1
Test Equipment / Re: Choosing between entry-level 12-bit DSOs
« Last post by Fungus on Today at 03:33:43 pm »Simply put, Rigol hit a Home Run with the DHO800 introduction, then Siglent hit a Grand Slam with the SDS800 introduction
Yep, there's no way the Siglent boys will ever make me regret buying mine or that it's in any way insufficient for my work.
As good as the Rigol DHO800 is, and it's good, really good is every aspect, the Siglent SDS800 is just overall better IMO.
On paper, sure, but my question is how much of that translates into an advantage in practice.
Sure, there's some people who need 4 channels at 200Mhz over 50 Ohm coax that but I'm not buying that every single EEVBLOG member does.
I'm also not buying that those people wouldn't be far better off with a 2000-series 'scope at 350MHz. which seems to be an area where Siglent is supreme. "200Mhz" seems like a very arbitrary number to me.
So let's list the advantages of each and not try to say one is "better". Numbers aren't everything, one size doesn't fit all.
So when we reach for a DSO, now we reach for the SDS800, usually with the Rigol probes tho (these are really good, better than the Siglent IMO)
Rigol has their own ASICS so Siglent's margins are probably a lot thinner to be able to be sell at the same price point. Things like the probes will be the first to suffer.