Does anyone know if you can use Siglent's SAG1021I USB AWG module as a second (synchronized) AWG channel for the SDS2000X Plus? If anyone has both, then it would be cool if it were tested.
If it doesn't work, then they should really add it as an option.
Although I dearly miss one feature, which is 9 bit UART decoding.
It is available here: https://github.com/RudisElectronicsLab/RTB_SDS_DSOX_review
Many thanks, that is super useful!
Any chance you can create the pdf in a way that text in the main part of the document is selectable? It looks like the pages are exported as images..
it would be nice to be able to link the oscilloscope to the sigrok / salae logic analyzer software. but unfortunately i cannot see any of these scope(s) on the wiki's supported hardware list
https://sigrok.org/wiki/Supported_hardware#Oscilloscopes
ah thanks, didn't see it there. Also its supported some LeCroy oscilloscopes. And the R&S RTB2004
It's on the "Mixed Signal Devices" as supported listed: https://sigrok.org/wiki/Siglent_SDS2000X_series
What a great idea to use the HW/Frontend with a PC based analyzer, did not know this was possible.
That's the SDS2000X, not the X-plus. You had me all excited for about a minute!
I just added a pull request in Sigrok Pulseview to support the SDS2000X Plus series, feel free to test it and give feedback: https://github.com/sigrokproject/libsigrok/pull/176
The current sigrok version does not yet support the Plus - but look just a page back in this very thread:I just added a pull request in Sigrok Pulseview to support the SDS2000X Plus series, feel free to test it and give feedback: https://github.com/sigrokproject/libsigrok/pull/176
Any chance you can create the pdf in a way that text in the main part of the document is selectable? It looks like the pages are exported as images..
Hi,
As I did this measure:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/show-us-your-square-wave/msg4045285/#msg4045285
And compare it to the screenshot from the lecroy wr9054, what I don't quite like is the very squeezed display when using the stats function on the sds2k+.
Is it because of the lower resolution of the siglent (1024x600 vs 1280x XXX, I´ve forgotten it) ?
Or can it be optimized by lowering the font size....
And compare it to the screenshot from the lecroy wr9054, what I don't quite like is the very squeezed display when using the stats function on the sds2k+.
Is it because of the lower resolution of the siglent (1024x600 vs 1280x XXX, I´ve forgotten it) ?
Or can it be optimized by lowering the font size....
There is also problem of gestalt. When reading a text in some language, our brain has capability to correctly recognize what word it is even if some letters are smudged or not legible. Brain kind of recognizes it as a pattern. Captchas work that way.
So even if you cannot perfectly see all the details of the font (because it is too small) you will still recognize the words, especially after some practice.
But numbers are different. Numbers you need to see, clearly and unambiguously, each one. You need to see decimal point(comma), grouping, you need to see SI prefixes...
it would be nice to be able to link the oscilloscope to the sigrok / salae logic analyzer software. but unfortunately i cannot see any of these scope(s) on the wiki's supported hardware list
https://sigrok.org/wiki/Supported_hardware#Oscilloscopes
Thanks for noting, that was not intentional. I now uploaded a version that is text selectable (and it is updated as well ;-)
https://github.com/RudisElectronicsLab/RTB_SDS_DSOX_review
Regarding the dots mode issue:
There is no need to do any further tests on this level.
It is already confirmed, that the SDS2000X Plus behaves differently to e.g. an SDS6000. The latter doesn't do any re-positioning of the samples, no matter if x or sin(x)/x is selected. Still the measurements appear correct, even the ones related to the trigger position.
There might be a bug in the SDS2000X Plus trigger handling. Also the huge difference in waveform update speed seems implausible.
I'm in the process of investigating the issue right now, this requires lots of measurements, including waveform update speed under various conditions and settings, including automatic measurments, for both the SDS2000X Plus and the SDS6000. All this will take quite some time.
Today I´ve got the permission to order a scope and a currentprobe for our testfield and I did it.
Siglent SDS2104X-Plus and siglent CP5500....Cost more than fourtimes of the scope...
First register it into our equipment list, then sending away for calibration - without calibration, we´re not "allowed" to use it.