idea over 100 times, set the meter up in one part of a building then used the CCTV (with an extention cable etc to move the camera into position) to monitor voltages etc when I did not want to be in the area while powering up repaired equipment (I used to repair industrial UPS’s. It was hard to bench test modules as a UPS might cost au$250K or more, we had test jigs, but they did not create the true life situations (like DC Buss ripple etc) that could cause things to go bang (and in big power electronics they go bang very well (esp when some dick head (related to Mr Head from Microchip) slips with a wrench and puts it across the 500Vdc battery buss (hmm how much current does a 1.2Ka breaker pass before tripping ;))

        BTW Dave, remember in the world of video left and right are revered for the viewer 😉

        GREAT BLOG I was riveted for the entire video.. BUT I am a Geekette 😉



        • BTW Dave, remember in the world of video left and right are revered for the viewer

          Yeah, oops! My mind got scrambled viewing it on the flipped monitor when I filmed it. Couldn’t be bothered doing another take!
          I was going to add text to post-fix, but figured that would make me look even stupider!

      • Brian Hoskins

        I’m sold to be honest Dave – your review came across mostly in a positive light for me. I did agree with most if not all of the criticisms you made of it actually, and in particular I’d definitely agree that the PP3 was a very poor battery choice, but at least you don’t have to take the thing out to charge it. There’s some convenience with the in-situ charger, so you could probably just leave the thing on overnight. It’d just have to become a forced habit.

        So yeah, I’d buy one I think. Over here in the UK Farnell are offering them for

      • Brian Hoskins


        There are not enough Geekettes in this world. Plus, you’re lucky because being a geekette automatically qualifies you for the title “uber-cool”, where as being a regular geek automatically qualifies us for “uber-unpopular” 😉


      • Did you end up measuring the battery life with the OLED turned down?

        What’s the maximum battery battery life during data logging? (can the display be completely turned off?)

        • The review was already too long, so I ditched the usual battery tests. Figured I’d do it on the next B series model in a few weeks time.

      • Why would they not go with the tried and true Li-ion battery tech used in the mobile device industry? Heck, the battery bay looks big enough to stuff a 900mAh LiPo RC battery into as-is.

        Also, if you had to guess, is it just a simple matter of programming to resolve the continuity test beep delay, or is there some real reason for the delay. (IE the slow continuity test is the result of an EE choosing some other unknown benefit)

      • Prad

        You’re the man Dave. What a review! I am sure the chairperson at Agilent was biting nails for this.
        I am disappointed. In a whim to shake Fluke’s throne, Agilent produced a PROFESSIONAL TOP-OF-THE-LINE 400USD product that sound like VIDEO GAMES OF THE 1990s? Even the built aesthetics are sub par Fluke 117!
        The battery life and display readability must be better with the two lower models in this series, so that is not something to tear your hairs off. One thing you did not mention is the warranty period. It does not come with lifetime warranty, does it?
        What is awesome is the accuracy and super fast display update. Hats off to the processor.
        Substantially, Fluke 287/289 remains undefeated!

      • Dave,
        Great review! I love the hardware reviews the most. I’m glad I have the Fluke v87 more then ever. I like the display on the Agilent but it’s not worth the negatives at all. I’ll keep my Fluke thank you very much just the same.

        PS: I got your 555 t-shirt for Christmas. It was an XL size but I guess down-under your XL is more like a USA M. 🙁 Still loved it, but had to give it to my teenage nephew. My wife said its a standard Hanse XL so maybe I eat to much turkey? 😉

      • Steven

        Good review.
        I agree about the battery, there couldn’t possibly be worse that the old 9V type. I detest them.
        A rechargeable lithium mobile phone style battery would do well, as used in most portable devices with fast processors and dot matrix oled/lcd displays.
        I’d have to say it’s more of a ‘lab / engineer’s multimeter and not the most practical for the electrician.

      • Curtisbeef

        Why is there not a Open Source Multimeter yet. You would think with all the EE people who use them that someone would have developed a Uber-Cool feature packed Hackable Multimeter that is super accurate that uses standard off the shelf type parts. Even if its not pretty and in plastic with a nice Dial would still be cool.

        • Hi Curtis,

          I was actually looking a while back about designing a basic 5000 count meter with off the shelf parts (not cheap to buy in ones and twos for decent spec op amps, resistors for dividers etc etc etc)

          I guess I might go back to the idea, it was for a bench style meter (as it is easier to get the case and more room).

          If there is enough interest here, I might knock up a quick circuit and we can peer review it on the forum and do it as a community project, I am ok with design and PCB layout, but I am CRAP at Firmware 😉

          What the Hell 😉 I will start a topic 😉 http://www.eevblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=173.0



      • Qaim

        Could you please use something else than a highly conductive screwdriver (when poking around the insides of a device) in your next ‘tear it a part’-review?

