Recent Posts

1

Test Equipment / Re: New Hantek DSO2X1X models?

« Last post by Pin240 on Today at 07:41:41 am »

Working or not, after 3 boots (Wait until the second Hantek logo shows up, then another 5-10 seconds) the original file will be restored.

Thanks for the script

2

Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff / Re: No interrupt from AS6501...

« Last post by dietert1 on Today at 07:41:08 am »

The app note source codes are in C and C is portable. As a proof of concept you could port the app note to your MCU. Probably you have support for the peripherals needed (GPIO, Interrupt, SPI..)
Coding in assembler can be a second step once it works.

Regards, Dieter

3

Test Equipment / Re: Standardised Way To Test Oscilloscope Screen Update Rate

« Last post by tautech on Today at 07:36:43 am »

As you know display HW is different so some HW analysis should reveal the reason for apparently faster display rates in SDS2000X HD.

File convertor in the webserver virtual button is a little app to convert BIN files to CSV.
It can also be downloaded to USB from the Save/Recall menu to be then transferred and installed on PC.

Setting the LAN address requires clicking OK and reopening the LAN menu to see the IP DHCP has assigned.

With mouse plugged into the scrope the scroll wheel is available for making numeric field adjustments.

4

Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features

« Last post by eTobey on Today at 07:33:21 am »

Any advanced user with some active Math channels.

A few more words would have been useful, and would have sounded much nicer...

From the guy who always tells me he prefers short answers to long winded ones. 😉😉

The guy, that knows about the difference between sentences, paragraphs and chapters...

What about staying on the technical side, huh?

5

Test Equipment / Re: Standardised Way To Test Oscilloscope Screen Update Rate

« Last post by nctnico on Today at 07:33:21 am »

I am thinking about the purpose of the refresh rate.
Perhaps the screen refresh rate is less important than the ability to display the waveform appropriately – so a waveform with a 'glitch' repeated at different rates could be used to test for this.

Yes, in theory the display refresh/update rate shouldn't matter if the scope is designed to or set up to capture the thing you are interested in. Persistance is one obvious way to do that for example.
But often you are just causally using you Mk1 eyeball probing around, in whcih case you don't want your fast waveform capture rate hindered by a slow display update rate.

This really is a non-issue which has been discussed before. Any form of high-waveform update rate will have a certain amount of persistence time to make sure the signal stays on the screen long enough to be noticed. Think in order of magnitude of 200ms. Anything below is likely to be missed. If you think about it and think back about the relative long fade times of phosphorus used in CROs, you'll come to the conclusion that the display update period can't be a parameter in the process which shows the signal.

6

Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features

« Last post by eTobey on Today at 07:30:26 am »

How about making the tabs a tiny bit smaller too?

Not possible without sacrificing space needed for indication of channel settings.
BW limit, Hidden (but active) etc.

Based on your information, and what i found in the manual the statement "Not possible" is wrong. See picture.

7

Beginners / Re: How Current Limitation is happening in the circuit???

« Last post by ommsiva on Today at 07:28:14 am »

MAM,

PLEASE FIND THE ATTACHMENT

8

Power/Renewable Energy/EV's / Re: DIY Battery Bank from Recycled 18650

« Last post by nctnico on Today at 07:24:47 am »

Someone on facebook is selling these:

I attempted to let the seller know this is a dangerous build, but they don't seem to care.

I thought it would be worth while getting opinions (technical and rational) from the community so they can see that it's not just me being annoying.

What are your thoughts on using random batteries that are soldered together in this way?

Fantastic, if you want set your home on fire. This is wrong on so many levels. It basically goes against all good practises where it comes to building Li-ion battery packs. The fuses will not help against the number one issue: when a Li-ion cells goes off, the thermal runaway will ignite the surrounding cells.

9

Test Equipment / Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs

« Last post by shapirus on Today at 07:20:28 am »

Rigol can go to 100MHz (or 125MHz) but is severely limited by its sampling rate.

Incorrect.

It can be unlocked to 250 MHz, which is actually ~290 MHz (-3 dB), and it has no aliasing issues at that frequency in single-channel mode (1.25 GSa/s).

With two channels operating (625 MSa/s), aliasing starts to become noticeable only after 230 MHz, but it remains still usable at 250 MHz.

The 100-125 MHz upper usable limit is only relevant when 3 or 4 channels are enabled (312.5 MSa/s sampling rate).

10

Test Equipment / Re: SDS800X HD Wanted Features

« Last post by eTobey on Today at 07:17:25 am »

Feature suggestion:
When choosing max frames for sequence, and changing the timebase, the lowest frames that were possible on the timebase persists, even when timebase changed back.

Suggested behaviour:
A number that has been entered or when choosed max, should always be set if possible. Maybe have 2 fields that says "frames set up" and "current frames" (max frames that can be setup) in the menu.