1
Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff / Re: more modern version of tl494?
« Last post by Doctorandus_P on Today at 10:29:41 am »What's wrong with the tl494?
this is +1 imho in rigol, lets not forget, the 2 scopes discussed here got pros and cons.Since the Siglent can into 2 Gsa/s, it could potentially be modded to support at least 800 MHz single-channel bandwidth, if there are no further limitations in digital signal processing and/or software. I don't recall anyone mentioning or trying this though.
P.S. If anyone understand the reason that at Nexperia's datasheet referred the term Vsw (or the Vsw is the same thing with Vis in essence?) and if there is any practical purpose of it... please tell it.
not everybody like to connect to network for a mere screen capture, i do it with usb stick. my ethernet cable is super long and its quite a mess trying to run it to my dso, at my lab setup, connecting to usb cable is much easier. and that luckily i have ethernet cable at all so i can do some adb hack albeit a bit inconvenience. ymmv.Well, installing a modded apk already requires a certain level of involvement, way beyond a normal user's one, and of course there's a certain learning curve. Disabling apk signature verification is not much farther than that (especially since a respective modded .jar that can be used without having to build your own is available).
iircsomeone stated dho800 only works on specific brand. i have few wifi adapter here, maybe later i will try. but still, its a few more steps to do... rather than plugin usb stick and hit capture button. ymmv.Cable? My WiFi adapter cost me $7...Screen capture over network still works even on an unsigned app.not everybody like to connect to network for a mere screen capture, i do it with usb stick. my ethernet cable is super long and its quite a mess trying to run it to my dso, at my lab setup, connecting to usb cable is much easier. and that luckily i have ethernet cable at all so i can do some adb hack albeit a bit inconvenience. ymmv.
BTW, speaking of signal integrity, the (unlocked) Rigol can more or less properly show signals at up to 500 MHz at 1.25 Gsa/s (the 2.5x ratio again btw), albeit with a greatly reduced amplitude, apparently because of the hardware low-pass filter on the input.this is +1 imho in rigol, lets not forget, the 2 scopes discussed here got pros and cons.
2n**55 only showed one successsful case at Sr / 2.27, but i bet anything lower freq than that will be better, the only thing is at when higher freq will start wobbly up to extreme 250MHz.In reply #465, 2N3055 showed stable reconstruction of a 220 MHz sine which was sampled at 500 MSa/s. So the SDS800X HD can still resonstruct properly at a sampling rate of less than 2.5x of the signal frequency, while the Rigol started to show wobbles at 3x or so.I'd like to see a frequency sweep.
The Rigol is applying the theory correctly and the Siglent can't possibly be doing an infinitely wide reconstruction, so...i havent seen that proven, in fact shapirus proved that otherwise. dont show too much of fanboyism, we trust more scientific facts rather than sentimental facts we have saying/joke in our medsos group, if we have stupid in ourself, its ok, but dont reveal it too much, keep it some for next generation no pun/insult intended cheers.