Contract Job - EEVblog: Making Shorts/Reels

[EEVblog]

I'm looking for someone to make Shorts/Reels from my existing content to go on Youtube, Instagram and Facebook.
YES, I know Shorts suck, but fact is there is a market for them.
For the last month I have taken all my old Youtube Shorts and reuploaded them on Instagram and Facebook, and the engagement has been very good. So I want to keep this going but I'm now out of shorts.
So I need someone who is skilled at creating engaging shorts from existing 16:9 content.
Of course there are countless people/companies who can do this, but none of them have any clue what my content is about. So I figure I'd prefer to try someone who knows my technical content and potentially what my type of content my audience would find appealing.

Here is a crappy example of one I created from existing content:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3mRFa3s0xq/

So if you have demonstrable skills in this area and are interested, please email me.

[RoGeorge]

...I know Shorts suck...

Well, not all of them suck:  https://duckduckgo.com/?q=women+shorts&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images 

[Zada Moore]

...I know Shorts suck...

Well, not all of them suck:  https://duckduckgo.com/?q=women+shorts&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images 
[I totally feel where you're coming from. Making those dope short vids requires some serious tech savvy and a whole lot of creativity, especially when you're working with existing content. Props to you for flipping those old vids and getting some solid engagement. If you need a hand, I'm totally down to help out. With my experience in dropping tech knowledge on YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook, I know we can cook up some killer short vids. Hit me up whenever you're ready, and let's get busy creating some top-notch content,

[EEVblog]

A profesisonal short company sent me these demos as an example of what they can do. What do you think?
Yes there are spelling errors, and yes they are a tad annoying. But remember, the entire Shorts industry is built on annoying.

https://youtube.com/shorts/OUEBO1rUphI

https://youtube.com/shorts/F1FcGX6laws

https://youtube.com/shorts/_SVDAPKEudU

https://youtube.com/shorts/nX118TzPUkc

[Georgy.Moshkin]

I think these are okay, especially if they can do a lot of them fast and cheap. I think it's difficult to make shorts from educational content.
How about making shorts from "wow" moments, disappointment moments, giggling moments. E.g. from oscilloscope and other electronics tear-down videos. I remember in some videos you was very surprised by some strange engineering decision on enclosures, PCBs, etc. Some laughable moments with medical device internals installed with lots of adhesive tape or something, don't remember exactly.
2-3 seconds of your reaction, 2-3 seconds then zoom-in on pcbs/something, repeat or continue this pattern.. make it loopable. I think I can do this, but I am only started last year, so my video editing experience may be not enough. Here are two examples of my shorts:

https://youtube.com/shorts/eJ7n36EY0x8?si=Z0PxDIGTUPcaky3L

https://youtube.com/shorts/b8hUDYYbfoA?si=qkPEy2LkqMnYA6SX

As you can see, no popping text captions, etc.. Too basic. But I would hire me or.. ask a short company to find these "ha-ha", "wow", "eh" moments in your videos, combine with zoom-in on actual PCBs, enclosures, schematics. Avoid explanations and theory.

[Smokey]

You could fill a channel entirely with shorts of Dave doing "Australia-isms" and have that get clicks without any EE content at all.

Wave that big knife around saying, throw in a couple "Bob's your uncle"s and "half a bees dick"s, and watch the clicks roll in!

Or hire a hot chick to dance next to the whiteboard while you explain what a JFET is.....

[Exwallid]

Your post about the contract job opportunity at EEVblog is like music to my ears! It's fantastic to see opportunities like this pop up, especially in a community where talent and expertise are valued.

[SiliconWizard]

Your post about the contract job opportunity at EEVblog is like music to my ears! It's fantastic to see opportunities like this pop up, especially in a community where talent and expertise are valued.

Uh huh.

[Bud]

A profesisonal short company sent me these demos as an example of what they can do. What do you think?
Yes there are spelling errors, and yes they are a tad annoying.

Are they for hearing impared people? What is the deal with the Karaoke dubbing?

[SiliconWizard]

A profesisonal short company sent me these demos as an example of what they can do. What do you think?
Yes there are spelling errors, and yes they are a tad annoying.

Are they for hearing impared people? What is the deal with the Karaoke dubbing?

I hate those shorts, but these demos are pretty much the epitome of what shorts are supposed to be like. 99% of shorts are like this, with the animated subtitles and loud voice (and often music.)

Shorts are primarily targeted at a young audience, binge-watching them on their mobile phones and with the attention span of a goldfish.

YT creators are pressured into making those, and creators offering no shorts will see YT "algorithms" lower the exposition of their other, conventional videos. Which is why most Youtubers feel compelled to make them.

[EEVblog]

YT creators are pressured into making those, and creators offering no shorts will see YT "algorithms" lower the exposition of their other, conventional videos. Which is why most Youtubers feel compelled to make them.

Both Big Clive and Fran have both commented that Shorts are getting more views and engagements than recent videos.

[abeyer]

YT creators are pressured into making those, and creators offering no shorts will see YT "algorithms" lower the exposition of their other, conventional videos. Which is why most Youtubers feel compelled to make them.

Both Big Clive and Fran have both commented that Shorts are getting more views and engagements than recent videos.

I'd be curious how "engagement" is being defined/measured here... does people flailing around on their screen trying to figure out how to work the damn thing when the video conrol ui is gone get counted?

[Bud]

YT creators are pressured into making those, and creators offering no shorts will see YT "algorithms" lower the exposition of their other, conventional videos. Which is why most Youtubers feel compelled to make them.

Both Big Clive and Fran have both commented that Shorts are getting more views and engagements than recent videos.

Likely the result of agressive pushing by the algorithm, not result of views by regular subscribers.
They can count me as negative 1 in the views total, as I consider shorts junk.

Edit: and sorry will not be watching yours either.

[EEVblog]

Both Big Clive and Fran have both commented that Shorts are getting more views and engagements than recent videos.

Likely the result of agressive pushing by the algorithm, not result of views by regular subscribers.

Probably, but if it's consistent then you can't blame them for continuing to chase an audience there.

[magic]

I suppose there are users who would never click to watch Dave talk about electronics for 15 minutes, but may click 15 seconds of highly concentrated clickbait.

Question is if for established channels this will translate into new regular viewers of existing content or permanent "shortification" of the channel

[RoGeorge]

If we jump from 15 minutes to 15 seconds videos, that is 60 times less.  At 30FPS, 15s means 450 frames.
If this trend continues, next jump will be to show only 7...8 snapshot pics instead of a 15 minutes video.