@IanB,
Indeed a photographic picture can be 'pushed' and 'pulled' during transfer from negative to paper print.
I think the situation is a little different with X-Ray film as that is the negative that is used for viewing. It can be duplicated and the duplicate exposure changed. Paper based X-Ray imaging techniques use the image from the fluorescent scintillator plate and the exposure is set by the X-Ray illumination duration that builds the image. It is difficult to extract additional detail out of the final print if the exposure is wrong.
Don't get me wrong, I love analogue film. It wipes the floor with Digital in many cases BUT it does not offer the convenience of post exposure manipulation that Digital captures provide. CR plates are a hybrid that captures the image in the analogue domain and is translated to the digital domain by the laser scanner reader and its ADC circuits. That technology MAY offer the best of both worlds, but sadly the reports that I have received from users in Industry say that Film is still the best media for high resolution quality imaging. An example of such demanding applications is X-Ray imaging of gas turbine engine blades, looking for defects in the metals structure. Sometimes the old methods are still the best, if a little less convenient to the user.
There is also the issue of cost. As Industry knows, X-Ray film is expensive stuff and Digital methods have a high initial cost but the images are almost free after that. I say almost because most companies have an annual support contract cost to consider. This is why Dentists are moving over to the likes of the Gendex digital X-Ray sensors. Such sensors offer inferior performance to the film based images, but they are seen as modern, cost less long term, and convenient.
Fraser