Author Topic: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.  (Read 10900 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EEVblogTopic starter

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 37742
  • Country: au
    • EEVblog
EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« on: August 26, 2022, 10:31:54 pm »
RIP this Fluke 3000 wireless multimeter. Thanks Energizer for the battery leakage!



Energizer battery leakage in liquid form:
 
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

Offline Muttley Snickers

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2341
  • Country: au
  • Cursed: 679 times
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2022, 11:24:14 pm »
I found the video quite disturbing and couldn't watch all of it, in fact it was like watching a horror movie.   :o

You could do us all a big favour by lodging a formal complaint to the battery manufacturer for compensation, make the whole thing public so they will have no option but to take notice and address these concerns once and for all.   ::)

 :popcorn:

 
 

Online ataradov

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11262
  • Country: us
    • Personal site
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2022, 11:26:37 pm »
I went to check my meters and the only one that just started leaking was Fluke. Also energizer batteries. No real damage, cleaned up and repaced with rechargeable batteries as I started doing that for all replacements.

This is the first time in my life I've got any battery leaking in the equipment. I've only seen them leak in storage for a VERY long time (5+ years over expiry date).
Alex
 

Offline blacksheeplogic

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 532
  • Country: nz
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2022, 11:30:37 pm »
Pretty sure I've been though all my old meters and removed the batteries but I think I will also recheck after seeing that.

Anything that does not fully power-off is susceptible to this problem. I spent a bit of time recently removing batteries from 40 calculators for the same reason- Energizers in one of the Casio Prizm's leaking.

 

Offline MikeK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1314
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2022, 01:35:16 am »
I checked mine and had to laugh.  The Energizer battery had leaked.  The two Radio Shack batteries were perfect.  All were at least 20 years old.
 

Online coppercone2

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9456
  • Country: us
  • $
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2022, 03:52:31 am »
Hey thats probobly why my fluke scope meter plastic chassis disintegrated. I think when I first got it I must have cleaned leaked battery goo. It weakened the plastic and caused failure. I never could explain why that meter developed like 5-6 giant cracks on it. I guess that stuff eats plastic. (the boards were saved so I can make a medium sized battery scope from a small junction box or something one day, throw some D cells instead of C cells in that)


I thought it might be unsafe for its CAT rating once the plastic chassis is effected by that crap. With heavy damage can you still trust the 'blast protection'? And also it looks like Energizer has captured themselves a queen...
« Last Edit: August 27, 2022, 04:01:52 am by coppercone2 »
 

Offline golden_labels

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1209
  • Country: pl
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #6 on: August 27, 2022, 10:45:46 am »
And suddenly we have a pandemic of Energizer batteries leaking in DMMs! What have you done?! :scared: ;)

I wonder why I never seen a report of a 4.5V or a 9V alkaline battery leaking. Is that a statistical bias due to them being used less often? Can they contain leaks better, being composed of multiple separate cells and often having free space inside? I just hope that question will not cause a sudden worldwide failure of 4.5/9V batteries.

Liar. I do! >:D
People imagine AI as T1000. What we got so far is glorified T9.
 

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2022, 11:47:46 am »
Hey thats probobly why my fluke scope meter plastic chassis disintegrated. I think when I first got it I must have cleaned leaked battery goo. It weakened the plastic and caused failure. I never could explain why that meter developed like 5-6 giant cracks on it. I guess that stuff eats plastic. (the boards were saved so I can make a medium sized battery scope from a small junction box or something one day, throw some D cells instead of C cells in that)


I thought it might be unsafe for its CAT rating once the plastic chassis is effected by that crap. With heavy damage can you still trust the 'blast protection'? And also it looks like Energizer has captured themselves a queen...

Having watched plenty of sci-fi horror filums, the culmination of nefarious AI, drones and now acid leaky power sources...

