Author Topic: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)  (Read 29441 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11950
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #200 on: September 28, 2026, 03:01:02 pm »
And "four by two" is easier to say than 100x50.

True, but nobody calls them that here: they're two-by-fours. (Confusingly to those who don't handle them regularly, ackshooly 1-1/2" x 3-1/2", or something close to that. We don't have to go through the whole "they start out at 2" x 4" rough-cut before surfacing" thing, do we?)

I can assure you I have never in my life heard anyone in this country call them "two-by-fours". You have four-by-twos, six-by-twos, six-by-fours and of course various square sections. The larger number goes first. Always.

Your local usage may differ but that's how it is here.

US usage almost always has the smaller number first for rectangle sizes.
Besides 2x4, etc., photo print sizes are 4x5, 4x6, 8x10, etc.
Area rug sizes are 6x9, 8x12, etc. (feet).
An exception: 120 roll film (2.25” wide, often approximated as 6 cm) can be shot as 6x4.5, 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, 6x12, or other formats, depending on the camera (approximate cm sizes).
« Last Edit: September 28, 2026, 03:41:44 pm by TimFox »
 

Offline SteveThackery

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3379
  • Country: gb
  • 50 year novice
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #201 on: September 28, 2026, 04:59:04 pm »
I can assure you I have never in my life heard anyone in this country call them "two-by-fours". You have four-by-twos, six-by-twos, six-by-fours and of course various square sections. The larger number goes first. Always.

Your local usage may differ but that's how it is here.

Here in Britain we normally say "two-by-fours".
 
The following users thanked this post: tom66

Offline Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22441
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #202 on: September 28, 2026, 06:05:05 pm »
Quote
Whilst it isn't impossible the L was silent before English travelled to America and the Brits started pronouncing it, it does seem unlikely because that's not what normally happens. The idea that both pronunciations were common 250 years ago makes more sense.
As I already explained at least once, this word is documented as originating without it, and being relatinized later on in England.
Where? Apologies if I've missed it. I have reread this thread a few times. You linked to a Wikipedia page about the English Language Spelling Reforms of the 16th and 17th centuries. It doesn't mention the world solder specifically and it is only about spelling, rather than pronunciation. If some scholars decided to pronounce the silent L in solder, then how did is spread all around the country to the working class, at a time when there was no television or radio and many children didn't got to school? It isn't as though it's purely a word which only highly educated folk use. There would have been plenty of plumbers and craftsmen who learned their trade informally, rather than studying at university, who would have most likely soldered rather than soddered.
 

Online IanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13109
  • Country: us
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #203 on: September 28, 2026, 06:24:36 pm »
Where? Apologies if I've missed it. I have reread this thread a few times. You linked to a Wikipedia page about the English Language Spelling Reforms of the 16th and 17th centuries. It doesn't mention the world solder specifically and it is only about spelling, rather than pronunciation. If some scholars decided to pronounce the silent L in solder, then how did is spread all around the country to the working class, at a time when there was no television or radio and many children didn't got to school? It isn't as though it's purely a word which only highly educated folk use. There would have been plenty of plumbers and craftsmen who learned their trade informally, rather than studying at university, who would have most likely soldered rather than soddered.

It's quite the opposite. If you insert an L into the spelling of a word, then people will want to pronounce it. Scholars will keep the L silent, but the everyday working classes will start to include it.

You can see this today, with many people starting to pronounce the L in words like salmon and folk, both of which historically have a silent L.

I've lost count of the number of times I have heard people on YT say sal-mon and fol-k rather than sammon and foke.

I do not really know why Americans did not start to do the same with solder.
 

Online PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8845
  • Country: 00
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #204 on: September 28, 2026, 06:52:41 pm »
I can assure you I have never in my life heard anyone in this country call them "two-by-fours". You have four-by-twos, six-by-twos, six-by-fours and of course various square sections. The larger number goes first. Always.

Your local usage may differ but that's how it is here.

Here in Britain we normally say "two-by-fours".

