1
Buy/Sell/Wanted / Re: Canceled Because Thread All Shit Up by "tggzzz"
« Last post by tggzzz on Today at 08:50:27 pm »That 3.5 digit meter remark was pretty nastyThat is a misrepresentation.
The actual remark includes an important caveat, highlighted for convenience: 'If you limited the claimed to, for example, "...verify the function of 3.5 digit Digital Multimeters", then the points wouldn't even arise.' https://www.eevblog.com/forum/buysellwanted/fs-affordable-dmm-checkers-ac-reference-dc-reference-ohms-reference-etc/msg5465140/#msg5465140
That gave him the perfect opportunity to point out that his device was better than 3.5digit. He chose not to. Why?
Quote
after he had explained that he was using 6.5 meters with fresh calibration. So 5.5 digits would have been a realistic estimate.
I cannot see any 6.5 digit statement of the OP's. Where is it? When was it made?
Note also that after the sale the OP sends documentation that the claims are based on operating in an unrealistic single exact environment "...no-draft ambient of 78F and 60% humidity." https://www.eevblog.com/forum/buysellwanted/fs-affordable-dmm-checkers-ac-reference-dc-reference-ohms-reference-etc/msg5465119/#msg5465119 Ensuring operation in such a precise environment would be very expensive and difficult; it would be cheaper to buy a more expensive well-specified and characterised voltage source.
Quote
I think there is a good reason for somebody looking for alternatives instead of paying collectors prices for legacy equipment with unknown history.
I agree - as my statement above demonstrates.
But that was not claimed in the adverts, so I don't think you have a point.