Meanwhile, there are some features that the Rigol brings to the table that I find attractive, including the slimmer size, possibility of powering from a battery pack, HDMI output, easy addition of wifi capability. VESA mount might also be valuable for my limited workspace.
The last feature I noted for the Rigol leads to the first specific question for this post: Have I understood correctly that there is no way to add wireless to the Siglent other than through the ethernet port?
Second specific question: I seem to recall reading something that suggested that the probes that come with the Rigol 804 are better (? or have a higher BW rating?) than those provided with the Siglent. Is that true, and should I care?
Third specific question: I think I would likely want to "hack" either of these units up to 100MHz and greater memory depth. From what I am seeing, this seems to be easier for the Rigol than for the Siglent - true? (This also connects to the previous question - if I want to hack up to 100Mhz, are the probes going to make that less successful with one vs. the other?)
I don't want to stop you from getting the Siglent because no doubt it's a great little machine, but I'll answer your questions regarding the Rigol, simply because I can. I've been using it for a couple of hours a day for the last few weeks and continue to be happy with it.
1. Wi-Fi - Super simple to enable this and remote web control is pretty good. You can access and adjust pretty much everything you'd want.
2. Bandwidth - the hack to 100 Mhz is equally simple.
3. Sampling rate limitation - I don't think there's any need to worry about all this talk of 4-channel operation being at lower sampling rate. Whenever you want to be sure of something, it only takes a few seconds to switch off the other channels momentarily to get the 1.25 GS/s, which puts you in the realm of 200 MHz, only to find that the waveform doesn't change and then you pull off the probe hooks and starts using the spring clip and realise that has 10 times more impact.
4. HDMI - I've done this into my 65-inch flatscreen and it looks pretty impressive, but Wi-Fi web control partly negates the need for the HDMI.
5. Hacking - I'm looking forward to having a poke around just for the fun of it.
6. Size - I didn't even realise it had a slimmer profile than the Siglent, but now I know that, I am happy I have the Rigol as I'm currently using it in an extremely confined space.