Hi Rob,QuoteReboot DSO, does the setting Inverted remain as default for the Print button ?
Just trying it out now - The setting "Image Style" in the save/recall menu was changed back to normal, after reboot.
EDIT:
Other menu settings ( acquire, trigger for example (tried them)) remains after reboot.As expected however I was asking about setting Inverted Print outputs as a User Default.
Maybe you haven't found that functionality yet.
To be honest, I don´t know what you mean with this exactly.
There´s no print menu or settings for the print button explicit available.
Save/Recall>Save>Type = Default (button) = Current (scope) settings.
Another strange thing:
As I played around with the image style thing, turning it to invert, and press reboot - after the reboot all usb connectivity got lost.
No flashdrive detection, no mouse detection…
Reboot again, nothing changes.
Shut it down, then turning on again - Ports will be detected…..
That happens to the usb root hub if you have a power fault, they dont turn back on until you hard cycle, look for ground loops but if not maybe faulty? I'd assume they would have one anyway like other products and especially considering its nature.. if not x_x
Frex, Are you the same Frex as an DIY Audio? If so I have been following your audio analyzer build. Awesome work.
I did receive my LA probe set from Saelig. They are quite nice but not $300.00 nice. Would have nice to get a little storage pouch.
I think I discovered the rule (or the symptom) of an upgraded SDS2000X+ becoming a 2354X+ (w/ 500MHz) or a 2504X+ model:
It's all in the S/N:
SDS2Pxxx3Rxxxx will turn into a 2354
SDS2Pxxx4Rxxxx will turn into a 2504
Mine is a 4R but turned into 2354, not 2504.
There goes the neighborhood. My hunch was wrong!
I think I discovered the rule (or the symptom) of an upgraded SDS2000X+ becoming a 2354X+ (w/ 500MHz) or a 2504X+ model:
It's all in the S/N:
SDS2Pxxx3Rxxxx will turn into a 2354
SDS2Pxxx4Rxxxx will turn into a 2504
Mine is a 4R but turned into 2354, not 2504.
There goes the neighborhood. My hunch was wrong!
Mine is a 4R and became a 2504 on simple bandwidth.txt rename
The name depends on the bandwidth.
200M 2204
350M 2354
500M 2504
This was not the first time happen, I´m quiet sure.
And another strange thing concerning saving screenshots on stick:
Example, you took the stick into the port, taking a screenshot, it will be "named" with 1, what makes sense, because it is the first.
Next shots will be 2,3,4, etc...
So far so good.
But this will going only when you leave the stick connected.
If you put the stick out ( because you want to transfer the pic to pc) and then back, the first pic will be overwrite without a request.
Tomorrow I´ll examine it more exactly.
Hmm...Maybe it´s time for a dedicated bug and missing features thread.
The name depends on the bandwidth.
200M 2204
350M 2354
500M 2504
In this model, not so!
I can confirm this happens if you reboot the scope, so i think its clear its keeping the value in ram and not looking at the usb stick at all before writing
By the way - as I now apparently own a 500MHz scope, what's the conclusion on which probes to get to match the bandwidth? Bang for buck, which do you guys recommend?
Hi,
Same question here, there are some cheap 500Mhz probes on the market- but they are what they are, cheap….
This could be interesting but until now, I didn´t find any offer like his description:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/siglent-sds2000x-plus-coming/msg2999752/?topicseen#msg2999752
My advice is not to bother with it.
I have a 1GHz scope and there is no practical difference between expensive 500Mhz Keysight probes and 350 MHz Testec probes (at 37 € per piece, TT-HF 212 13,5pF 10x).
In real life, most important parameter is probe tip capacitance.. And that will be large (10-14 pF) even for 500 MHz probes...
Passive probes bandwidth is measured by measuring terminated siggen, with effective source impedance of 25 Ohm.
It makes passive probes look "too optimistic".
Probing real life circuits (with higher impedance) will make your bandwidth defined with probe tip capacitance, not probe bandwidth.
If you want, save money and get active low capacitance probe. Testec TT-AF-1200 is 500-600€ new. And it has 1 MΩ, 3 pF input.
Many other active old used probes can be found too, with better specs.... Or use 50 Ohm coax and 10x 500/50Ohm passive probe for low impedance circuits..
Also, probes get damaged. If you really wish to buy "nicer" probes, use ones that came with scope initially, and with time, when they get damaged, buy other better ones if you feel need for upgrade..
It is easy to spend half of scope price for "better" probes and to get practically nothing in return...
Over 150-200 MHz even most expensive passive probes will be really bad...
Of course that's just my opinion.
what we need to find out is if a 500M key does kick a 350M into 500M and does the front end hold up?
Edit: After more looking around I saw that 750/1000 seems to be a generic thing they have going on.. but it did return as being in those modes so?
Also.. ran into this in another thread and it matches all my keys, this should full unlock anyone
https://repl.it/repls/GainsboroAlienatedText
what we need to find out is if a 500M key does kick a 350M into 500M and does the front end hold up?Why shouldn't it ?
Earlier in this thread the -3dB point has already been established as ~570 MHz for the 500 MHz option however at best on 2 channels only, one from each ADC.
what we need to find out is if a 500M key does kick a 350M into 500M and does the front end hold up?Why shouldn't it ?
Earlier in this thread the -3dB point has already been established as ~570 MHz for the 500 MHz option however at best on 2 channels only, one from each ADC.
Thats for the odd mystery of why there are a mix of 350 and 500s when pulling the bandwidth.txt file
I'd assume anyone that has a 500 marked one would go full on but does a 350?
If you want to unlock 5000X to 1 GHz you need to buy 500MHz ver.