How to build an ideal transformer!

[Andy Chee]

I merely have simulated it. Here it is.

If you haven't been told already, simulations do not always mirror reality.

You need to build a real world device in order to prove the simulation is correct, not the other way around.

I don't have to build anything which others have already built.

Yes, otherwise how do you know others aren't scamming you with a fake device?  Are you trusting them on faith?

Faith is for religions, not engineering.

Simulations are not enough.

[Xena E]

I don't have to build anything which others have already built.

Some fucking clueless twat on you tube charges capacitors with CFL driver circuit, and makes sparks ... proves what exactly?

[paul cotter]

Good grief!, Xena, I just wasted 12minutes of my life, I will be blaming you for this loss!
Back to your question, ie what does this prove? - it proves that the maker of this video is a clown.

[paul cotter]

Andy, these people that Chet sees as authority figures are all just scammers trying to make some money from the gullible masses. Nothing new about this though it has been getting worse in the internet age.

[Chet]

I merely have simulated it. Here it is.

If you haven't been told already, simulations do not always mirror reality.

You need to build a real world device in order to prove the simulation is correct, not the other way around.

I don't have to build anything which others have already built.

Yes, otherwise how do you know others aren't scamming you with a fake device?  Are you trusting them on faith?

I trust Byron on faith. Whether this YouTube video is fake is an optional consideration since it doesn't alter my trust in Byron in the least.

In other words, your criticism is notwithstanding.

You have a different, yet commonplace, method of approaching a verdict. I don't work that way (obviously). I start with the person since I am an empath which is similar to a telepath except the distinction is emotional rapport rather than mental telepathy. I assess the person's integrity: have they paid a price for their knowledge and what was that price? Nothing's for free. Not even "free energy" is for free. Yet, its price is not a cost of being scammed unless you've been sold a false bill of sale. Its price is human suffering without reward. For, in our world, combating ignorance is a thankless task.

But, then, you'd know about that! 

Faith is for religions, not engineering.

Simulations are not enough.

Not enough to convince you or anyone else. But sufficient for myself since the simulation is merely a vague overview of what to expect concerning a topic of which I already possess an inherited memory of contributed by somebody else from a bygone era. This memory is fuzzy at best since it dates back a ways in time. So, my accuracy will definitely be at fault from time to time and sometimes outright wrong.

That's a given, but is not a fatal flaw.


This is the only way to honestly assess so-called reincarnation. So-called, since no one reincarnates. The prior persons merely contribute to my soul memory which we share. But, I am my own person. They came and went and are no more. Only a dim memory of their legacy survives their collective deaths -- a legacy I am forced to live with (by my birth) whether I want their legacy or not.

None of this is provable. You either remember your inherited past or else you don't.

[paul cotter]

No one is suggesting that the video is fake, it is simply meaningless. Any half competent techie can charge caps with a cfl driver. I can charge a high voltage oil filled cap with enough voltage to throw you across a room by simply putting it near the end of a twenty stage multiplier driven by a tiny battery powered inductive fed Royer- would that impress you? Well it should not, as it is easily explained.

[Chet]

No one is suggesting that the video is fake, it is simply meaningless. Any half competent techie can charge caps with a cfl driver. I can charge a high voltage oil filled cap with enough voltage to throw you across a room by simply putting it near the end of a twenty stage multiplier driven by a tiny battery powered inductive fed Royer- would that impress you? Well it should not, as it is easily explained.

I wouldn't call "entertainment value" meaningless since that's what probably attracts attention the most is a system which utilizes merely the voltage aspect of the sine wave input of the house A/C mains, rather than much of its current, replenished by current from the Earth. This has a certain ambience about it. Your's is certainly the way an engineer would think since that's your training.

But attempting to apply Tesla's legacy in a practical manner might result in novel methods which may not appear to an engineer to be the most efficient. Yet, they do illustrate a point. That point was made clear to us in Junior High math class: that there are multiple methods of solving math problems. But since the quiz was to test our ability to think in terms of geometry (let's say), then we were required to show all of our work on how we got the answer since some of us were known for intuitively figuring out the answer without a clue what it meant (hint, hint).

To the homeowner, Byron's method of the acquisition of current from a source which does not require a meter is a very attractive idea.

So, the YouTuber who made that video got to feel a certain amount of smug satisfaction while you orchestrate NASA missions and whatnot.

To each his own.

[paul cotter]

Nonsense Chet. If you connect a very low power circuit to the mains and a cheap power meter registers no power it simply means the power draw is too low to show. If no power is being drawn from the grid then it should make no difference to unplug the grid connection- it is then that you find out where the power is coming from.

