Well, that's your choice of course. I own a few analog scopes myself, and also an old Link pc-based DSO, but I find myself using my Rigol DS1054Z every day and hardly ever fire up the analog scopes now, and haven't used the Link at all since I bought the Rigol.
In spite of the bugs, it's still a very useful piece of kit, looks and feels nice and certainly adds a lot of capability to my little "laboratory". I would still recommend this scope as a great buy for a first-time scope buyer who needs a DSO. (Even though I still think it's better to learn the basics of scoposcopy on a basic analog scope.)
I have confidence that Rigol will fix the bugs in firmware as time goes by; meanwhile, I know that most of the bugs I've found and heard about won't affect most users at the basic level.
If you are doing work that often really involves complicated setups that absolutely _must_ yield quantitatively correct results, then you'll have to save up for quite a while in order to be able to afford an advanced Keysight or LeCroy or Tektronix or similar model DSO. Under the principle that (almost) any scope is better than no scope at all... I'd still recommend the DS1054Z as a "first" DSO to the hobbyist on a modest budget. The chances of a hobbyist project being "shut down" by encountering a bug in the Rigol are probably pretty low.
TLDR: I'm pretty happy with my DS1054Z in spite of the bugs.