Hello,
the 10 Ohms resistor in series to the heater of the LM399 in some designs did not get out of my mind.
I decided to make some measurements on PSRR (power supply rejection ratio)
with different resistors in series to the heater.
I choosed 0 R, 10 R, 22 R and 47R.
From my LM399 ageing box I decided to choose LM399#13 (see April 9.th) it is the one which has the largest TC between heater off and heater on. Additionally I will do the measurement with LM399#14 which is the one with the lowest TC from heater off/on measurement.
Measurement conditions:
Zener in parralel with 100nF is supplied from battery with LT1763 stabilisation to 14.08V via a 6K8 1% metal film resistor.
Kelvin sensing of zener voltage with 2:1 precision divider and measured with 24bit ADC (LTC2400).
Heater is supplied from programmable power supply and fed via the chosen resistor to the heater.
47uF + 100nF additional in parallel to the heater (avoid oscillations due to series resistor).
Start was with 12V increments 0.25V to 30V. Then back to 9V and finally increasing to 12V again.
X-axis is heater voltage
left Y-axis is 2:1 divided zener voltage in mV (red dotted line)
right Y-axis is local PSRR gradient in ppm/V (green dots)
(But due to measurement noise the PSRR gradient is nearly not usable)
Here the results for LM399#13:
Amazingly this device cannot read the datasheet
The heater should work downto 9V if used without series resistor.
But below 9.1V there is a large change in zener output voltage.
Of course with additional series resistor the minimum working voltage has to be increased.
I decided to "zoom" and cut off the "odd" measurement values.
Evaluation between 12 and 30V
0R: 34uV (17uV * 2)
10R: 37uV ignoring the "event" due to bad contact
22R: 38uV
47R: 37uV
So there is no enhancement in PSRR for the heater on the zener output with a series resistor.
Best seems to be when using no series resistor.
Since PSRR decreases on higher voltages the heater voltage should be choosen as high as possible.
with best regards
Andreas
Edit: continued on:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/lm399-based-10-v-reference/msg443181/#msg443181