Author Topic: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters  (Read 240871 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5478
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #475 on: October 21, 2016, 06:35:49 pm »
I can do this test on my 34470A tomorrow
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 
The following users thanked this post: Alex Nikitin

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5478
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #476 on: October 22, 2016, 11:47:17 am »
Here you go ....

I did a 10k 4W Ohms measurement for about 1 hour each with my 34470A in 100 NPL

10k-Resitor_Environment-Noisy.png
This was done with some WiFi, Cell Phone and DECT phone in the area around the setup.

10k-Resitor_Environment-clean-1.png
For this test, the instrument was about 10 m away from any high frequency noise

There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 
The following users thanked this post: dr.diesel

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #477 on: October 22, 2016, 11:57:21 am »
Thank you! It looks almost 10 times better than my measurements, isn't it? Will give a call to Keysight on Monday  :( . From my measurements it is also well out of the noise spec, if I'm reading it correctly... .

Cheers

Alex
 

Offline dr.diesel

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2214
  • Country: us
  • Cramming the magic smoke back in...
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #478 on: October 22, 2016, 01:00:43 pm »
I didn't read all of the documentation, but does the 34470A average at some point > 10 NPLC?

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5478
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #479 on: October 22, 2016, 01:20:59 pm »
I didn't read all of the documentation, but does the 34470A average at some point > 10 NPLC?
I was not aware of this and I am not sure if this is the case.

Here are two more graphs of the same setup with the 34470A in the same noise free environment for 2.5 hours at pretty much 24.5 degrees C the full time.
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline Nuno_pt

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 435
  • Country: pt
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #480 on: October 22, 2016, 01:31:14 pm »
@HighVoltage 'n all what is the best way of connecting multiple GPIB to the same USB or RS232?
I've seen some images of male/female cable connected one on the other and then connected to a box, then the box to the PC.

Nuno
CT2IRY
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5478
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #481 on: October 22, 2016, 02:08:02 pm »
@HighVoltage 'n all what is the best way of connecting multiple GPIB to the same USB or RS232?
I've seen some images of male/female cable connected one on the other and then connected to a box, then the box to the PC.

I am using a Prologix GPIB to USB adapter and the free RF-Scientific logger software.
You need to have a few of the GPIB to GPIB connecting cables as well. I have lots of them.

Prologix:
http://prologix.biz/?sef_rewrite=1&gclid=CMTS_ePK7s8CFcGfGwodELwHCQ


RF-Scientific
http://rfscientific.eu/rf-scientific-gpib-logger-v10


There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 

Offline Nuno_pt

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 435
  • Country: pt
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #482 on: October 22, 2016, 02:18:00 pm »
@HighVoltage, thanks.

The cables must be like the HP10833 since it can stack 2 or 3 on top of each.
I was also looking at GPIB-LAN or GPIB-Ethernet.
Nuno
CT2IRY
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5478
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #483 on: October 22, 2016, 02:20:57 pm »
Back to the 10k measurements

Just for kicks, I did the same test on my Keithley DMM7510
Here are the results with a 10 NPLC setting.

Disregard the last spike in the graph, that was caused by touching the cables.

There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 
The following users thanked this post: dr.diesel

Offline dr.diesel

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2214
  • Country: us
  • Cramming the magic smoke back in...
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #484 on: October 22, 2016, 02:35:53 pm »
That spike kills the stats, but looks good!

(Never thought I'd appreciate built-in graphing so much) 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2385
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #485 on: October 22, 2016, 03:35:46 pm »
Here are my measurements, 34465A, 4W OCOMP, NPLC100, no ACAL, warm up curve, from cold start, 14h.
It's done on VHP202Z, 10k reference resistor, with proper cables.

After 1/2h, instrument is mostly warmed up, then between 1h...14h there's a drift of about 2.5ppm.
The main spacing in the xls diagrams is 1 ppm.

Standard deviation, i.e. rms noise, measured over the last hour is about 0.13ppm

I assume, that there might be a switch mode power supply or similar in your room, or your resistor is not properly connected.


What's this strange resistor, you are using? Didn't find it anywhere.
Do you have a photo of your setup?

