That has a 7" screen. Wouldn't you consider it a huge step backwards?
with 2 GS/s (per chan?). Still if it was 2GS/s shared you'd see a difference in waveform stability when looking at fast signals. Keysight is not in the same instrument class
Siglent says FFT has 1 Mpts, very curious to test it
with 2 GS/s (per chan?). Still if it was 2GS/s shared you'd see a difference in waveform stability when looking at fast signals. Keysight is not in the same instrument class
The keysigth 1000Xs would be my choice if it were not for the (lack of) mem depth. And 2 1/2 channels, how cool is that?
Even the EDUX1000s' decoders fly, but yes that's ~ $448+$150 kopecks (+taxes?), a bit moar than a Siglent.
SDS1202X-E | EDUX1002A | |
Bandwidth | 200MHz | 50MHz |
Analog Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max Real Time Sampling Rate | 1GSa/sec | 1GSa/sec |
Max Memory Depth | 14Mpts | 100Kpts |
FFT | 1Mpts | 64Kpts |
Waveform Capture rate in normal mode | 100.000 | 50.000 |
Waveform Capture rate in sequence mode | 400.000 | NO |
Serial Trigger and Decode | I²C, SPI, UART/RS232, CAN, LIN (Standard) | I²C, UART/RS232 (Optional) |
256-level intensity grading and color temperature display | yes | Only 256-level intensity grading |
Vertical Sensitivity | 500 uV ~ 10 V | 1 mV ~ 10 V 500 uV (20MHz limited) |
Timebase | 1 ns ~ 100 s | 5 ns ~ 50 s |
Sequence function | Support, minimum dead time low to 2.5 ?s | NO |
History function | Support, maximum of 80,000 frames can be recorded | NO |
Enhanced / high resolution mode | YES | YES |
Trigger type | Edge , slope, pulse width, window , Runt, Interval, Dropout, Pattern , video (support HDTV) | Edge, pulse width, video (NTSC, PAL, SECAM and PAM-M), rise/fall time, setup and hold, pattern/state |
Auto measurement and statistics | Support 38 Types, 6 Types statistics info: value, mean, min, max, stev, num | Support 28 Types |
Pass/Fail (Mask Test) | YES | NO |
Interface | USB Host & Device,LAN,AUX (Pass/Fail,Trigger Out) | USB Host & Device |
Display | 7 inch (800*480), 8*14 grid display | 7 inch WVGA, 8*10 grid display |
Price | EURO 359 USD 379 | EURO 414 USD 448 |
There was a new separate thread created for the SDS1202X-E oscilloscope yesterday.
Maybe it is better to keep everything under this thread, as this thread was the first thread related to this new oscilloscope from Siglent.
Even the EDUX1000s' decoders fly, but yes that's ~ $448+$150 kopecks (+taxes?), a bit moar than a Siglent.And 50 vs. 200 MHz bandwidth, right?
If "fast decoders" vs. "4x the bandwidth" would be the only difference, I'm pretty sure I would opt for the Siglent, even if prices were the same...
Even the EDUX1000s' decoders fly, but yes that's ~ $448+$150 kopecks (+taxes?), a bit moar than a Siglent.And 50 vs. 200 MHz bandwidth, right?
If "fast decoders" vs. "4x the bandwidth" would be the only difference, I'm pretty sure I would opt for the Siglent, even if prices were the same...Let's see about that when the first in depth reviews are in. IMHO competing on price instead of quality is a sign of desperation. I think the market for low cost, low quality scopes has been pretty much saturated by the Rigol DS1054Z anyway. It seems there is a lot of interest in scopes which can do more and have fewer (no) bugs. See how many people jumped onto the R&S RTB2004 special offer even though it costs over US $2k.
Let's see about that when the first in depth reviews are in. IMHO competing on price instead of quality is a sign of desperation. I think the market for low cost, low quality scopes has been pretty much saturated by the Rigol DS1054Z anyway. It seems there is a lot of interest in scopes which can do more and have fewer (no) bugs. See how many people jumped onto the R&S RTB2004 special offer even though it costs over US $2k.
Let's see about that when the first in depth reviews are in. IMHO competing on price instead of quality is a sign of desperation. I think the market for low cost, low quality scopes has been pretty much saturated by the Rigol DS1054Z anyway. It seems there is a lot of interest in scopes which can do more and have fewer (no) bugs. See how many people jumped onto the R&S RTB2004 special offer even though it costs over US $2k.
That! ^^^^+1
And 50 vs. 200 MHz bandwidth, right?
If "fast decoders" vs. "4x the bandwidth" would be the only difference, I'm pretty sure I would opt for the Siglent, even if prices were the same...Let's see about that when the first in depth reviews are in. IMHO competing on price instead of quality is a sign of desperation. I think the market for low cost, low quality scopes has been pretty much saturated by the Rigol DS1054Z anyway. It seems there is a lot of interest in scopes which can do more and have fewer (no) bugs. See how many people jumped onto the R&S RTB2004 special offer even though it costs over US $2k.
On the other hand, the "bugs" topic is vastly inflated by a few users here.
they claim its a 1MP fft which it is. they never claimed that it is an 1M bins fft
Not sure. But easiest solution is to start using this thread again, as it is the oldest.
Here data sheet pdf until downloadable from Siglent web side.
Here data sheet pdf until downloadable from Siglent web side.
Thanks. Not sure whether this has been discussed before: How does the scope handle SPI decoding (SCL, MISO, MOSI, CS) with just two inputs?
Here data sheet pdf until downloadable from Siglent web side.
Thanks. Not sure whether this has been discussed before: How does the scope handle SPI decoding (SCL, MISO, MOSI, CS) with just two inputs?
view/download PDF data sheet
http://www.batterfly.com/PDF/Siglent/siglent-sds1202xe-datasheet.pdf