Back in the old days I spend quite some effort and money to get really high quality CRT monitors which had a super sharp image. The likes of 21" Eizo models with active deflection to get the image sharp right into the corners and LG Flatron have been on my desk. And ofcourse high quality VGA cables with seperate BNCs for each color. Blessed was the day I got a TFT monitor.
contrary to my experience. i didnt spend high end on CRT, they were all good enough... then came TFT age, CRT almost all (the good and big one) phased out from shop and it sucks, viewing angle of early TFT was too bad, dimmed or change color during photo editing, what made the pro difference though is the weight. but blessed to latest LCD/LED tech that viewing angle problem is no more.
Such a nice sharp picture. But then UI graphics designers came in and decided text should be unsharp again like on the worst CRT monitors. FFS!
we can make analogy between line/vector plot and Sinc plot, edgy vs smooth. without antialiasing/blurry effect, fonts will visible edge pixelization.. i dont have problem with pixelized font, but i think i prefer smooth edge one.
I have been working through the datasheets, user manuals, etc. for each of these units. There are a couple of specifications that I don't fully understand, and don't understand how to compare between the units:
History, waveform recording, sequence, memory depth - I'm not sure if some or all of these are the same thing, or if not, how they relate to each other. The Rigol specs are 25Mpts of memory depth and a max of 500K of frames for "hardware real-time waveform recording"; meanwhile, the Siglent specs are 50Mpts of memory depth and a max of 80K frames for "History" - but also adds up to 80K of "segments" for "Sequence."
Waveform update rate - the Rigol says up to 30k "vector mode" and up to 1M in "UltraAcquire mode"; the Siglent says up to 80K "normal mode" and up to 500K in "sequence mode." Do "vector mode" = "normal mode" and "UltraAquire mode" = "sequence mode"?
For either of these, presumably more is always better ... but how much difference do they make in actual usage, and when / where do they make a difference?
Hi,
Waveform update rate - the Rigol says up to 30k "vector mode" and up to 1M in "UltraAcquire mode"; the Siglent says up to 80K "normal mode" and up to 500K in "sequence mode." Do "vector mode" = "normal mode" and "UltraAquire mode" = "sequence mode"?
"Normal Mode" means normal acquisition at siglent.
In this mode, the scope achieves up to 120000 wfs/s under certain conditions (other than specified in the data sheet).
In "Sequence Mode", which is another acquisition mode, it reaches up to over 500000 wfs/s.
"Vector mode" is somewhat misleading, it is also the normal mode that is meant with the rigol.
"Ultra Acquire" is actually the sequence mode.
Unlike the Siglent, the rigol does not allow you to choose between dot and vector mode in the display menu; the rigol always has vector mode active.
The same applies to interpolation.
For either of these, presumably more is always better ... but how much difference do they make in actual usage, and when / where do they make a difference?
In practice, I did not notice any significant benefit when using ultra acquire mode with the rigol.
"Normal Mode" means normal acquisition at siglent.
In this mode, the scope achieves up to 120000 wfs/s under certain conditions (other than specified in the data sheet).
In "Sequence Mode", which is another acquisition mode, it reaches up to over 500000 wfs/s.
Sorry if this is an ignorant question, but is "sequence mode" the same thing as "segmented memory"? (the way that R&S, Keysight, etc. define it)
The "fast segmentation" mode on some of our scopes can significantly increase waveform acquisition rate, and that's why I'm wondering if "sequence mode" is the same thing
https://youtu.be/7KoMjKwI6qw?t=462
"Normal Mode" means normal acquisition at siglent.
In this mode, the scope achieves up to 120000 wfs/s under certain conditions (other than specified in the data sheet).
In "Sequence Mode", which is another acquisition mode, it reaches up to over 500000 wfs/s.
Sorry if this is an ignorant question, but is "sequence mode" the same thing as "segmented memory"? (the way that R&S, Keysight, etc. define it)
The "fast segmentation" mode on some of our scopes can significantly increase waveform acquisition rate, and that's why I'm wondering if "sequence mode" is the same thing
https://youtu.be/7KoMjKwI6qw?t=462
Yes, they talk about segmented memory.
Funny enough, in Sequence menu, you set number of segments ....
There is also always running History mode, where scope also, in a same way, also remembers all previous (to extent of available memory of course) triggered captures from normal running mode.
You can use it same as Segmented mode, except Sequence(Segmented mode) has advantage of much faster triggering.
I believe some R&S scopes have the same
feature.
I don't know if it is news-worthy or not ... but I have (finally) made my decision and submitted an order. Now anxiously awaiting my new DSO!
I don't know if it is news-worthy or not ... but I have (finally) made my decision and submitted an order. Now anxiously awaiting my new DSO!
And you have asked the seller to decide which model to send you, to keep up the suspense?
Maybe I should set up a poll - how many people think I went with the Rigol, and how many think I went with the Siglent?
My bet is the MXO 5
Edit: if I had to bet, which I don't, it would be the Rigol. And it would be a good choice. I don't think you can really go wrong here with the two options and your requirements TBH.
Here's a hint. I ordered it several days ago, but it hasn't shipped yet. Trying to be patient ...
With the release of the SDS800X HD series, there is no longer any reason to choose anything else.
Maybe I should set up a poll - how many people think I went with the Rigol, and how many think I went with the Siglent?
Please include option 3 for those of us who just blew in on page 33 and haven't invested any emotions in your predicament whatsoever
Whichever you chose, I'm sure you will enjoy it
Maybe I should set up a poll - how many people think I went with the Rigol, and how many think I went with the Siglent?
Please include option 3 for those of us who just blew in on page 33 and haven't invested any emotions in your predicament whatsoever
Whichever you chose, I'm sure you will enjoy it
3. Whatever. Good for you...
My apologies - clearly my attempt to be funny (entertaining? cute??) has fallen flat. Ah, well ... my spouse regularly tells me that I'm only half as witty as I think I am.
I went with the Siglent. I had hoped to be able to follow up my "announcement" with a picture of the box, but alas, they have yet to ship it.
My apologies - clearly my attempt to be funny (entertaining? cute??) has fallen flat. Ah, well ... my spouse regularly tells me that I'm only half as witty as I think I am.
I went with the Siglent. I had hoped to be able to follow up my "announcement" with a picture of the box, but alas, they have yet to ship it.
I also hoped to be funny.. So we have common problem...
Seriously, whatever the choice is as long as you are happy with it.
Hello,
@awakephd: I would have also ordered an SDS800X HD if I were you, unless your workbench was stable enough to support a heavy Siglent SDS7304A H12.
Have fun with your new device
Best regards
egonotto
Hello,
@awakephd: I would have also ordered an SDS800X HD if I were you, unless your workbench was stable enough to support a heavy Siglent SDS7304A H12.
Have fun with your new device
Best regards
egonotto
Certainly 10.6kg is getting up there but lighter than many old boat anchors.
I wouldn't care how much it weighs, as long as I had one.