As far as debunking goes, you are a moron who should spend less time on this forum than you do.
You're *this* close to getting banned. Stop it.
Can we at least lock this stupid thread? It's been going in circles for months now, it's not adding anything IMHO.
Can we at least lock this stupid thread? It's been going in circles for months now, it's not adding anything IMHO.
I don't get these bits, is someone somehow forcing you to click on it, there's many threads here I hate and think should be removed such as the Three Word Story, TEA, any with subjects of "Question" or "Help" I get around this awful problem by just never clicking on them.
Of course it would be different if ppl were killing each other or it was spilling into other threads, but as long as it's on topic and in the right group I can't see the problem me-self. As someone else said it is or was educational, and quite fun at times.
I don't get these bits, is someone somehow forcing you to click on it, there's many threads here I hate and think should be removed such as the Three Word Story, TEA, any with subjects of "Question" or "Help" I get around this awful problem by just never clicking on them.
Of course it would be different if ppl were killing each other or it was spilling into other threads, but as long as it's on topic and in the right group I can't see the problem me-self. As someone else said it is or was educational, and quite fun at times.
It is extremely rare that I ever suggest that a thread be locked, but when it is circling around and around and around and going nowhere except swapping insults, some veiled and some not so much, what is the point really? I mean yeah it's not that big of a deal, I never suggested it was, but it's a bit pointless IMHO.
I would care even less if I could put an unlimited number of threads on my ignore list but I seem to have hit that limit and every time I hit ignore on a thread it resurrects some other thread I have long ago ignored.
This is the dodgy tech section, expect actual nutters to show up here.
I mean, there's a recent thread here with a real free energy nut.
I worry that if this thread is locked, or the 3dfs guy is banned, nobody will ever hear from them again and we'd lose out on some laughs.
Now, conceptually, what is the pushback behind Task Oriented Optmial Computing. It is a software based computing method that can be embedded into any processor (replacing the existing software) and more efficiently manages the processor and is able to extract orders of magnitude more computing power from that processor. In addition, multiple processors can be paralleled together for even more computing power. This is the key to all of our technology, computing power.
Is the pushback here or further down the line?
That is just a load of codswallop!
How can you get more computing power out of a processor by adding your own software to ANY other software developed for that processor?
what software are you replacing?
So this is software from a specific manufacturer?
So what does this software do?
[...] is able to extract orders of magnitude more computing power from that processor. In addition, multiple processors can be paralleled together for even more computing power. This is the key to all of our technology, computing power.
Is the pushback here or further down the line?
I think one can start here. In my book, an order of magnitude is a
tenfold increase. Here the plural is used, so let's say at least 1.5 OoM (just to be kind).
That is a 30-fold increase in "computing power" for a given processor.
Sorry, but extraordinary statements require extraordinary evidence.
Application specific computer languages are one dime a dozen.
This might just be a communication and language problem.
I would say cdoerfler is not the right guy to speak to EEs, or like minded persons, but he should be well aware of this by now.
Words are important.
If they have such a revolutionary technology, they should also have someone that understands and can explain it in a technical way.
So what does this software do?
It is all of the software required to deliver the computing power that we have. The interaction with the processor and the data processing, compiler, etc.
What does the software that you are replacing do?
So what does this software do?
It is all of the software required to deliver the computing power that we have. The interaction with the processor and the data processing, compiler, etc.
What does the software that you are replacing do?
processes data, interacts with processor
And there ends your trolling. You can't/won't answer simple questions.