EEVblog #846 – Solar Panel Micrometeorite Impact!

Dave uses a microscope to examine the shattered LG Mono-X solar panel. Was it a micrometeorite impact?
And what are the odds of a micrometeorite impact on a typical solar power installation in a given year?

Forum HERE

About EEVblog

Check Also

EEVblog #1334 – Mystery Dumpster Teardown

Mystery dumpster teardown time! With the most amazing mechanical mains power switch you’ll ever see! ...


  1. Interesting!! It reminded me of how important is the ‘sharpness’ of small objects as they hit glass surfaces ..
    I found this demo of a fellow who created small shards of the ceramic insulator from an ordinary engine sparkplug, shattering
    the ceramic with a hammer .. He then, without much force/velocity threw an approximately 1″ shard at a car window
    with am impressive result! :

    Then see:

    and finally (importantly!.. with a practical application! ) :

    a different effort by another individual using a ball-bearing or even an entire sparkplug was repulsed by the glass !

    Of course these ‘tests’ or ‘demo’s were not conducted with any semblance of ‘statistical validity’ but at the same time
    they might suggest that the very material of the object hitting tempered glass is related to damage caused.

    Thanks , Dave , for a great investigation and presentation too!! as always!

  2. I think a meteorite is far more likely than a micro-meteorite. The atmospheric drag on a micro-meteorite is going to be huge, so I don’t think there’s any way that it could have enough energy to do any real damage without vaporizing long before it hit the surface.

    For reference, this Wikipedia image from Wikipedia shows shingle damage from a 61.9g meteorite.

    • Yes, meteorite instead of micrometeorite (which wouldn’t have the impact velocity required). Someone has shown it to some meteorite experts and they agree it’s likely golfball size or maybe greater, hitting on a sharpish point.

  3. The size of the impact looks similar to the actual micro-meteorite impacts on the Hubble telescope solar arrays (see attached picture). Of course the Hubble solar arrays don’t have tempered glass for the nice pattern 😉

    Edit: the picture did not attach, I hope that the link works:

  4. Fireballs in the Sky

    Great question Dave! and thanks to Per Öresjö – @ikeraliR for the ping.

    Our meteorite experts answer your question:

  5. There is only way way to know 🙂 Hit another cricket ball into this thing!

  6. in order to find out what the embedded particles are I suggest check local universities and interest a researcher with access to a SEM with XRD …

  7. Come on, Dave, it is clearly one of your Batteriser buddies who has climbed up onto your roof and whacked your panel with a pick axe. It is no co-incidence it was the panel on the end. I mean, it’s obvious, isn’t it?

  8. Sure it wasn’t some visiting U.S. Policemen? They tend to shoot their weapons off a lot.

  9. Could it be a broken branch or stick? I’ve seen a branch go straight through a roof tile, broke it in half, and through the ceiling. Those brown particles look like it could be bits of branch.

  10. You got the rest of the panel, why not test it by trowing different things

    into it, like a smal stone, a ice bit, a golf ball… and compare it..

  11. Hello Dave thank you
    very much for the very nice investigation and analysis. Although I followed
    your evidences but arrived to a different collision. As you put some time to investigate
    this problem, I thought that it is not bad idea share my analysis with you. Let
    me explain. The speed of a micrometeorite
    should be at least equal to bullet fired from a gun to cause such an impact
    into your solar panel (60-100m/s for a 30-calibre or ~7.8mm diameter bullet ). Normally a micro size particle falling under
    the gravitational field of the Earth, like rain droplet, will reached to a terminal
    velocity soon due to air resistance forces. This is about a speed of few meter
    per second (see e,g,
    ) which definitely incapable to do any harm to the panel. The terminal velocity
    of skydiver of mass 75kg is 60m/s (
    ). This rules out a micrometeorite high speed impact. The second and very
    unlikely possibility would be a big meteorite that was falling with much bigger
    mass and therefore a much bigger speed which was burning during the fall so losing
    mass to a micrometeorite as falling and hit the panel surface. In that case at
    least part of the total kinetic energy should be transferred to heat as particle
    comes to rest in the panel and leaves a trace as residuals. This is also not
    seen in your panel. By ruling out of a micrometeorite collision, the only possibility
    left is with a no residuals and heat effect could be the effect of a sharp object
    like a nail that hammered into the panel! thanks Essnam

  12. Very informative and trustworthy blog that was really helpful. I will bookmark your site for future use. 토토사이트 dddd

  13. This is my first time pay a quick visit at here and i am truly happy to read all at alone place. 안전놀이터

  14. I¡¦ve been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or weblog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this site. Studying this information So i¡¦m happy to exhibit that I’ve a very excellent uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I most indisputably will make certain to don¡¦t put out of your mind this web site and give it a glance regularly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *