Meanwhile checked them on my LCR meter.
These resisters are sold as being non-inductive resistors and probably they are.
Hi jebem
Have you updated the ZT-DQ02 to 1.0.8? I got mine today.
Can you tell me whether the measurement deviations were large after the update (say > 2%) and in which ranges?
I'm ask myself whether I should update from 1.0.7 and whether I should buy these reference resistors at all.
Won't a wire do for 0.01Ω?
Sorry for off-topic. It would fit better here:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/new-lcr-meters-zoyi-zt-dq01-and-zoyi-zt-dq02-(march-2025)/msg5958053/#msg5958053
Hi Aldo,
Just checked, my LCR meter shipped with V1.07. I just got it a few days ago and had no chance to evaluate it properly. I have an older Proster BM4070 LCR meter that serves me well, although without the precision offered by the new one.
As a general rule, one should calibrate the meter after each FW update, just in case.
I believe you can go back to v1.07, but a support call to the maker will probably be safer before proceeding with the rollback.
I bought the 0.1% resistors to have a reference to check my meters,
especially on the Alientek DM40, and to be able to calibrate testers when needed.
Problem is, as you noted, 0.1% is not precise enough if we really want to have the meter "calibrated" assuming the target equipment is precise and accurate enough to differentiate between a piece of wire and a low value resistor.
AliExpress sells precision resistors where a single one cost more that the whole lot of ten 0.1% resistors I bought.
I accept that 01% is good enough for me, the problem is that I can't be sure that all my 0.1% resistors are within the advertised tolerance.
What is the difference between a 0.01R resistor and a piece of wire?
Well, if the LCR meter is precise/accurate enough it will show the difference.
Different wire materials (leagues) and geometry (section, number of cores) have different resistivity and final resistance per length unit, and it will also impose a unique fingerprint in the form of parasitic inductance and capacitance.
In addition, each meter these days will have its own interpretation of reality, depending on the algorithm in use to "iron out" obvious wrong readings.
As an example, my DQ-02 will give kind of erratic values on low ohm measurements when using a 23 EUR Ziboo Kelvin test leads, while the stock included Kelvin leads will give almost stable readings (only the last digit keeps changing).
The above error varies depending on the used frequency and even changing level will result in reading changes.
See pictures. I believe this is related to the excessive inductance/capacitance of the Zeboo leads that the DQ02 firmware is not prepared to handle.