Author Topic: Stock Electronic Image FAILS  (Read 508426 times)

0 Members and 50 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online themadhippy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4574
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1300 on: September 11, 2025, 03:29:08 pm »
way my eyesites going im gonna need one of  them microscopes just read the bands on a 3 watt resistor,to think i used to able to just glance at  an 1/8 watt  and read the colour code without a magnifier in site
 

Offline Analog Kid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4990
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1301 on: September 11, 2025, 06:38:06 pm »
That's a method of measuring resistance I wasn't aware of..

But where is their mandated protective eyewear?
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8109
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1302 on: September 11, 2025, 11:28:45 pm »
The plain old push type rotary mowers (non self propelled) "don't need no steenkin' drive belt"!

The one depicted has a clutch control on the bars, so the belt drives the rear wheels. We've had several over many years and they've all had drive to the wheels.

Such devices exist in Oz, but are quite rare. The non-self propelled ones aren't that heavy to push & are cheaper.
 

Offline vk6zgo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8109
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1303 on: September 11, 2025, 11:31:50 pm »
way my eyesites going im gonna need one of  them microscopes just read the bands on a 3 watt resistor,to think i used to able to just glance at  an 1/8 watt  and read the colour code without a magnifier in site
The problem isn't your eyesight as much as the crappy palette of colours they use these days, which make yellow, brown & red almost the same.
 

Offline Analog Kid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4990
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1304 on: September 11, 2025, 11:35:40 pm »
way my eyesites going im gonna need one of  them microscopes just read the bands on a 3 watt resistor,to think i used to able to just glance at  an 1/8 watt  and read the colour code without a magnifier in site
The problem isn't your eyesight as much as the crappy palette of colours they use these days, which make yellow, brown & red almost the same.

My pet peeve there is how close red and orange are.
Is that 4.7K or 47K?
Need a damn spectrometer. (Or an ohmmeter.)
 

Offline gamalot

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1944
  • Country: au
  • Correct my English
    • Youtube
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1305 on: September 11, 2025, 11:41:55 pm »
What I want to know is what is that parameter, Ube?

Oh, I get it, the "AI" hallucination of "Vbe"? (I guess ~500 mV is about right?)

It has nothing to do with AI, it is a Chinese style (probably learned from some European countries)
I'm a poet, I didn't even know it. |  https://youtube.com/@gamalot | https://github.com/gamalot
 

Offline Analog Kid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4990
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1306 on: September 12, 2025, 01:02:46 am »
So what does "U" stand for, anyhow?
The rest of them I get (E, V, I).
 

Offline gamalot

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1944
  • Country: au
  • Correct my English
    • Youtube
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1307 on: September 12, 2025, 01:19:12 am »
The use of U to represent voltage may originate from either German or Latin, I’m not sure which exact word it comes from. One advantage of using U is that it avoids confusion with V, which often denotes velocity in physics textbooks.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2025, 02:24:14 am by gamalot »
I'm a poet, I didn't even know it. |  https://youtube.com/@gamalot | https://github.com/gamalot
 

Online themadhippy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4574
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1308 on: September 12, 2025, 01:32:42 am »
Quote
I’m not sure which exact word it comes from.
difference, as in potential difference
 

Offline Analog Kid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4990
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1309 on: September 12, 2025, 02:03:19 am »
Quote
I’m not sure which exact word it comes from.
difference, as in potential difference

But how do you get "U" out of that?
 

Online themadhippy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4574
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1310 on: September 12, 2025, 02:07:02 am »
Unterschied
 
The following users thanked this post: PlainName, gamalot, the Chris

Offline McBryce

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2798
  • Country: de
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1311 on: September 12, 2025, 10:16:52 am »
So what does "U" stand for, anyhow?
The rest of them I get (E, V, I).

In German (and possibly some other languages?), U is used to denote Voltage. It comes from the Latin word Urgere, which I think means "to push or displace".

McBryce.
30 Years making cars more difficult to repair.
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5679
  • Country: de
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1312 on: September 12, 2025, 11:27:03 am »
That is correct and we learn this in Germany:

In the German language, voltage was originally referred to as the "difference of electric potentials".
„Unterschied der elektrischen Potenziale“

Therefore, the abbreviation U became established here in Germany and still is today.