 :scared:
iratus parum formica
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 16865
  • Country: lv
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #8 on: August 27, 2022, 11:56:06 am »
That's why I only use rechargeables after a second time batteries leaked in my Agilent U1272A. First time battery contacts have completely disintegrated and I needed to replace a whole back cover. Second time I noticed it faster thus there was not so much damage.
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 16865
  • Country: lv
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #9 on: August 27, 2022, 12:00:09 pm »
And suddenly we have a pandemic of Energizer batteries leaking in DMMs! What have you done?! :scared: ;)

I wonder why I never seen a report of a 4.5V or a 9V alkaline battery leaking. Is that a statistical bias due to them being used less often? Can they contain leaks better, being composed of multiple separate cells and often having free space inside? I just hope that question will not cause a sudden worldwide failure of 4.5/9V batteries.

Liar. I do! >:D
They do leak, although usually not that much as it's a stack of batteries enclosed in outer shell which prevents most of the liquid from leaking out. Still battery contacts often corrode.
 

Offline Kjelt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6460
  • Country: nl
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #10 on: August 27, 2022, 12:14:13 pm »
I have started to take ALL batteries out from a device that I do not have to use more than once in a while.
Multimeter does not fall under that category and indeed my Fluke has Eneloop rechargeables in them for a while now.

Furthermore I replace all batteries of all remote controls (except the ones with Lithium coincells) on the 1st of January.
Had quite some discussion with the wife about "waisting money" , I think this vblog episode will convince her once and for all.

Very sad for you Dave, still thanks for the video.
 

Offline Ed.Kloonk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4000
  • Country: au
  • Cat video aficionado
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #11 on: August 27, 2022, 12:43:26 pm »

Furthermore I replace all batteries of all remote controls (except the ones with Lithium coincells) on the 1st of January.
I have a habit of buying a army of the one thing when I find some device I can tolerate. Most of these gadgets come with batteries and often with a current interrupt to be removed when first activated. I have to still go into the packaging and excise all the batteries before putting the items in storage. Don't ask me how I know.

Quote
Very sad for you Dave, still thanks for the video.
Indeed. This type of content conjurors up so many tales of woe.
iratus parum formica
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 16865
  • Country: lv
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #12 on: August 27, 2022, 12:45:17 pm »
I have started to take ALL batteries out from a device that I do not have to use more than once in a while.
Multimeter does not fall under that category and indeed my Fluke has Eneloop rechargeables in them for a while now.

Furthermore I replace all batteries of all remote controls (except the ones with Lithium coincells) on the 1st of January.
Had quite some discussion with the wife about "waisting money" , I think this vblog episode will convince her once and for all.

Very sad for you Dave, still thanks for the video.
You could just get cheap eneloops like IKEA LADDA (Japanese made) for EUR 5 for a pack of 4 or Amazon basics (Chinese made). The same thing as Panasonic. They will pay for themselves in a few years maximum if you throw out batteries annually. Not to say it's much safer, Alkalines sometimes leak fresh in the package.
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w, Kjelt

Offline MikeK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1314
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #13 on: August 27, 2022, 03:35:50 pm »
I wonder why I never seen a report of a 4.5V or a 9V alkaline battery leaking. Is that a statistical bias due to them being used less often?

My Energizer alkaline 9V in my old analog multimeter was the one that was leaking.  Leaked out the top and through the side seam.
 

Offline golden_labels

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1209
  • Country: pl
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2022, 04:54:35 pm »
Furthermore I replace all batteries of all remote controls (except the ones with Lithium coincells) on the 1st of January.
I would replace those with Eneloops too. If you care about remotes, which are cheap, consider how much money you waste on primary batteries. Not to mention environmental cost.
People imagine AI as T1000. What we got so far is glorified T9.
 

Offline Messtechniker

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 782
  • Country: de
  • Old analog audio hand - No voodoo.
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #15 on: August 27, 2022, 07:01:21 pm »
This Vid frightened the life out of me :scared:.

Immediately removed all batteries from all equipment not constantly in use.
Wanted to do this all along, but this really got me up and going.

Next will do pics for the lab door of all equipment still containg batteries.
So that my nephew can remove these batteries - especially those in my R&S UPGR -
as soon as he returns from my funeral, which hopefully is still a long way off.