Frank


« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 07:56:35 am by Dr. Frank »
 

Offline HighVoltage

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5478
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #486 on: October 22, 2016, 03:40:07 pm »
Just for completeness, here are some more screen shots from the DMM7510, as a statistical reference.
This time I was careful not to touch the cables.
What is just really stupid on the Keithley is the numbering to the left of the graph.
May be Keithley did not expect us to use it for precision measurements?

And yes, Dr.Diesel the graphing functions of these great meters are something one can get really fast used to and never wants to miss again.

« Last Edit: October 22, 2016, 03:41:47 pm by HighVoltage »
There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who can count and those who can not.
 
The following users thanked this post: dr.diesel

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #487 on: October 22, 2016, 04:06:10 pm »

I assume, that there might be a switch mode power supply or similar in your room, or your resistor is not properly connected.


What's this strange resistor, you are using? Didn't find it anywhere.
Do you have a photo of your setup?

Frank

I don't have problems with other meters (HP3458A and Keithley 2000) in the same lab, and I don't have problems with voltage measurements on the 34465A. The resistor I've used (LT450C) is this one , in a metal enclosure and connected with short twisted pairs and gold plated beryllium copper plugs.

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: October 22, 2016, 04:25:47 pm by Alex Nikitin »
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2385
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #488 on: October 22, 2016, 08:05:26 pm »
Here is a graph with a 2 hour run using my LTC450C 10K "standard" (measured by HP3458 about a week ago and by Keysight 34465A today) . Overnight variations were even larger - about 25ppm p-p. Is this a typical behaviour for the 34465A ?

Cheers

Alex

This size of fluctuation, about 1ppm, up to 25ppm, has nothing to do with "noise". If your instrument would be the root cause, this would really be a defect of its Ohm circuitry.
But I doubt that. At least, I can't imagine the electrical failure mode, which would create such a failure picture. The Ohm circuit is assumed to be the very same as the one inside the 34410/411, and we've never seen a similar failure. It's also quite improbable, that the 34465A as a new instrument would fail, or you know already, that you somehow damaged the Ohm circuit by external overvoltage; which is also lesser probable to cause a failure, by the instruments protection circuitry.

Your resistor assembly, anyhow looks as to tend more probably to fail:
It has no 4W connection, so you will have to make 4W measurements artificially on these two jacks.
I don't know the quality of your cables, but broken cables or oxidized connectors might also create such failures.

You have used 3x 100M as trimming resistors. This gives about 33ppm change of 10kOhm, and that's in the exactly same ballpark as the ~25ppm you observe as fluctuations. That alone makes me suspicious.
Resistors in the high MOhm values are usually unstable, especially these thin film or coal film types, and tend to fail fatally. (which type are these, actually??)
Maybe there's a cold solder junction, or a crack inside these resistors, which create these fluctuations.

Then you mentioned, that you drilled the cables. What kind of isolation do these have? Which cables are paired?
If you drilled Sense+ and Sense-, and your cables have a poor isolator like PVC, this will create big errors by leakage, on the order of many ppm, and also depending on the moving of these cables.
If these are isloated by TF, it's better, but otherwise, you have to separate cables, which are on positive and negative potential.

Then you said, that you measured this resistor OK with the 3458A, but one week BEFORE this measurement.
Therefore you can't be sure, that your resistor assembly did NOT go defect in between.
If you re-measure with the 3458A NOW, maybe it also shows this fault.

I only can hint to my own experience, being tricked by the resistor DUT itself.
Comparing Ohm measurements (on 100k) of 34465A vs. 3458A, which differed by about 30ppm also, I thought, that my 3458A would be defect!

In the end, it turned out that the DUT  showed a dielectric relaxation effect, which I discovered only by the different OCOMP timings of both instruments.

So, purely from a logical aspect, I propose that you look for the fault at the more probable resistor, than at the less probable 34465A.

Maybe you have another stable 10k resistor, which you can test. 1k and 100k resistors also might do the job, as it's only another range. A simple thin film 10k resistor would show a big, but smooth temperature drift, but no fluctuations.
Or you simplify the DUT by measuring the precision resistor 'naked', as I have done; and by simplification, I finally found the root cause.