There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 
The following users thanked this post: AVGresponding, the Chris

Offline McBryce

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2798
  • Country: de
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1313 on: September 12, 2025, 02:14:30 pm »
That is correct and we learn this in Germany:

In the German language, voltage was originally referred to as the "difference of electric potentials".
„Unterschied der elektrischen Potenziale“

Therefore, the abbreviation U became established here in Germany and still is today.

Confused the hell out of me when I moved here originally. I studied in Ireland, where we use V, and ohms law with a U just looks wrong as far as I am concerned.

McBryce.
30 Years making cars more difficult to repair.
 

Offline exe

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3037
  • Country: nl
  • self-educated hobbyist
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1314 on: September 12, 2025, 02:22:11 pm »
Interesting, I'm not triggered by U instead of V, and I don't care much. I'm of eastern-european background, and it seems in Soviet Union "U" was used for voltage (I just checked "The art of electronics" 2nd edition in Russian). Also in Russian wikipedia: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD_%D0%9E%D0%BC%D0%B0 (Ohm's law). Probably, that's also what I learned at school.
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11976
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1315 on: September 12, 2025, 02:31:48 pm »
I learned Ohm’s Law as E = I R 65 years ago, where E stood for electro-motive force (emf).
Why is current labeled I?  Intensity?
In physics, when emf is distinguished from potential difference, it is defined as the line integral of the electric field (vector), which itself can be defined as the gradient (vector) of the potential (scalar).
 

Offline tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9835
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1316 on: September 12, 2025, 10:17:57 pm »
I learned Ohm’s Law as E = I R 65 years ago, where E stood for electro-motive force (emf).
Why is current labeled I?  Intensity?
In physics, when emf is distinguished from potential difference, it is defined as the line integral of the electric field (vector), which itself can be defined as the gradient (vector) of the potential (scalar).
Never mind that, when Electromagnetic fields was taught, we run out of the capital and lowercase greek alphabet as well, and sigma was used for like 4 different things.
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5679
  • Country: de
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1317 on: September 13, 2025, 10:39:09 am »
I learned Ohm’s Law as E = I R 65 years ago, where E stood for electro-motive force (emf).
Why is current labeled I?  Intensity?


Yes, the "I" for current goes back to the roots in France “intensité de courant” based on the influence of André Ampère.
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 18111
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1318 on: September 15, 2025, 03:53:08 pm »
The problem isn't your eyesight as much as the crappy palette of colours they use these days, which make yellow, brown & red almost the same.

Yep, cheapest possible paint, colors look all the same.

The blue ones are even worse.
 

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11976
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1319 on: September 15, 2025, 04:12:21 pm »
The use of U to represent voltage may originate from either German or Latin, I’m not sure which exact word it comes from. One advantage of using U is that it avoids confusion with V, which often denotes velocity in physics textbooks.

In American physics books, velocity is lower-case v, while potential is upper-case V.
A real physicist tries to get velocity (properly italicized) and Greek “nu” for frequency into every equation to confuse the reader.
Careful usage (my mantra) italicizes variables but not units:  V = 12 V.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2025, 05:10:48 pm by TimFox »
 

Online themadhippy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4574
  • Country: gb
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1320 on: September 15, 2025, 05:01:39 pm »
Quote
The blue ones are even worse
yep,with green being a close second,back when i wura lad resistors were beige and the colours stood out.
 

Offline Circlotron

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3567
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1321 on: September 15, 2025, 11:26:54 pm »
V vs U for voltage is *potentially* confusing.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2025, 03:31:01 am by Circlotron »
 

Offline Analog Kid

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4990
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1322 on: September 15, 2025, 11:28:02 pm »
V vs U for voltage is potentially confusing.

But only for someone from Yurp or Asia. Nobody over here (US) uses "U".
 

Online PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8852
  • Country: 00
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1323 on: September 16, 2025, 09:28:34 am »
V vs U for voltage is *potentially* confusing.

That's shocking.
 

Offline kite31

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Country: au
Re: Stock Electronic Image FAILS
« Reply #1324 on: September 16, 2025, 09:58:48 am »
V vs U for voltage is *potentially* confusing.

That's shocking.
Jokes like that go in cycles. It's just a phase.
 
The following users thanked this post: PlainName


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf

 

-->