1
Beginners / Re: Checking for noise in resistors
« Last post by Calambres on Today at 06:23:00 pm »Very interesting those last two postings. Thanks!
You'll wish you either hand-placed the whole thing, or paid a fortune for a local assembly company.
What's wrong with docker? It actually provides a way to create an abstraction layer to decouple the software in question from the host OS, thus helping to solve dependency issues
* Avoid dynamic linking, link statically if possible, and therefore:How does the latter follow from the former? If you link statically, you don't care about dependencies.
* Avoid library dependencies like plague;
By using libraries, you avoid reinventing the wheel and avoid making dangerous mistakes.
I meant I get a clean sine wave up to 841MHz.I've been able to do that that too. Well, I only went to 840MHz.
I meant I get a clean sine wave up to 841MHz.I've been able to do that that too. Well, I only went to 840MHz.
Not easy working with small squeeges to fit between components but probably easier and cheaper than what OP was considering: using small stencils.
I guess, if I feel like procrastinating something else, I could do that. We'll see. 😉I'd love to play, but I don't have one of these scopes. I have an SDS2504X+ 500MHz scope.Well, it would still be an interesting data point. What's the lowest samples/sec rate it can do? The idea is to set it to the lowest sampling rate and connect it to a source that outputs a frequency sweep in the range from ~20% to ~60% of the sampling rate.
We can then speculate if the Siglent's 800 HD series have the same wave reconstruction implementation as yours, or not .
I can sweep up to 841MHz on my scope with the TinySA Ultra.It can actually output up to 5.4 GHz (or at least so the specs say), but it switches from sine to square wave above 800 MHz.