Frank
« Last Edit: October 22, 2016, 08:16:43 pm by Dr. Frank »
 

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #489 on: October 22, 2016, 09:16:32 pm »
Hi Frank,

Thank you for such a long and thorough post. I can say that:

1) I've observed these fluctuations first on an overnight run with a completely different resistor (10K UPW25 wire-wound), just plugged in with it's leads formed to fit with some force into the meter's sockets, in 2-way mode. I've suspected the resistor first and repeated the measurements with my reference in  4-way connection and got the similar variations, I also connected the UPW resistor in 4-way configuration by soldering the wires to it. Same results.

2) My reference resistor was modified after I took that picture but before if was measured again with the HP3458A. The chain of three small 100M resistors was replaced by a quality thin film 1% 100ppm/C 300M resistor.

3) As I've mentioned, if I run ACAL at a point where the measured value is 10-15ppm off, the meter gets to a correct value within 1-2ppm (usual ACAL variations).

4) There are no obvious sources of strong RF/EM interference in the lab, I work there all the time with fairly sensitive stuff (electometers and very high stability power supplies) without any problems. I didn't have this noise on the same two resistors with either HP3458A or Keithley 2000 in the same lab. I will run the tests again side by side when I get the HP3458A back from Keysight calibration lab.

5) I use Cat 6 network cable twisted pairs and beryllium copper spring plugs (which I found rather nice and inexpensive). I will take some photos on Monday.

So, I will double-check all my findings but right now it certainly looks like a fault in the 34465A .

Cheers

Alex

« Last Edit: October 22, 2016, 10:00:13 pm by Alex Nikitin »
 

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #490 on: October 24, 2016, 09:36:37 am »
Here is the result of a long run over the weekend (68 hours in total), 10K LT450C in a grounded enclosure, NPLC100, 10sec sampling intervals. I will talk to Keysight later today  :( . My two Keithley 2015 at home have less than 2ppm p-p noise on 10K resistor with NPLC10 + 10 averages (about an equivalent of NPLS100).

Cheers

Alex
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2385
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #491 on: October 24, 2016, 07:11:42 pm »
Just for completeness, here's another 12h run, after ACAL, and fully warmed up.
Apart from the initial fluctuations, the reading is stable to < 0.5ppm over 12h, StD measures 0.16ppm.
That's as should be, very nice.

For narrowing the error, I propose to check the front/rear switch by engaging it several times, and if this fault also occurs on the rear jacks.
Then, you might check the stability of the 10kOhm current source in 4W mode with another DMM, I think it's 100uA.

Frank
 
The following users thanked this post: Alex Nikitin

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #492 on: October 25, 2016, 04:29:48 pm »
Just for completeness, here's another 12h run, after ACAL, and fully warmed up.
Apart from the initial fluctuations, the reading is stable to < 0.5ppm over 12h, StD measures 0.16ppm.
That's as should be, very nice.

For narrowing the error, I propose to check the front/rear switch by engaging it several times, and if this fault also occurs on the rear jacks.
Then, you might check the stability of the 10kOhm current source in 4W mode with another DMM, I think it's 100uA.

Frank

Hi Frank,

Thank you, I will check the front/back terminals tomorrow. Meanwhile Keysight came back to me and essentially said that 25ppm variation is inside +/-35ppm 90 days specification for 10K range  :palm: . I did point out to them that there is also the specification on the noise for resistance ranges and for NPLC 100 and 10K it is 1ppm . Let's see what their reply would be this time... . May I use your graph in my correspondence with Keysight as an example of a healthy 34465A readings?

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 06:27:09 pm by Alex Nikitin »
 

Offline saturnin

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Country: cz
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #493 on: October 25, 2016, 06:01:18 pm »
For 34465A, 24-hour stability of 10K range is +/-25 ppm. Value of +/-35 ppm is valid for 34460A - they even don't know specs of their own products, lol.

Btw. I wonder where you found specs on the noise performance of resistance ranges? I can't find them...
 

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #494 on: October 25, 2016, 06:28:51 pm »
For 34465A, 24-hour stability of 10K range is +/-25 ppm. Value of +/-35 ppm is valid for 34460A - they even don't know specs of their own products, lol.

Btw. I wonder where you found specs on the noise performance of resistance ranges? I can't find them...

1) My error (already corrected) - they actually did refer to 90 days spec (!)

2) Here is the part of the data sheet for the 34460/61/65/70A.

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 06:33:14 pm by Alex Nikitin »
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2385
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #495 on: October 25, 2016, 07:26:52 pm »

Hi Frank,

.. . May I use your graph in my correspondence with Keysight as an example of a healthy 34465A readings?

Cheers

Alex

Of course.

Arguing with the RMS noise is quite difficult with Keysight, as everything is inside specification, even your fluctuating measurements.

Therefore, a comparison like this is good, better if you really find an issue like an unstable current source (check also other ranges), or a bad switch.

I can't complain about KS, they reacted very quickly to my findings about the 100V/1kV range errors, and even replaced the instrument for analysis.
In my case, these errors were also inside specification. James Durr did a great job.

Frank
 
The following users thanked this post: Alex Nikitin

Offline saturnin

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Country: cz
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #496 on: October 25, 2016, 07:37:58 pm »
@Alex

Aha, I see now ... but if I read the table correctly 1 ppm noise adder value refers to NPLC=1. It is 0 ppm for NPLC=100. (Do they really mean that there is 0 ppm noise with NPLC=100?)

As Dr. Frank wrote, 25 ppm variations you observe do not violate +/-25 ppm 24hour specs, so I think the only change is to blame ohm noise performance of your unit...

Have you measured what the short-term rms noise (sdev) of your unit is?
 

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #497 on: October 25, 2016, 08:23:54 pm »

Hi Frank,

.. . May I use your graph in my correspondence with Keysight as an example of a healthy 34465A readings?

Cheers

Alex

Of course.

Arguing with the RMS noise is quite difficult with Keysight, as everything is inside specification, even your fluctuating measurements.

Therefore, a comparison like this is good, better if you really find an issue like an unstable current source (check also other ranges), or a bad switch.

I can't complain about KS, they reacted very quickly to my findings about the 100V/1kV range errors, and even replaced the instrument for analysis.
In my case, these errors were also inside specification. James Durr did a great job.

Frank

Thank you.

@Alex

Aha, I see now ... but if I read the table correctly 1 ppm noise adder value refers to NPLC=1. It is 0 ppm for NPLC=100. (Do they really mean that there is 0 ppm noise with NPLC=100?)

As Dr. Frank wrote, 25 ppm variations you observe do not violate +/-25 ppm 24hour specs, so I think the only change is to blame ohm noise performance of your unit...

Have you measured what the short-term rms noise (sdev) of your unit is?

I read this "0" RMS noise value as <1ppm. Which is confirmed by Dr. Frank's results (sdev = 0.16ppm) .

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: October 25, 2016, 08:25:53 pm by Alex Nikitin »
 

Online Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1194
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #498 on: October 26, 2016, 10:52:13 am »

Arguing with the RMS noise is quite difficult with Keysight, as everything is inside specification, even your fluctuating measurements.

Therefore, a comparison like this is good, better if you really find an issue like an unstable current source (check also other ranges), or a bad switch.

Hi Frank,

Thank you, your graph and some additional information from me did convince Keysight and I'll get a replacement meter from Farnell sometime soon tomorrow. I've tried rear terminals and other resistance ranges today and get roughly the same "jumpy" results. Here is the graph from real terminals for 2.5 hours. Let's hope the replacement would be OK.

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: October 26, 2016, 11:09:22 am by Alex Nikitin »
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2385
  • Country: de
Re: Keysight's new 34465A (6.5 digit) and 34470A (7.5 digit) bench multimeters
« Reply #499 on: October 26, 2016, 11:32:16 am »

Hi Frank,

Thank you, your graph and some additional information from me did convince Keysight and I'll get a replacement meter from Farnell sometime soon tomorrow. I've tried rear terminals and other resistance ranges today and get roughly the same "jumpy" results. Here is the graph from real terminals for 2.5 hours. Let's hope the replacement would be OK.

Cheers

Alex

 ;D ;D ;D ;D

are you able to measure the current source in 4W mode? I'd be interested in this failure mode, as KS probably won't give a feedback.
Also, please save the serial number, so that you can see in a few weeks, whether your unit had been refurbished..

The replacement for sure will be as good as mine  8) 8) 8)
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf