7
« Last post by shabaz on Today at 09:24:11 pm »
From what you mention, probably a VNA is way more useful. Agree it's not as convenient as a couple of of alligator clips to perform a measurement, but you'll get way more satisfactory results since you're measuring at the frequency you'll actually be using it.
I have a couple of LCR meters, plus other tools that perform similar-ish operations, but I probably use the VNA more often, especially if as you say, the frequency of operation is going to be much higher.
For toroid and air core, calculations can be fairly accurate, so unless even more accuracy is needed, I might not measure and just tune in the circuit.
Sometimes I might use ready-made inductors, e.g. CoilCraft kits can be handy, they come in tolerances like 2.5%. I have no issue constructing DIY inductors, and keep various ferrites and iron cores handy. For typical HF/VHF work, software like Coil64 is as accurate as is practically possible without electromagnetic simulation tools I think - I've had a good experience with that software.