EEVblog 1548 - Moon Landing Hoax BUSTED

[EEVblog]

The Moon Landing Hoax conspiricy theory BUSTED with Dave's original proof.

Dave does something no one else has done before - compare the original Apollo 17 16mm ascent camera footage to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) photos.
Will footage from 40 years apart match up to confirm the moon landing?

The Last Man On The Moon: http://amzn.to/2h1b6Xc
Audio Book: http://amzn.to/2uySy3X
Book: http://amzn.to/2uV67NB

LunarCognita Video:
Inside & Outside footage:
Lunar Roving Vehicle Handbook: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16OTM15-42.pdf

[Ed.Kloonk]

Nice vid. Of course, the 2011 satellite data could have been manipulated. 

Gene's book title is a play on words calling back to HG Wells' The First Men in the Moon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Men_in_the_Moon

[MK14]

LunarCognita Video:

I'm getting the following error message:

Code: [Select]

Video unavailable
This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been closed.
If I investigate further, by going to what seems to be that Youtube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9AFEC8928F9240D6

I then get the following message:

5 unavailable videos are hidden

So maybe the CIA have deleted/disabled the video(s), once they found out about this hoax thread/video?

***Edited by secret CIA-moderator-Administrator-team, authorisation:Moon-Landing-Cover-Up-3676346471***[Using SMF hack vector 53665467382]

[MK14]

Question:

As regards this new EEVblog video.
A number of years ago, I watched a similar video, on another EEVblog Youtube channel, I think it was this one:



How do these two videos, correlate?

E.g. Do they complement each other?

I haven't watched the videos in this thread, yet.  I'd prefer to know, before watching, so I can better understand the situation. (As I find it confusing to have two rather similar videos).

[MTA]

https://apolloinrealtime.org/17/

[vk6zgo]

The Moon Landing Hoax conspiricy theory BUSTED with Dave's original proof.

Dave does something no one else has done before - compare the original Apollo 17 16mm ascent camera footage to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) photos.
Will footage from 40 years apart match up to confirm the moon landing?

The Last Man On The Moon: http://amzn.to/2h1b6Xc
Audio Book: http://amzn.to/2uySy3X
Book: http://amzn.to/2uV67NB

LunarCognita Video:
Inside & Outside footage:
Lunar Roving Vehicle Handbook: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16OTM15-42.pdf

You were right about the crazies coming out in force in the comments section!

[Per Hansson]

Question:

As regards this new EEVblog video.
A number of years ago, I watched a similar video, on another EEVblog Youtube channel, I think it was this one:

How do these two videos, correlate?

E.g. Do they complement each other?

I haven't watched the videos in this thread, yet.  I'd prefer to know, before watching, so I can better understand the situation. (As I find it confusing to have two rather similar videos).

Dave stated this in one of the comments on YT:
"I'm slowing releasing my old EEVdiscover videos on the main channel so they can reach a new audience."

[MK14]

Dave stated this in one of the comments on YT:
"I'm slowing releasing my old EEVdiscover videos on the main channel so they can reach a new audience."

Thanks for the reply!
Pity it didn't mention it in the videos description, or as a bare minimum, pin such comment(s) at the top.  I bet since I've noticed, there could be thousands of other users in the same boat.

[SiliconWizard]

Now the interesting question is who's gonna set foot on the moon again first?
Bets are open.

[EEVblog]

Now the interesting question is who's gonna set foot on the moon again first?

Don't know, but if it's the Americans they openly admit the choice is driven by identity politics 

[EEVblog]

I haven't watched the videos in this thread, yet.  I'd prefer to know, before watching, so I can better understand the situation. (As I find it confusing to have two rather similar videos).

As others said, I'm re-uploading some EEVdiscover material onto the main channel to reach a new audience. Minor tweaks to the edit.

[EEVblog]

Pity it didn't mention it in the videos description, or as a bare minimum, pin such comment(s) at the top.  I bet since I've noticed, there could be thousands of other users in the same boat.

FYI, you might be surprised to learn that almost no one reads the description or the pinned comment.

[nctnico]

But wait a minute here... The Lunar reconnaissance orbiter is also launched and operated by NASA so how we can be sure the footage isn't doctored to match with the original film? 

We'd need footage from Russian or Chinese space craft to confirm 

[tszaboo]

Now the interesting question is who's gonna set foot on the moon again first?

Don't know, but if it's the Americans they openly admit the choice is driven by identity politics 

"It's good to be black on the moon"
https://twitter.com/realspaceforce/status/1275899470362927104?lang=en

[Ed.Kloonk]

Now the interesting question is who's gonna set foot on the moon again first?

Don't know, but if it's the Americans they openly admit the choice is driven by identity politics 

"It's good to be black on the moon"
https://twitter.com/realspaceforce/status/1275899470362927104?lang=en

There goes the neighbourhood. *


* Was a joke. Stop typing.

[magic]

Don't know, but if it's the Americans they openly admit the choice is driven by identity politics 

Still mad and trying to one-up the Ruskies who sent the first woman and the first dog into space.

I recommend throwing a hamster into the mix for even more diversity, don't think that has been done yet.

edit
No one in his right mind doubts the Moon landings; there is even video evidence on YouTube showing that a crew from Democratic Germany was there first

[Ed.Kloonk]

Don't know, but if it's the Americans they openly admit the choice is driven by identity politics 

Still mad and trying to one-up the Ruskies who sent the first woman and the first dog into space.

I recommend throwing a hamster into the mix for even more diversity, don't think that has been done yet.

Such is the clown show, I would have thought Ronald McDonald would be the obvious choice.

[AndyBeez]

Japanese verification of a moon landing, from 15 years ago.

https://www.universetoday.com/15579/japanese-selene-kaguya-lunar-mission-spots-apollo-15-landing-site-images/

[SiliconWizard]

Now the interesting question is who's gonna set foot on the moon again first?

Don't know, but if it's the Americans they openly admit the choice is driven by identity politics 

Who would have thought. That's a bit retrograde though, in a world where politics are now unable to define what a woman is.

[TimFox]

I'm old enough that I knew technical persons (engineers and scientists) who were involved in the moon landings (although I didn't know any astronauts personally).
They were generally honest people of high standards, and there were enough of them to make it difficult to publicly fake such things.

[Bud]

Kudos to EEVBlog for crafting the Title which lured both camps to click 

[magic]

I'm old enough that I knew technical persons (engineers and scientists) who were involved in the moon landings (although I didn't know any astronauts personally).
They were generally honest people of high standards, and there were enough of them to make it difficult to publicly fake such things.

They didn't know that CIA built a replica of the spacecraft where all the footage was filmed and they were busy sending an empty can to the Moon

[TimFox]

I'm old enough that I knew technical persons (engineers and scientists) who were involved in the moon landings (although I didn't know any astronauts personally).
They were generally honest people of high standards, and there were enough of them to make it difficult to publicly fake such things.

They didn't know that CIA built a replica of the spacecraft where all the footage was filmed and they were busy sending an empty can to the Moon

That's right--they knew better than that.

[nctnico]

I'm old enough that I knew technical persons (engineers and scientists) who were involved in the moon landings (although I didn't know any astronauts personally).
They were generally honest people of high standards, and there were enough of them to make it difficult to publicly fake such things.

That is not a very strong argument because it boils down to hearsay. None of the people you reference to have been on the moon themselves. A much stronger argument is in the rocks that where taken back from the moon as some of these have rather unique features which are not present in rocks found on earth. You can doctor images / film and make people come up with collaborated stories but faking physical items that have been subjected to an entirely different environment for millions of years and make these pass scientific examination for decades is hard (understatement).

[AndyBeez]

Technical question time.... if you film yourself kicking dust on earth at 60fps, by how many frames per second would you need to slow the footage on playback to make it look as if you were kicking dust on the moon? Or if the CIA filmed it before hand, how many frames would a camera need to be over-cranked (running faster), to make playback at 30fps look lunar?

Hint: Earth G versus Lunar G