Firstly, Fluke 787 is a good meter but has been superseded by the 789 which allows you to loop power a 4 - 20 mA loop.
In your post you mention the following,
1. I just need to simulate the thermoelectic voltage of a thermocouple. The charts are online with the correlation of voltage to temperature. (roughly -10 to 30 millivolts) So I'm looking for a certified device to simulate those voltages and ensure that the temperature shown on the display matches what the thermocouple input is. We have some situations where our machines are having to run hotter than expected on the controls. The problem is either ground looping, or lack of noise immunity in the controllers. I believe the issue is with the grid, management believes its the controllers so frankly I'm about to spend 5k to prove them wrong. (there is also harmonics issues and low power factor issues involved here. this whole grid is just a mess frankly)
2 I would like the equipment we buy to be good for the long term, calibrated, certified, and able to grow with a rapidly growing company.
I would like to know if you hand write calibration reports. If so, what happens to them ? Does anybody review them ? Where and how are they stored ? In this day and age if a business is still relying on hand written reports for calibration of their equipment, the management is living in the dark ages.
You mention your test gear needs to be certified, calibrated and good for the long term and suitable for a rapidly growing company.
Are management interested in optimising the workplace and making profits ? If so there is only one choice, a Beamex MC6, the best multi function calibrator IN THE WORLD, bar none. It is a documenting calibrator which stores the result, tells you if your calibration result is a pass or fail and you store the results on a PC using the Beamex CMX software A report can be generated and printed out, listing all the instruments parameters, the calibration result, as found and as left calibration data, day date, year etc, the list goes on. It also gives a graphical representation of the result.
For T/C simulations the Beamex has reference or cold junction compensation, no need for an ice water slurry. Noah used that on his Ark !
Expensive yes, but worth every cent. If you are serious about getting the best results there is no other choice, cheers !