        • TrentO

          …and use that ESD grounding wrist strap. And safety glasses. And reference the MSDS datasheets. And no food/drink or smoking while touching lead-based solder. Oh…oh…oh…and emphasize to the audience that mixing an acid and a base could get you expelled from school….

          Give me a F’ing break.

      • Brian Hoskins

        For those concerned about battery life, the Agilent 1250-series does include some models without the OLED display, and battery life with these models is significantly better. The U1252A appears (at a brief glance of the specs) to be comparable with the reviewed U1253A in every way except that it uses a standard LCD display and has a battery life of 36 hours compared to the OLED model’s 8. The U1251A is a slightly less functional model, but still a good meter, and also sports a standard LCD display with a battery life of 72 hours.

        So, if battery life and direct sun-light operation are higher priorities for you than the OLED display then there are options for you within the range.


      • Rubi

        8 Hour Battery live

        David today there are much better 9V batteries available. They got lipoly inside. The power of the lithium ion! And they are available in the case of a 9V battery.


        But you can even build them yoursel.
        I crack open old 9V batteries and solder 2 Lipolys to the tabs.The 9V NiMh batteries were allways the worst batteries I have ever seen.They simply had no capacity.

        To make a long story short, a replacement should give you at least 40hrs live time.

        Drawback you could not use the builtin charge anymore, but you can quick charge them with 2C in 30 minutes.

        Would I buy such a multimeter, immedeatly, if I would live in America. In Austria they are much more expensive, about 700$.

        • TrentO

          So in addition to your Agilent DMM w/custom-made LiPO batteries, you need a LiPo battery charger– the R/C industry offers them for about $150 U.S. for a decent one, a 12v power supply (to power the battery charger) and a custom balancing pigtail to accommodate the two cells wired in series as proposed by Rubi (total additional weight, about 3kg.) I don’t know about the rest of you, but that doesn’t seem all that practical to me.

          Also– custom LiPo battery packs are ‘iffy’ at best; contained in little foil sacks, any damage during construction/handling could result in fire.

          All to get that jazzy OLED experience (actual rewards may vary, depending on the amount of ambient light during operation.)

          • Rubi


            For a simmilar application,I designed my own lipo loader , using a Maxim 1555 (in this case it would be tow of them or a Lipo loader chip from TI).

            The beauty, you can load via usb.

            Weight about 10g, cost 10$.

            The loader you mention are high capacity laders.You dont need a 300W loader capable to load 10 cells in series for this little repacement battery.

      • TrentO

        I’ve noticed over the years that there’s always that ONE over eager company-guy that pretends to be an “anonymous” user, and goes way-overboard defending the product and company on these Internet forums.

        Aglient should seek out sh*t-can those guys.

      • Newton

        I would expect that a $500 dollar multimeter would have a battery that lasts more or at least the same of one with no OLed display.
        OLed are more power demanding ? Well.. Put a big Lithium battery on the thing…
        Oh.. The meter will end up being too heavy.. So what ?… We engineers are sedentary bastards! We need the exercise :-))

      • fox

        response to your video Dave its just a BS!
        in my opinion, your review was really objective, those things sucks, and those are cool.
        this is slow and this is fast.

        i watch your review and i realize some features are not too fast.
        who cares, how often you use continuity test. and as you said you can use different mode to check it and fast enough.
        lets face it, electronics design its not F1 race, or speed contest.

        for my purposes its perfect.
        battery life…. bla bla bla . please, guys you suppose to do electronics stuff. what is the problem to change battery, make additional slot for charging, plug power supply.
        have mercy. how often you take your multimeter outside and for how long ???

        and why multimeter isn’t bulletproof ?? why it should be?
        cars seems to be more solid than multimeters? right?
        try to drop your car from 1 – 1.5 meters 😀
        cmon, its a piece of shit, because it fall a part. please mercy.
        my 5 cents



        • Fox,

          Actually I take my meter outside most days, for 8 years it was used in marine electronics, working on very sunny decks, bridges, engine rooms, anywhere electronic equipment or junction boxes were placed.

          Most of the work was voltage related, ie measuring circuits to fault find sensor, motor etc circuits.

          About 10% of my work was install, 90% of the work was fault finding (the electricians did most of the install, Us engineers did the fault finding and commissioning 😉

          I would be either charging it or praying it would hold out for a 10-16 hour day 🙁 (Yes self employed people do seem to work very long hours)



      • Qno

        Hi Dave,

        It looks to me that the meter is designed an build in Malaysia. Too much menus. The buttons and the text is a mess. Its more like a Phone than a professional multimeter.
        The OLED is a marketing trick. It takes way to much power. That is why the battery is empty all the time. Remember the LED watches in the 70’ties. They where scrapped when the LCD came along with a battery life of a year iso 3 weeks.

