I'm new here and I definitely feel like this particular group is where I'll spend most of my time in.
I recently found a guy selling a TDS2024C in excellent shape for like $150 USD, and I have this soft-spot for products with crazy specs and then a massive Achilles Heel (in this case, sample memory).
Ironically the scope is already better in many ways than what I currently have (A humble DS1052E with hacked 100Mhz bandwidth, enough for a hobbyist like myself I guess) so I considered it at least 50% INGIS (Is Not Garbage, I Swear).
I also have a soft spot for yesteryear tech (I was looking for an analog scope when I found this one, but that's a completely different story).
One part of me says: You already have a scope that does most of what you need for analog work! And your "multi-channel" needs are ALL digital, so your cheapo USB logic analyzer is enough! Also 2.5K per channel? What's that? They'd get more memory if they used electrostatic charge to store data in the dust particles that cover the board inside, BECAUSE IT'S F*CKING ANCIENT!. A cheap $1 calculator probably has more memory than that.
The other part says: LISTEN, It's a 4-channel 200Mhz scope for $150 USD. Twice the bandwidth you currently have, twice the number of channels, and a fraction of what you paid for that Rigol. You'll never get a 200Mhz scope for less than that! It's also a rare case of an instrument with 99% decent specs and then this one massive fail. You LOVE those. By the way, have you seen the FFT on it? Yes, it sucks compared to real spectrum analyzers and decent scopes, but your Rigol's implementation of FFT is so bad, that I'm sure the first F stands for FAIL and the T is for "we Tried, sorry". If Fourier was alive he'd sue Rigol for misusing his name. At least this one is usable. (Psst: I also think you can bargain with the guy and get a lower price *wink*).
Guys, my soul hurts.