We do. But when I did photography we called the plates 'ten-by-eight's. I think 'five-by-four' too.
 

Offline Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22441
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #205 on: September 28, 2026, 08:51:45 pm »
Where? Apologies if I've missed it. I have reread this thread a few times. You linked to a Wikipedia page about the English Language Spelling Reforms of the 16th and 17th centuries. It doesn't mention the world solder specifically and it is only about spelling, rather than pronunciation. If some scholars decided to pronounce the silent L in solder, then how did is spread all around the country to the working class, at a time when there was no television or radio and many children didn't got to school? It isn't as though it's purely a word which only highly educated folk use. There would have been plenty of plumbers and craftsmen who learned their trade informally, rather than studying at university, who would have most likely soldered rather than soddered.

It's quite the opposite. If you insert an L into the spelling of a word, then people will want to pronounce it. Scholars will keep the L silent, but the everyday working classes will start to include it.

You can see this today, with many people starting to pronounce the L in words like salmon and folk, both of which historically have a silent L.

I've lost count of the number of times I have heard people on YT say sal-mon and fol-k rather than sammon and foke.

I do not really know why Americans did not start to do the same with solder.
Exactly. That's why I find it perplexing.

It's not just that, but languages evolve naturally and are rarely controlled by the elites, especially pronunciation.

I've never heard a native English speaker pronounce the L in salmon. I've heard some pronounce the L in folk and yolk, which I consider to be a regional variation.
 

Online Analog KidTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4981
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #206 on: September 28, 2026, 11:41:30 pm »
An exception: 120 roll film (2.25” wide, often approximated as 6 cm) can be shot as 6x4.5, 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, 6x12, or other formats, depending on the camera (approximate cm sizes).

Yes.

Back when I was into wet photography (still have 3 good enlargers sitting in storage) I got into using 120 film.
I remember quite a while ago when it was usually referred to as "2-and-a-quarter", referring to the width of 2-1/4".
But I soon caught on to the metric way of describing the different formats, which is actually easier to use.
They're all 6cm wide (across the width of the film) but differ in height, with the sizes that Tim gave above.
My favorite is 6x9, which is a little bit wider in proportion than the standard "miniature" (35mm) camera format (24x36mm).
I also shot with a bunch of old folding plate cameras using sheet-film backs. The standard size for those was 9x12 (cm), a little smaller than our standard 4" x 5" format. Extremely high resolution if shot, developed and enlarged correctly.
 

Offline Geoff-AU

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 408
  • Country: au
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #207 on: September 29, 2026, 12:52:01 am »
It's not just that, but languages evolve naturally and are rarely controlled by the elites, especially pronunciation.

Language is one of the most common areas where if the majority continue to do the wrong thing, the dictionary updates to accommodate it and it becomes correct.

So if you're in the minority with pronunciation, you're wrong.  Simple as that.   :-DD  (300 million vs 8 billion... sorry USA, get with the program).
 
The following users thanked this post: PlainName

Offline brucehoult

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6464
  • Country: nz
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #208 on: September 29, 2026, 02:06:47 am »
Being down under clearly affects you.

In many very beneficial ways, especially in increasingly troubled times world-wide such as we've had since roughly New Year 2020.
 

Offline paulca

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6445
  • Country: gb
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #209 on: September 29, 2026, 08:03:36 am »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!
"What could possibly go wrong?"
Current Open Projects:  68000 Self Build computer + OS.
 

Offline brucehoult

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6464
  • Country: nz
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #210 on: September 29, 2026, 08:28:05 am »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!

Rhymes with "buoy", amirite
 

Online Analog KidTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4981
  • Country: us
  • DANDY fan (Discretes Are Not Dead Yet)
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #211 on: September 29, 2026, 08:40:25 am »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!

Rhymes with "buoy", amirite

Sounds like it rhymes with a sneeze: "ah-Chooey!" (with an extra fillip at the end).
 

Online PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8845
  • Country: 00
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #212 on: September 29, 2026, 09:09:16 am »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!