        The innards say Malaysia to me. Dry solder joint should not pass the final inspection and the headers between the PCB’s are prone to fail after a few drops. Every electrical engineer should know that the the most unreliable component on a PCB is a socket or a header.
        The protective boot is a colorful fashion accessory but does not protect the meter.

        The continuity us useless.
        The probes are standard. I have seen them before. They are now supplied by many multimeter manufacturers and after marked suppliers.
        The Overload protection is probably done with PTC’s that take a while to cool down. This is a risk when you do not notice overloading it and trust the display of meter. The display should indicate that is still recovering from an overload and the value is unreliable. Even better would be to display nothing at all.
        I do not trust current spec’s of 0.15%.
        Try measuring current in the highest range say 5A and keep the current constant. Check the display after 10 minutes. I bet it has run off more than 0.15%

        This is a meter made by people who do NOT use a multimeter every day. They have analyzed the competition and try to trump every spec of the competitor leaving usability on the track.

      • joe mcdermott

        A few comments.

        People seem to attribute battery life problems to the OLED display. I’m not so sure. I have a Zune HD music player with OLED and the battery life is excellent.

        OLED displays are worthless outdoors. The Zune is unreadable in bright sunlight.
        But few need a precision multimeter outside. I use a cheap LCD Radioshack for that purpose.

        A think that Dave is unfairly criticized. He clearly gave thumbs up based on the exquisite precision of the meter. If you do not need that spec why would you spend $450 for a meter?

        By the way, this really is not a portable meter – it is a bench meter in disguise. That’s what Agilent, formerly HP, is famous for.

        Most likely some MBA marketing manager dickhead forced the enineers to make it “portable” 🙂 See Dave’s review of the Pickit 3 for a lively discussion of the “DH” issue.

      • Mellowman

        I have the DMM and it suits me pretty well. I use it for hobby purposes and then the battery lasts a week or two depending on how much I use it. I have two 9v batteries and I don’t charge them in the multimeter but instead use an ordinary plug-in charger. The meter has only been used indoors for electronics so far.

        The slow buzzer is most probably due to the sluggish auto-ranging. One can set the beep threshold (roughly) while most other meters seem to have analog buzzers that are quick but the resistance can’t be set.

        I opened my DMM after seeing the blog to check for cold solder joints but I did not find any (Although I didn’t inspect it carefully with any microscope/loupe). The shielding foil looks cheap but there doesn’t seem to be enough space to use a proper sheet metal one. The same goes for the piezo buzzer that isn’t board mounted like in the other meters reviewed here.

        The software for data logging is free (unlike fluke’s really expensive) and the usb cable is dirt cheap. Another thing that was not mentioned is that it comes with a full calibration report which might be nice to have.

        The main shortcomings are the slow auto ranging and the 9v battery but the latter does not bother me too much

      • I just have to say Stormbyte

      • TrentO

        Let’s not turn it into a ‘three-dog night’ for Dave!

        Thanks, man. Keep up the good work!

      • fox


        i dint know what exactly are you checking on those boats.
        but i guess precision isn’t really important in this case.

        I’m using cheap multimeter i think i paid 15 euros 😀
        and i have to say thumb up !
        its better to use multimeter than touch the cables buy your hand and check if there is power or not 🙂
        works and it does the job really well. also for low voltage.

        my point here is:
        there is no universal hammer, if you go to the store and take look, you will see lots of them.
        and im pretty sure you will pick up one what will suit your job. of course you could use sledge hammer to hang a picture frame on the wall. but it might be quite difficult 😀

        in this twisted way im trying to explain, you dont need to have the best multimeter in entire galaxy. because you won’t use all those features.

        you need multimeter what will have those features/speed/precision what you actually need.

        this multimeter had serious issues, as the battery life, i have to agree… totally sux.
        continuity time sux.

        but beside those things its really cool.

      • Michael

        It might also be worth pointing out that the two meters (the Fluke 87v and Agilent U1253A) are aimed at very different merket segments.

        The fluke is extremely rugged because it’s designed to be used by industrial electricians or engineers.

        The Agilent meter, on the other hand, is targeted squarely at electronic engineers, where better accuracy and a different feature set are more valuable.

        As an example, the true-RMS bandwidth on the Fluke meter is only 20kHz, and then only to the 6V range. Realistically, the usable analog bandwidth is only 1kHz. While that’s fine for testing AC motors and the like, it’s complete rubbish for testing a high power DC-DC converter.

        The Agilent has a usable analog bandwidth of 20kHz to the 50V range, and suffers only a minor accuracy loss when used at 100kHz on the 500V range.

