What's the problem using a smaller timebase and then zooming in?
Try it and see!
Normally you work zoomed in so you can see what's going on. Constantly thinking "Wait.... I have to zoom out before I can press stop then zoom in again" isn't a natural way to work. Natural is simply to press stop when you see something interesting then zoom out and see what was on either side.
There's also the problem that if the event was a one-off then you can't zoom out and recapture it.
Okay let me ask you one thing: you see something, and then stop and zoom in/out?
On what signal ?
On some fast repetitive signal,
by the time you see something and press stop, there was
thousands of triggers
passed by.One you saw is
lost forever. Zoom in or zoom out. Only way to actually catch a transient is to use Single mode and clever trigger...
If you use persistence, you might be able to observe something happened, but not catch it, Flash....
Try it and see!
On anything that repeats faster than once per second, your statement makes no sense.
Also, that Dave's video is not exactly thorough on the topic. Not his best work. In a video
talking about zoom, he
never,
not once actually used Zoom mode on
any of those scopes. He uses name "zoom" for changing timebase on stopped capture. While it changes displayed magnification, it is not Zoom mode, and not called Zoom in documentation for any of the scopes he uses. He also
never, ever, showed use of proper Zoom mode on
any of those scopes as described in manuals of those scopes. So people can see how that works, and weigh in pros and cons for themselves.
Oh, i
just realized, I wasn't right, if you
do see something flash on the screen, you
might be able to go back if you 're fast enough...
If you have one of
those scopes that have
History, you can go back hundreds of previous triggers, and if you are fast enough, you might go back in time.... And that is why those scopes have history mode. Because it is usefull.
Regards,