Rhymes with "buoy", amirite

'Buoy' is pronounced 'boy', innit?
 

Offline paulca

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6445
  • Country: gb
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #213 on: September 29, 2026, 10:15:54 am »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!

Rhymes with "buoy", amirite

'Buoy' is pronounced 'boy', innit?

Indeed.  But turned back on myself, you should have heard what I came up with for "Lake tahoe"  Ta-hooee!
"What could possibly go wrong?"
Current Open Projects:  68000 Self Build computer + OS.
 

Offline paulca

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6445
  • Country: gb
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #214 on: September 29, 2026, 10:19:45 am »
On "mute" L's.  The Spanish.  The number of places I have been where there are clearly L's in the place name but none are pronounced in Spain tops most other "L's omissions".

LIterally went paragliding in "Montellano".   Pronounced.  "Monti-ano."

There was another one, I'll butcher the spelling, but Collolyte.  Pronounced like Coyote.
"What could possibly go wrong?"
Current Open Projects:  68000 Self Build computer + OS.
 

Online Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2731
  • Country: ch
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #215 on: September 29, 2026, 10:31:55 am »
On "mute" L's.  The Spanish.  The number of places I have been where there are clearly L's in the place name but none are pronounced in Spain tops most other "L's omissions".

LIterally went paragliding in "Montellano".   Pronounced.  "Monti-ano."

There was another one, I'll butcher the spelling, but Collolyte.  Pronounced like Coyote.

This only applies to double “L”s, and it's always like that in Spanish.
Spanish “Ll” = ‘Y’ or “J” in English. Always, as far as I know.
 

Offline sanleontexas

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
  • Country: us
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #216 on: September 29, 2026, 01:58:12 pm »

And then there's 'andouille'.
 

Online Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2731
  • Country: ch
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #217 on: September 29, 2026, 02:34:45 pm »

And then there's 'andouille'.

Oh, another source of misunderstandings...  :-DD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouille
 

Offline brucehoult

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6464
  • Country: nz
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #218 on: September 29, 2026, 11:50:42 pm »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!

Rhymes with "buoy", amirite

'Buoy' is pronounced 'boy', innit?

In the British Commonwealth, yes, but seppos seem to say it boo-eee for some reason.
 

Online PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8845
  • Country: 00
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #219 on: September 30, 2026, 07:02:42 am »
I remember the shock I got when an American sailor hollared "Land Ahoo-eee"

I was like, WTF? 

Ahoy!

Rhymes with "buoy", amirite

'Buoy' is pronounced 'boy', innit?

In the British Commonwealth, yes, but seppos seem to say it boo-eee for some reason.

Weird  :-//
 

Online negativ3

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 582
  • Country: th
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #220 on: September 30, 2026, 08:27:49 am »
Then there's Arkansas (Arkansaw) and Finzean (Fingin) more dialectical oddities.
 

Online PlainName

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8845
  • Country: 00
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #221 on: September 30, 2026, 01:26:03 pm »
I think you might have meant to type 'diachronistic' in that one  :)
 
The following users thanked this post: negativ3

Offline sanleontexas

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
  • Country: us
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #222 on: September 30, 2026, 04:35:05 pm »

Could be, I didn't think anyone would pronounce it 'andoil' so wiki'ed it.
 

Offline sanleontexas

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
  • Country: us
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #223 on: September 30, 2026, 04:36:53 pm »

Drop the 'land' and I've heard people sound like that when they sneezed.

 

Offline Randy222

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1832
  • Country: ca
Re: It's "sodder", not "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)
« Reply #224 on: September 30, 2026, 07:16:23 pm »
Should the thread subject say "Is it "sodder" or "soLder", damnit! (for us USAians)?"

sodder I know used by sod turf people, the manager tells the workers "ok, sod'er up", and poof, a new lawn is born.

soLder I hear sometimes on car lots, ask the sales guy "what happened to that Toyota you had here last week?", get a reply "sold'er a few days ago".


 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf

 

-->