        Basically, which meter is “better” will depend entirely on your requirements. For me, as a power electronics engineer, the Agilent is clearly superior as the Fluke would spend most of its time lying to me.

        • @ Michael
          Yes, they are designed for different market segments, and I was really only using the Fluke 87 as my standard baseline for some feature comparisons (not all). In real terms it would be fairer to compare the Agilent to the Fluke 289, but I don’t actually own one of those. But even then, comparison aren’t always valid, the final analysis is always going to be based on individual needs.

      • fox

        please do not change anything. i really like all your reviews.
        you point all bad things, as well as a good things.
        and at the end you say how you feel about the product.
        this is the perfect way.

        thats why people like so much your blog. its because who you are, and how you talking about stuff.

        be your self

        cheers mate !


      • Andrew

        I don’t know why so many shit their pants because of Dave’s thumbs-up summary.

        This is a blog, Dave’s blog. I read blogs because I want to hear the opinions of others. Opinions, not 100 % scientific evaluations.

        Would I buy the U1253A? No, because it doesn’t satisfy my needs (not to say, it looks like rubbish to me). But if it would largely satisfy Dave’s needs, why not a thumbs-up?

      • Dakota

        Wow, that has got to be the worst battery life I have ever seen in a multimeter. I have a 25-30USD Radio-Shack multimeter, and it works for my purposes, but I haven’t changed the battery in 6 months. Six months and that’s on a cheap multimeter. I realize it doesn’t have the features of any of the high end multimeters you have reviewed, but battery life is very important to me.
        I can’t justify spending over $200 on any type of test equipment unless it is an oscilloscope. I guess depending on how much you make this may or may not be much money.
        On the construction of the multimeter, I have just a couple comments. I have to agree that mounting the banana plugs directly to the PCB was a very bad move. If anybody gets to rough with them they could end up cracking the PCB. Also, I didn’t like the fuse location either. Having to take apart an expensive piece of equipment just to change a fuse is a bit of a hassle.
        Considering that OLEDs are so bright, I was surprised to find the screen didn’t show up outside. I was quite expecting it to outshine the Fluke’s screen. Bit of a bummer there.

        I have watched your multimeter reviews and I can’t help but wonder; Have you ever designed a multimeter? Considering that you are in fact an electrical engineer, and that you have years of experience, I would think you would have or are planning to. I wouldn’t hesitate to buy a multimeter you designed (well, after reading a review of course) simply because they seem to be a big deal to you. I think you should give it a go, it would be interesting to see what you come up with.

      • walter delbono

        i’m not gonna write home to my mother about it…


        you are the best dave…


      • John McVirgo

        1. 8 hours batter life

        My god… who was the idiot that designed this piece of useless crap?

        Oh, let me guess, a graduate just out of college who designed something for himself to makes his job more interesting and to put experience on his CV rather than what’s of utmost importance when designing a portable multi-meter.

        Otherwise, a great meter, even though no one can use it in practical day to day situations

      • for years we have been using ac motors for industrial use and yes they last longer ,,

      • Lefthandofmaker

        Just came across this review of the U1253A OLED HH DMM. May I request access to view the response from Stormbyte? Currently I the video is said to be unavailable.

        Thanks for the help.

        • He must have removed the video. I do not have access to it.

      • ansack

        Hi Dave….

        any possibilty to do a review of the other 12XX multimeters made by Agilent.
        The U1251 model for example seems to be similiar and has standard screen. sure it has better battery life.
        In the other hand, the U1251 comes with more test probes and alkaline battery.
        By the way………it is worth the money the square wave generator of the 2 most expensive models compared to the U1251?

      • Just a small detail:
        The fast Capacitance measurement drops to an amazing 0.01 times/s for (really big) capacitors according to the datasheet (5989-5509EN.pdf)

      • After my Samsung 244T computer monitor broke, I ordered it because I assumed I can detect bad caps with it, just to learn shortly afterwards that I need an ESR meter for this (would the BK-879B work, too?). I wanted to cancel the order, but it already was on its way to the Packstation. It would have been returned when I wouldn’t pick it up in 7 days, but today I couldn’t resist anymore X-)
        Nice device! Albeit continuity a bit slow. And battery already not fully charged anymore after some minor playing around with it X-)

      • engineer40

        As a B-2 engineer, the meter is perfect- or nearly so. The oled display is a god send as I have to set the meter in funny positions/angles and an lcd display sucks unless you can see it straight on plus the poor lighting in the electronics bay makes it even more obscure. The battery life is a non-issue at work as the supply us with boxes of batts and plenty of charge stations. I do wish the latter iterations of this meter they would use a fluke type socket arrangement though. the only thing I would like better is a full colour display. woo woo

      The EEVblog Store generally ships twice a week, on Tuesdays & Fridays, Sydney time. Dismiss