Agilent 34465A, Siglent SDG 2042X, Hameg HMO1022, R&S HMC 8043, Peaktech 2025A, Voltcraft VC 940, M-Audio Audiophile 192, R&S Psophometer UPGR, 3 Transistor Testers, DL4JAL Transistor Curve Tracer, UT622E LCR meter
 

Online ataradov

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11262
  • Country: us
    • Personal site
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #16 on: August 27, 2022, 07:16:27 pm »
I went and checked other random low value stuff I have. And here is an example of a leaking 9V battery.
Alex
 
The following users thanked this post: golden_labels

Online coppercone2

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9456
  • Country: us
  • $
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #17 on: August 27, 2022, 07:42:44 pm »
This Vid frightened the life out of me :scared:.

Immediately removed all batteries from all equipment not constantly in use.
Wanted to do this all along, but this really got me up and going.

Next will do pics for the lab door of all equipment still containg batteries.
So that my nephew can remove these batteries - especially those in my R&S UPGR -
as soon as he returns from my funeral, which hopefully is still a long way off.

calm down man, its usually minor. If you are paranoid check the voltage, if its greater then like 0.9V then you are probobly OK. Usually its badly discharged ones that leak for people who try to squeeze the last nanowatt out of them. hydrogen pressure increases as discharge increases and probability of leak increases (with exceptions but any part can really get destroyed by random chance). You can do the usual derating as we do with any part to increase reliability and decrease risk, but with voltages and also warentee age.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2022, 07:47:09 pm by coppercone2 »
 

Offline spostma

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 118
  • Country: nl
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #18 on: August 27, 2022, 07:46:16 pm »
Would replacing Alkaline cells by good NiMH batteries (the ones specified for low self-discharge) help to avoid leakage?
 

Online coppercone2

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9456
  • Country: us
  • $
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #19 on: August 27, 2022, 07:48:12 pm »
I have seen NiMH cells leak but its a smaller amount then alkaline (but these were AAAs). I think they are just somewhat dryer inside. I have even seen eneloop that had some white crystal on the end.
 

Offline nikifena

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 125
  • Country: bg
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2022, 08:49:05 pm »
Hey Dave, give me that Fluke. I will try to fix it.
 

Offline djenson

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: gb
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2022, 09:08:12 pm »
Posting here for the highest chance that you will see it.


Quote
Energizer® No Leaks. Guaranteed.

Energizer will repair or replace, at our option, any device damaged by leakage from Energizer MAX® Alkaline batteries either during the life of the battery or within two years following the full use of the battery.

https://www.energizer.com/about-batteries/battery-leakage

Would be interesting to see what they do
 

Offline MikeK

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1314
  • Country: us
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #22 on: August 27, 2022, 10:28:52 pm »
I question the usefulness of the Energizer guarantee, other than as a marketing scheme.  As usual, the devil is in the details.  That guarantee is not forever, of course.  What qualifies as the life of the battery?  No doubt it is once it reaches some nominal low voltage, possibly 6V?...Maybe 7V?  All of the people discovering the leaked batteries are doing so because they completely forgot about them.  Battery voltage at that point is probably well below the "end of life" voltage.
 

Offline Black Phoenix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1129
  • Country: hk
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2022, 04:21:11 am »
Not only that, the warranty only applies to their Energizer Max line up, the ones that come with the a Fluke are their basic line-up.

But probably they would replace the Fluke because Dave is kinda know in the a Internet, and not replacing means bad PR. Although a user like me and you? You can go pound sand. In still waiting for the reply to my complain regarding when Duracell Procell AA blow up inside my 54-II back in 2011.

But I would also not be surprised if not even Dave got it replaced it or even a reply. Currently there are only 1 brand I have confidence on: Panasonic.

GP battery is in a somewhat close 2nd Place, Varts, Duracell and Energizer are all dead last. Lost enough stuff for that 3 brands to even not wanting to see them being sold.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2022, 07:55:25 am by Black Phoenix »
 

Offline Per Hansson

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 428
  • Country: se
Re: EEVblog 1497 - RIP Fluke. Thanks Energizer. NOT.
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2022, 07:49:26 am »
All of the people discovering the leaked batteries are doing so because they completely forgot about them.  Battery voltage at that point is probably well below the "end of life" voltage.
All of the people? Utter bullshit!
I have had alkaline batteries leak when they are still new in the original packaging and within their expiry date code!
I even think Dave might have had a video on that a few years ago.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf