Dr. Taylor:
Were you involved with the 892x series thermal rms meters?
Yes, I was a team member on that one. I designed some of the options and ran most of the design testing. It was discrete opamps driving a Fluke developed thermal sensor that was a great TRMS converter capable of large crest factor readings. The Senior Engineer that designed that discrete op amp taught me so much. It was really an impressive piece of engineering. It strikes me as kind of funny now because you can buy off the shelf op amps much faster, but at the time, the only way to get the bandwidth was with discrete circuits. We did funny things like sticking two leads in the same hole to reduce lead inductance. It had an interesting anti-log circuit on the DC side of the sensor to try to improve the settling time. I have a prototype 8922 in my garage. Haven't fired it up for years. One thing that is interesting is the dB conversion was handled by a custom chip, not a microcontroller. That was actually the last non-microcontroled instrument I worked on as I went on the 8060 after the 8920 series came out.
One interesting thing about that development was the enclosure. An industrial designer at Fluke came up with an interlocking design and we were told that all bench instruments had to go into them. There were 3 heights available. Anyway, the industrial designer didn't provide for any ventilation, so you had to hang a heat sink out the back just to cool things. The 8920 went into that enclosure. Also I had designed that prototype Power Supply I mentioned in an earlier post into that enclosure too and had such a huge heat sink on the back so there was barely room for the AC jack.
To Chris (mamalala), I'm sorry, I had nothing to do with the 8502, actually a different business unit. So I have no documentation on it. I was in the handheld BU most of my 8 years at Fluke. I do know that cal memory tended to be battery backed CMOS SRAM and I wouldn't think it would be complicated. But the SRAM used is probably no longer available.
To Napalm2002, This weekend I'll see if it survived my wife's purges. At one time I had a box of parts, enough to build several 8060s and I had IBM color cases. So if I do, we can work something out.
To Modemhead, As far as I know, the 8020 was the first with that approach. Fluke stuck to their guns with the side pushbuttons for many years, the 8060 being the final DMM in that form factor. It was the competitive Beckman line of DMMs that made Fluke switch to a rotary. It was considered more elegant. It certainly was better sealed.
To all: I'll check this weekend for what parts I have that would be useful for restorations. I mostly have parts left over from the development of the 8060. But I also have a few 8020 family parts. I may be willing to part with an 8060 or two.