The same over here but what does testing lots of people actually accomplish right now? Nothing because in the end you can't catch all cases if you are not going to test everyone in a country. The point where mass-testing serves a purpose (containment) is far behind us.
Nope. In Finland, Helsinki region is worst hit; basically everywhere else is fine.
The problem in Helsinki is that due to a number of reasons, the social pressure is weakest here, and people are not following the social isolation recommendations.
If we did test, we would have the numbers to show the stupid ones that they too have to isolate. Over half of the Finnish cases are in the Greater Helsinki region (Helsinki-Vantaa-Espoo), with about 1.2 million people.
Instead, our "official" figures are something like 400, whereas looking at the
curve, you can trivially extrapolate the correct number to be around 800 -- on the order of Canada; Finland and Canada tracked very closely till Mar 14, when testing was essentially stopped in Helsinki region in Finland.
The numbers would help officials and people realize the importance of social distancing. Alternatively, the officials could just fake the numbers to achieve the same. As it stands, everyone is going based on their "gut feeling" instead, and too many here feel that it Is Somebody Elses Problem for now.
Do remember, that from infection, a person will start spreading the virus within 6 hours to a day and a half, whereas it takes about five days on average for the symptoms. So, a lot of people who
believe, erroneously, that they are healthy, are spreading the virus. It is those that we need to stop and isolate. The ones who are already ill, well, people naturally tend to avoid those; it's the healthy-looking virus spreaders that are doing the damage right now.
Testing, even random testing to find out the actual number of infected, would help make that visible, and help enforce harder isolation rules and penalties, as the true extent of the problem would be undeniable.