Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next
1
Test Equipment / Re: Siglent SDS800X HD Review & Demonstration Thread
« Last post by joeqsmith on Today at 01:14:16 am »
Showing the two peaks closes enough that the readouts will no longer resolve it. 
2
Although this forum has an overall laissez-faire attitude, it is far more restrained than other forums which I lurk at.
My personal belief is that real life already has its fair share of stress and complexity, to add a gratuitous quarrel with random strangers.
3
Test Equipment / Re: Siglent SDS800X HD Review & Demonstration Thread
« Last post by joeqsmith on Today at 01:09:35 am »
Channel 1 & 2 fed with a 1MHz 0dBm sinewave.   Math used to add both channels.  FFT then ran on the math channel.  This is about the limit of the old LeCroy.  It can display the separate peaks but the readouts will only display a single peak.  Again, wrong tool for the job but I am curious how well your scopes can resolve two peaks like this.  Feel free to use an external combiner rather than the math. 
4
Beginners / Re: Has anyone been successful selling products?
« Last post by nigelwright7557 on Today at 01:04:19 am »
These days it is very hard to compete with common items.
I find I do better with rarer more specialist stuff.
I can mark up prices a bit more.

Find a niche market to sell in.
5
Test Equipment / Re: Siglent SDS800X HD Review & Demonstration Thread
« Last post by mawyatt on Today at 01:02:51 am »
SDS2000xHD 1MHz -125dBm applied.

2N3055, thanks for doing and posting the measurements.  A couple questions and maybe a request, please, thanks.

1. Why is the amplitude measurement different with the 2kHD vs 3kHD?
2. What happens when you run the modulation test on the 2k?  Similar results but just takes longer to complete?

One is without and other one with modulation. Difference is about 1dB. I'm guessing it's the AWG when modulation got on.. I didn't care because what was important was accurate 6db relation.

On 2k looks pretty much the same and pretty much lasts the same, because at this settings most of the time is acquisitions and averaging not FFT processing time.

The sideband power in each is 1/6 the total (-7.78dB), which leaves the carrier at 2/3 total (-1.76dB), so would expect it to be -6.02dB down from carrier as you've shown.

Your impressive results at this power level with the SDS2000X HD and 3000X HD and followed up by Performa01 with the SDS800X HD :-+

Best,
6
I'm betting the OP is trying to make a holographic optic or a mask, in which case Op probably should stick to the laser for best spot size

Steve
7
Repair / Re: Can anyone help identify this ON semi IC?
« Last post by CountChocula on Today at 01:01:02 am »
Looks like it could be a MC14001 logic gate (a quad 2-input NAND, to be specific, which is the MC14011B).
8
Most popular chip for Hi-Speed USB is FX2LP. 8051 is inside of it. Any programmer was forced to use it, prefer or not. As a result, 8051 is well-known and easy to program. Example:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/programming/atmel-maxtouch-bridge/
9
Repair / Re: Tektronix DM501A repair
« Last post by David Hess on Today at 12:54:08 am »
my favorite [...] lubricant

What is your favorite lubricant, David? I assume we're talking about some grease of sorts, not just a thinner agent, such as an oil.

I have had excellent results with MG Chemicals 801B - Super Contact Cleaner With PPE (Polyphenyl Ether).  Its solvent is naphtha which is plastic safe, and the PPE oil does not creep across surfaces unlike silicone oils minimizing contamination.

10
Variable wavelength these days is AOTF, or PCAOM.  You can get 8-10 perfectly overlapping color channels at 80% or greater efficiency on the Polychromtic AOM with a multi-line laser source.  I prefer models by AA E or Gouch and Housego.   Gelbert, common sense genius that he is, was beat by Ted Maiman on the color diffraction with AOM.

For. Gilbert's version you need polarized light.

As you can get a metal halide short arc car headlight and ballast for next to nothing, that sure beats the cost of a lab grade Xenon Arc.

I mention this because the small arc still beats led in radiance..

The PCAOM on my bench tunes in 4 nm steps, used with a mixed-gas ion laser for color display.  I'm told AOTF can get close to 1 nm.

It's a great idea, thanks for mentioning it.

Steve
 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next