[SteveThackery]

...... since the simulation is merely a vague overview of what to expect concerning a topic of which I already possess an inherited memory of contributed by somebody else from a bygone era. This memory is fuzzy at best since it dates back a ways in time.

Here we go: Chet is displaying one of the classic signs of people who think they know better than established science because they are "special". It is certainly "special" to claim you have inherited memories of people from a bygone era. Although it's odd how it is always memories of other practitioners of unscience, and not those of a bus driver or janitor.

Your's is certainly the way an engineer would think since that's your training.

And classic sign number two: claiming that educated or trained people are unable to think outside the narrow constraints of their brainwashing, whereas Chet (amongst others) is not constrained in that way because he has no such education - thus he can obtain insights not available to educated brainwashed people.

Chet: have you any idea just how predictable, how mundane, your ramblings are?

[SteveThackery]

........ what probably attracts attention the most is a system which utilizes merely the voltage aspect of the sine wave input of the house A/C mains, rather than much of its current, replenished by current from the Earth.

Chet, let me ask a very basic question. You are describing something which utilises the voltage from the AC mains, but does not draw current from it (therefore consumes no power from the mains). Instead, the current is drawn from the earth, so useful work can be done without consuming mains power.

The question: if current is drawn from the earth, where does it go after it has transferred energy into the load? Back into the earth? And can you explain again where the energy comes from?

[paul cotter]

"Practitioners of unscience" 
Very good, Steve, I like it, why did I not think of that?
PS: that reminds me of the "Uncyclopedia, the content free encyclopedia", they do a good analysis of the late T E Bearden.

[Xena E]

Good grief!, Xena, I just wasted 12minutes of my life, I will be blaming you for this loss!
Back to your question, ie what does this prove? - it proves that the maker of this video is a clown.

Hey! Didn't you believe my synopsis? So you had to watch it yourself?

The warm weather must be getting to you Paul!

Back to topic...

........ what probably attracts attention the most is a system which utilizes merely the voltage aspect of the sine wave input of the house A/C mains, rather than much of its current, replenished by current from the Earth.

Chet, let me ask a very basic question. You are describing something which utilises the voltage from the AC mains, but does not draw current from it (therefore consumes no power from the mains). Instead, the current is drawn from the earth, so useful work can be done without consuming mains power.

The question: if current is drawn from the earth, where does it go after it has transferred energy into the load? Back into the earth? And can you explain again where the energy comes from?

My electricity comes up out of the ground! Yup, it sure does!

I normally get around 3 or 4kWh/day but I'm pretty damn sure that I could get up to 360kWh/day if I needed too, perhaps I should make a YouTube video about how it's done, whatcha all think?

 

[Chet]

Nonsense Chet. If you connect a very low power circuit to the mains and a cheap power meter registers no power it simply means the power draw is too low to show. If no power is being drawn from the grid then it should make no difference to unplug the grid connection- it is then that you find out where the power is coming from.

If you connect a very low power circuit

What constitutes a low power circuit?

If you connect a very low input powered circuit to the mains, then its reactance will be liberated from suppression -- if designed to take advantage of most of its power oscillated as reactance. This non-spendable reactance can then be used to orchestrate the suction of current from out of the ground without the short-cut of having a voltage source pushing this current from out of the ground.

That's, in essence, how I understand Byron's deviation of Tesla's Hairpin circuit is intended to operate.

Not bad, heh? 

[paul cotter]

Xena, I only looked at the video because you had done so. I would not doubt your judgement but the fact that you did look at it aroused my curiosity.

[Chet]

sign #1: science established in commerce

sign number two: no restraint from a reputation which only pays dividends when it conforms to established science (see sign #1).

[paul cotter]

"If you connect a very low input powered circuit to the mains, then its reactance will be liberated from suppression -- if designed to take advantage of most of its power oscillated as reactance. This non-spendable reactance can then be used to orchestrate the suction of current from out of the ground without the short-cut of having a voltage source pushing this current from out of the ground."

We are back to torturing the concept of reactance, again!

[Chet]

........ what probably attracts attention the most is a system which utilizes merely the voltage aspect of the sine wave input of the house A/C mains, rather than much of its current, replenished by current from the Earth.

Chet, let me ask a very basic question. You are describing something which utilises the voltage from the AC mains, but does not draw ...

... much ...

current from it (therefore consumes ...

... almost ...

no power from the mains). Instead, the current is ...

... mostly ...

... drawn from the earth, so useful work can be done without consuming ...

... too much ...

... mains power.

The question: if current is drawn from the earth, where does it go after it has transferred energy into the load?

It's dissipated from the load as: heat, friction, and radiation (EM and ES fields).

Back into the earth?

Back into the earth? ... as oscillations to complete the loop.

