Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next
1
RF, Microwave, Ham Radio / Re: Cascade RF Frontend 2.4GHz possible?
« Last post by vk4ffab on Today at 07:59:48 am »
Please see attachments for Front, back side and the circuit I want to use.

My gut says, nope, bad idea. The RF in and Antenna ports have maximum ratings of 5dbm into them and you want to blast almost 1/2 a watt into it. BOOM dead chip. Just buy a new router.
2
I have the ZB3530HL & have attempted to use the software provided for the ITECH RF-A350. The software connects ok (the ZB3530HL displays "PC Link" on the LCD). I'm using a USB-Serial lead on Windows 11. When I press "Run" with a suitable configuration, the machine does nothing & the "Now" section at the top shows nothing in the Temperature field. I've tried with flow control & as admin.

I've tried searching for an answer online to no avail. Has anyone been able to get this working successfully & what's the trick?

Pete

I've been meaning to try the PC software myself, so last night I asked ITECH for the RAR file password and today I hooked up a laptop with a USB to RS232 cable and the cable provided with the oven.

I started the software, selected COM4, and clicked Open to open the port, then click Link and I for the same "PC Link" message on the oven LCD.  That is a good sign it is communicating.

I entered some reflow parameters (similar to the built-in Curve 4 that I've been using) and hit Run.  Everything worked as expected, with the set points and hold times as specified.

Screenshots attached.  The Y axis of the graph is 25C per div, and X axis is 45 seconds per div.

My main complaints are:
- You can only specify set point and hold times, but I guess that makes sense as it can only ramp up or down so fast.
- It is quite slow in the cooling phase, taking 9 or 10 minutes to cool to 100C in my case unless I open the door.  Would be nice if it ran the fan faster.
- The PC software is really basic.
- The graphed temperature curve is restarted if the time exceeds the full width (900 sec/15 mins) which my settings do (only just).
- The graph also blanks after the run is complete.
3
How does this look to you?

I added a plastic washer under that screw on mine.
Allthough it does not answer my question, it is still a good suggestion.  ;D

To me it looks like "Guys... we fucked up. How can we fix it? ... we are lucky, there are no traces, and we can just drill a hole."

How are these BNC sockets held in place? Just by those connections?

I was just about to order this product, when i saw this. Now i ordered a Rigol for the same price.
4
With mouse plugged into the scrope the scroll wheel is available for making numeric field adjustments.

That's interesting, must not have implemented that in the web interface
5
This really is a non-issue which has been discussed before. Any form of high-waveform update rate will have a certain amount of persistence time to make sure the signal stays on the screen long enough to be noticed. Think in order of magnitude of 200ms. Anything below is likely to be missed. If you think about it and think back about the relative long fade times of phosphorus used in CROs, you'll come to the conclusion that the display update period can't be a parameter in the process which shows the signal.

Sure, but why does any scope update the display faster than 200ms then?
I for one prefer the apparent faster updating of the 2000 vs the 1000
6
Microcontrollers / Re: SD Card reliability in SPI mode
« Last post by TizianoHV on Today at 07:54:59 am »
I've used a 2GB Kentron and a 8GB Kingston micro SD card + SdFat for my datalogger (Arduino nano every).
I wrote into the same cards for weeks, 50 times per second (2kBytes/s), multiple times without any issue.
Maybe smaller cards are better for such applications?

Code: [Select]
...
dataFile = SD.open(filename, O_CREAT | O_APPEND | O_WRITE); //Open file only once
...

while...{
  ...
  dataFile.println(dataString);
  SDbuffCount++;
  if(SDbuffCount > SDbuffDim){
      dataFile.flush();        //Flush, up to 5 times per seconds
      SDbuffCount = 0;
  }
}
dataFile.close();
7
Test Equipment / Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Last post by Fungus on Today at 07:53:03 am »
Can the TSA do amplitude modulation?
Put in some AM at about 10% of the frequency.

It only supports a limited number of amplitude levels (I think 8 or so) for the the modulating signal, so it's a "stair step sine wave".
And the modulating signal is limited to 10 kHz.

EDIT: See also Erik's video: https://youtu.be/U2cw0bmuSLM?t=239

The TinySA supports 8-point interpolation, while the Ultra can muster up to around 128 points depending on modulaton frequency.

Ok, no problem.

I'm just wondering how the Siglent is cheating to get that display. The Rigol isn't doing anything wrong, it's doing the correct math for the limited information it has.

The original Signal can be reconstructed with much wider filters but they'll only work if the signal is perfectly periodic.

I was wondering what happens if the signal isn't periodic. It could go very wrong.
8
... I ask because measuring cross section of a multi-stranded wire is not trivial at all. Which is also why, to answer your question: I have never checked. I think the risk of me measuring incorrectly would be larger than the manufacturer lying.

Current, voltage drop and ust a few calculations, and then you have the cross section. Nowadays with internet i would call this trivial.

I could not find the very same measurments, but i can give you an example, that is as good. (Scamed by the PCB manufacturer, as he did not mention a tolerance of 20%. Seems to be a chinese thing, yes).
9
Beginners / Re: LM317 Based Digitally Controlled Power Supply
« Last post by Kleinstein on Today at 07:50:02 am »
The circuit with the LM317 as a power transistor replacement would need a negative supply for the OP-amp. Otherwise it would not work below some 1.2 V and could not limit the current with these low voltages (e.g. with a short).
10
Test Equipment / Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Last post by Fungus on Today at 07:47:23 am »
There are specific posts in this thread covering most of this, but a summary doesn't hurt.

Rigol Pros: HDMI, VESA mount, WiFi built in.

Smaller size, battery option, more accessible UI, easy/neat Wifi with web/ftp access to the 'scope...

Rigol can go to 100MHz (or 125MHz) but is severely limited by its sampling rate.

Nope. Rigol can go to 280Mhz measured bandwidth, and shows signal far beyond that.

I wouldn't leave it at that bandwidth for general use but it's there if you need it and it only takes about 10 seconds to switch the model.

There's also 225MHz, 200Mhz and 125MHz options.

The lower sample rate sounds scary but when you're looking at real-life signals with probes clipped onto wires? Not so much.

(And there's no problem at all with 1 or 2 channels)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next