1
Repair / Re: Mig welder wire feeder controller board not working
« Last post by xavier60 on Today at 02:41:50 am »Where was the 24VAC measured? There appears to be a PCB mounted control transformers supplying multiple regulators.
Incidentally, "triangulation" as a DF or interference-hunting methodology is, in my experience, both very overrated and very misunderstood. Unless you are in a more or less reflection (multipath) free environment, it's very difficult to get good bearings: calculating the interception of those bearings is trivial, but junk bearings yield junk results.
Since interference / jamming happens around (or at least is important around) people, this means most practical DF'ing is being done in urban and suburban environments where multipath can be an issue.
For cellular network operators, they know from the base station stats (RSSI, e.g.) which sector or sectors are being affected, and in most cases you can simply drive (or walk) the sector until you get close and have to hunt on foot (where triangulation is completely useless).
Just wonder is it possible to use some kind of synchronized array of transmitters distributed all around the base stations and transmitted signals in that way so their interference signal at base station location gives false position of the transmitter or just spamming it with a bunch of virtual transmitter positions to make it hard to find which one is real? Are such kind of jammers are used in practice?
There are a lot of "creative" approaches to jamming, but high-end direction finding systems (like the ones we make) can usually still DF people trying to use "creative" techniques. Generally speaking, for a jammer to be effective it has to be (a) loud, (b) wide, and (c) on, and all three of those things make jammers relatively easy to DF, regardless of how they are implemented. A weak signal with a low duty cycle that's only a few kHz wide is harder to DF, but it's also not an effective jammer.