And can you explain again where the energy comes from?

Reactance comes from the oscillations of caps and coils. Energy comes from combining the forces which we measure as voltage and current over a period of sustained time (as compared to instantaneous power). To assume that both ingredients of power must come from the same source is assuming that all of the wood for your home must come from the same forest.

[Chet]

Good grief!, Xena, I just wasted 12minutes of my life, I will be blaming you for this loss!
Back to your question, ie what does this prove? - it proves that the maker of this video is a clown.

Hey! Didn't you believe my synopsis? So you had to watch it yourself?

The warm weather must be getting to you Paul!

Back to topic...

........ what probably attracts attention the most is a system which utilizes merely the voltage aspect of the sine wave input of the house A/C mains, rather than much of its current, replenished by current from the Earth.

Chet, let me ask a very basic question. You are describing something which utilises the voltage from the AC mains, but does not draw current from it (therefore consumes no power from the mains). Instead, the current is drawn from the earth, so useful work can be done without consuming mains power.

The question: if current is drawn from the earth, where does it go after it has transferred energy into the load? Back into the earth? And can you explain again where the energy comes from?

My electricity comes up out of the ground! Yup, it sure does!

I normally get around 3 or 4kWh/day but I'm pretty damn sure that I could get up to 360kWh/day if I needed too, perhaps I should make a YouTube video about how it's done, whatcha all think?

 

Only if you have honest intentions. Otherwise, the popcorn won't help.

[Chet]

"If you connect a very low input powered circuit to the mains, then its reactance will be liberated from suppression -- if designed to take advantage of most of its power oscillated as reactance. This non-spendable reactance can then be used to orchestrate the suction of current from out of the ground without the short-cut of having a voltage source pushing this current from out of the ground."

We are back to torturing the concept of reactance, again!

I never knew that negative impedance was a form of torture.

[Xena E]

Good grief!, Xena, I just wasted 12minutes of my life, I will be blaming you for this loss!
Back to your question, ie what does this prove? - it proves that the maker of this video is a clown.

Hey! Didn't you believe my synopsis? So you had to watch it yourself?

The warm weather must be getting to you Paul!

Back to topic...

........ what probably attracts attention the most is a system which utilizes merely the voltage aspect of the sine wave input of the house A/C mains, rather than much of its current, replenished by current from the Earth.

Chet, let me ask a very basic question. You are describing something which utilises the voltage from the AC mains, but does not draw current from it (therefore consumes no power from the mains). Instead, the current is drawn from the earth, so useful work can be done without consuming mains power.

The question: if current is drawn from the earth, where does it go after it has transferred energy into the load? Back into the earth? And can you explain again where the energy comes from?

My electricity comes up out of the ground! Yup, it sure does!

I normally get around 3 or 4kWh/day but I'm pretty damn sure that I could get up to 360kWh/day if I needed too, perhaps I should make a YouTube video about how it's done, whatcha all think?

 

Only if you have honest intentions. Otherwise, the popcorn won't help.

Perfectly honest.

The electricity I'm using right now is coming out of the ground.

Reactance comes from the oscillations of caps and coils. Energy comes from combining the forces which we measure as voltage and current over a period of sustained time (as compared to instantaneous power). To assume that both ingredients of power must come from the same source is assuming that all of the wood for your home must come from the same forest.

   

[Gyro]

Aren't you guys finding the weather too hot to indulge a 'Chet' ?

[paul cotter]

 

[Xena E]

Aren't you guys finding the weather too hot to indulge a 'Chet' ?

I've worked it out! Chet is an emotional masochist. He just can't be this stupid!

[paul cotter]

"If you connect a very low input powered circuit to the mains, then its reactance will be liberated from suppression -- if designed to take advantage of most of its power oscillated as reactance. This non-spendable reactance can then be used to orchestrate the suction of current from out of the ground without the short-cut of having a voltage source pushing this current from out of the ground."

That must stand as an absolute classic in the misuse of technical terms.

As regards the level of stupidity, willful ignorance is way worse than stupidity.

[Andy Chee]

If you connect a very low input powered circuit to the mains, then its reactance will be liberated from suppression -- if designed to take advantage of most of its power oscillated as reactance. This non-spendable reactance can then be used to orchestrate the suction of current from out of the ground without the short-cut of having a voltage source pushing this current from out of the ground.

That's, in essence, how I understand Byron's deviation of Tesla's Hairpin circuit is intended to operate.

Technobabble

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technobabble

See also

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibberish

On a tangent, AI often spits out nonsense structured into cogent sentences. But AI is often trained on new material from a wide range of sources, Chet appears to be stuck in a small loop/echo chamber of his own BS.