Duck that noise. I can see a stack of Plano boxes; and if I had the money I'd TOTALLY be Sortimo's bitch. But no way in Hell I'm gonna buy a rollaway toolbox JUST for consumables. I gotta draw the line SOMEWHERE. 
I'm using Wham boxes (UK specific product) and 4.5x3.5" bags with chopped up amazon, CPC boxes and old lever-arch files as dividers:
They stack neatly and have absolutely no dead space which means they don't take a lot of room!
Old topic resurrected. Decided not to fish out for an LCR meter. The GDO is pretty damn good. Also I'm going to build the Jay_diddy_b ESR meter as mentioned on this forum over the next couple of days. Turns out, now I've got sorted, I actually have enough crap in stock to just build it 
The problem with that is not so much the tool itself, but rather standards. Most ESR meters are based on Bob Parker's design (Anatek "Blue" ESR Meter), and are roughly calibrated to match the curve used in his original tables from decades ago. As long as the device uses the same 1Khz frequency, the results can be adjusted in tables in the firmware to give valid, meaningful results compared to the same tables and to quality-manufactured ESR measurement devices made in the last 20 years or so.
The
results you'll get from the 5-transistor ESR meter are only useful as a comparison against a KNOWN-GOOD capacitor of similar voltage, capacitance AND tan Δ-Q/ESR rating; you can't expect it to give you results that are matched against even the Parker ESR tables (for comparison with other folks' results, for example) or against
the manufacturer's specs, which usually DON'T include ESR but rather Q and tan Δ as figures you can compare against a modern Cap Tester like the DE-5000. Even a well-stocked cupboard is unlikely to have an exact match for every common variant of even the most common values one is likely to run into every day.
THAT part is why I eventually wanted the DE-5000 or some equivalent; I wanted
a meter that would give me results I can check against a datasheet to KNOW if a cap is anywhere near what it SHOULD be, not just against some "folklore" ESR table generated 20+ years ago, before the advent of MMLC and other extremely LOW-ESR / Low tan Δ-High Q capacitors.
The only problem I have with mine is that I've been using the Atlas ESR70+ for over a decade;
it is MY OWN BAD HABITS that get in the way of me using the DE-5000 correctly and understanding the results in the proper context.
At least the $12 Atmega LCR meters are somewhat calibrated against Parker's ESR tables (Every one I've bought was pretty reasonably close, and within 20% of my Atlas ESR-70+); given the assache factor, I think they're exponentially a better value than homebrew.
You KNOW I'm the original "cheap bastahd". That 1/16 Scottish (always fighting with the "just generally a bastard" 1/16 Welsh

) REALLY shows his colors when it comes time to go shopping for multi-hundred-dollar tools.

I spent a LOT of time researching value vs cost.
There is no doubt in my mind, especially given the fact that you can get the full kit with good quality Kelvin-probe tweezers for $96 ($71 for the bare instrument), that the DE-5000 is an even better value per dollar
FOR THE ADVANCED USER than those cheap Atmega LCR testers.
I have similar clear plastic containers I use on my bench; over here they're marketed as shoe boxes. I've moved EVERYTHING to the transparent bins & shoe boxes, since labeling cardboard boxes simply doesn't work as well; you always wind up hunting SOMETHING you forgot to list, no matter how carefully you itemize.
Just stacked up on end, you can instantly get a "feel" for what's in each of the clear bins because you can see a small portion of actual contents.

I think this is as good as we're going to get until boxes inventory themselves and post the contents on a touchscreen.

mnem
