Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next
1
RF, Microwave, Ham Radio / Biquad yagi design?
« Last post by cadr on Today at 01:45:03 am »
Does anyone have any references to designing Biquad Yagi antennas?
2
I'm into the habit of winding back brightness to 80%.......for no good reason other than not needing full brightness.
3
Beginners / Jutter calculation ?
« Last post by GigaJoe on Today at 01:40:19 am »

I'm right ?
Jitter 1.5 nS
or it should be divided in 2 -- 750pS



 
4
yeah its for 3d objects what I mean is if you use a stereo microscope and then you get a high zoom one (in the 1000$ range) it gets worse the more you go

I think its extremely useful. i mean you either can see it or not see it. with how small everything got, you basically won't say that its a waste of money

100x lets you look at 1 number on a penny. thats still not that small. for really looking at a 0402 part its not like its a bad buy

You just won't see the problems without zoom. see no evil there is no evil? ???


but there is a problem, the rail microscopes are god damn huge
5
Hello, we could custom and manufacture most conplicated wire bonding tool
any interest, please visit https://www.bondingwedges.com/
6
I've replaced a a large number of them in flat screen televisions. LED's don't last as long as it is commonly believed.

WoD
So have I, but indeed in TVs, especially the cheap ones. they (can) overdrive them for brightness (which people seem to abuse).  There's no excuse for that in a scope screen where you are viewing a subdued image and from a meter distance or less.

Actually, what I replace most in TVs are capacitors in the power supplies.  Again, mostly in the cheap ones.
7
I fully agree that for soldering and similar fabrication, moderate magnification is adequate. When it comes to failure diagnosis, the need to identify tiny cracks or voids may require magnifications without limits, including the use of electron microscopes. Additionally, in the past, when manual wire bonding was still common, magnifications within those ranges were indeed useful.
8
Asan is much faster and easier to use than Valgrind. But it won't show much if the stack uses one big allocation and then uses allocated chunk for the custom allocator. It will catch gross out of buffer access, of course.
9
Oscilloscopes are for displaying signal waveforms, not creating them.

At least add that this is a job for a pulse generator or a fancy function generator and save me some typing :)   
https://www.edn.com/create-short-pulses-with-a-function-generator/
10
Test Equipment / Re: Siglent SSA 3021X... Ooops
« Last post by tautech on Today at 01:21:11 am »
Hi,

I think I accidentally overloaded the input to my SA one too many times. My input impedance is no longer 50 Ohms. It still functions sortof.

I took the input board out and started looking around. I saw a 49R9 resistor which I assume is the termination resistor, it actually measures fine. I it looks like there are some clamping diodes on the input path and they seem fine. the input cap measures at 1uF, seems OK. Nothing looks like it got toasty.

The first IC in the input path is U1 a 956p, the 49R9 resistor is after that component in the path. Makes me wonder if that is the part I damaged.

I can't find any info on what that part is, anyone here know? Has anyone found schematics for this SA?

After some research, I believe the part is a GaAs MMIC. Still can't find a datasheet for the 956P to be sure.

Thanks
Joel
Sanity check:
Preset.
Connect TG to RF IN and apply -20dB TG signal.
Sweep should be at a -20dB level.

Post screenshot.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next