hello
after a google search I found the forum and I appreciated this article.
if anyone can help me find the right card for the edit.
thank you
hello
after a google search I found the forum and I appreciated this article.
if anyone can help me find the right card for the edit.
thank you
Grab the 680, that card has been modded the most so far .
is that it will be a real Quadro K5000?
performance, quality ...
is that it will be a real Quadro K5000?
performance, quality ...
It will not be a real K5000 in performance and quality, but it should allow certain options not available to gaming (GTX) series of cards, useful for virtualization etc.
hello
after a google search I found the forum and I appreciated this article.
if anyone can help me find the right card for the edit.
thank you
Grab the 680, that card has been modded the most so far .
is that it will be a real Quadro K5000?
performance, quality ...
As far as I am aware, the only feature you won't get is the ECC memory...
Nobody (so far) has demonstrated that a modded 670/680 card can score the same as Quadro/Tesla/Grid in specviewperf11.
And that is the single most important reason why the pro cards are 3-4 times the $$$ of the GTXs...
As far as I am aware, the only feature you won't get is the ECC memory. Everything else will be the same, except maybe the clock speeds. Quadro cards tend to be clocked a little more conservatively. GeForce cards tend to be pre-overclocked right to their thermal and stability limits, and occasionally beyond.
Many people fail to realize that Nvidia is also reading the Web and following what is going on with all these mods. They did not sit idly for the 4xx to 5xx transition where the soft-switch mod stopped working. And with the 6xx series they've most likely added more roadblocks to prevent any entrepreneurial people from causing them any further revenue loss.
Doing this for them is very easy, after all they are the ones who engineered the chips and so they have all the information needed. We are for the most part tapping in the dark, finding things out through trial and error.
You are absolutely right, and nobody will demonstrate it, because the cards will not score the same.
I'd love to be proven wrong...
Oka-a-ay...
So, what is it that you think? It can be done or not?
You can't have it both ways...
As far as I am aware, the only feature you won't get is the ECC memory...Nobody (so far) has demonstrated that a modded 670/680 card can score the same as Quadro/Tesla/Grid in specviewperf11.
And that is the single most important reason why the pro cards are 3-4 times the $$$ of the GTXs...
Oka-a-ay...So, what is it that you think? It can be done or not?
You can't have it both ways...In principle, anything can be done and I do have some ideas to explore, just waiting for a GTX card to arrive in the mail.
I opted to get a GTX 5xx because interwebs say 6xx series appears to be optimized towards gaming and not business applications, and is sub-par in performance to 5xx.
How exactly do you figure the use case in which 1536 shaders is not at least as good as 512 shaders? I'm pretty sure a GTX680 will outperform a GTX580 in every way possible.
How exactly do you figure the use case in which 1536 shaders is not at least as good as 512 shaders? I'm pretty sure a GTX680 will outperform a GTX580 in every way possible.
Interwebs is your friend...why don't you do a search and find out. Bigger is not always better.
How exactly do you figure the use case in which 1536 shaders is not at least as good as 512 shaders? I'm pretty sure a GTX680 will outperform a GTX580 in every way possible.
Interwebs is your friend...why don't you do a search and find out. Bigger is not always better.
And I'm asking you to cite a well informed source with scrutinizable empirical evidence. Surely you aren't about to claim that "it must be true because I read it on the internet".
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/17
or if you dont believe that, then just google some more benches and tests.
Anyways, don't get offtopic please
What's mind boggling is that it appears both 6xx and Quadro Kxxx chips come from the same factory line and the former are just crippled versions of the later; or those that don't pass QA testing for pro-line. But, we've already discussed that here, in the earlier posts...
Two points:
1) What software do you use that is particularly well approximated with specviewperf11?
2) How much of a difference are we talking about? 300% difference, roughly equivalent to the difference in the price tag? I doubt it.