Depends, in many countries the use of the title engineer is protected
Hey. As this Batterizer unfolds more and more and more as a scam, I saw one claim which was still not debunked :QuoteFrankie RoohparvarChairman & Inventor, Holds over 500 US patents
That does not sound very plausible to me. It means you write one patent each and every week for 10 years.
Yeah. Let's google that :
... He used to work at Micron in a team and every random thought the team had was patented.
They're mostly junk though. ...
As if a bunch of startup guys can outdo the big hitters who've been perfecting boost converters for 50+ years?Hmm.. This is actually plausible. Startup guys can outdo the big hitters sometimes provided they do things right.
I think Bob underestimated the pluckiness of journalist Hannah Francis actually going to to the trouble to find and talk to several university experts...
I think 95% of this forum underestimated Hannah.
I'm still laughing at the comparisons of the Batteriser to the marketing of fake boner pills. Well done, Hannah.That was pretty funny!
I didn't read the FCC report, I really just looked at the pictures, but the frequency emissions appear to have been taken at a distance of 3 metres?
So what happens when its a matter of centimetres from the device its installed in?
I think Bob underestimated the pluckiness of journalist Hannah Francis actually going to to the trouble to find and talk to several university experts...I think 95% of this forum underestimated Hannah.
I also downloaded a brand new cell of the same make and model
They claimed initially that "every battery you ever threw away had as much as 80% of the capacity still remaining". This is clearly not the case, as we all knew of course. But the Roopedoopedoovarhar brothers and Co. keep saying that you can't refute their claims without actually having a Battery-iser to test, when that obviously isn't the case.
"sheep psychology"
I think 95% of this forum underestimated Hannah.
I didn't read the FCC report, I really just looked at the pictures, but the frequency emissions appear to have been taken at a distance of 3 metres?
So what happens when its a matter of centimetres from the device its installed in?FCC requires only 3 m for the tested class: http://www.interferencetechnology.com/radiated-emission-measurements-at-1351030-meters/
But I guess it wouldn't be much different in the centimeters range, because the Batterise is so small, but might depend on wires in the device etc., too. Of course, no problem for a 1k resistor
QuoteI also downloaded a brand new cell of the same make and model
I think we all would be more interested in your tele-transporter than a battery.
Nothing from the Batteroo Fan Boy (I'm starting to think he might be Roohparvar's little nephew perhaps?). Anyway, I'm just waiting for the "What would she know, she's just a journalist and you guys are all poopy heads!"
NIDA is a rather exclusive and well regarded organisation
Yes indeed. Many try and and don't make it in each year, let alone finish. If I really was a graduate of NIDA's full course I'd be a hell of a lot better on camera than I am, by maybe 10 orders of magnitude!
I'm sure, though, that the radiated emissions from any boost converter, especially something like a Batteriser would be significantly higher at, say 1.5 A than they are at 1.5 mA... Who knows what they'll actually be like in real world, typical operation and how they will affect operation when put into some random device that may well have even been intentionally designed without a switching power supply and are assuming it will have a nice, clean, DC battery supply...
Could someone that has been across all the claims, bs and fog of marketing-speak, please put together an easy to read matrix of claims vs actual posted/observed/claimed results?
Batteriser are welcome to contribute with evidence supported claims.
e.g FCC, UL, date, chemistry, technology, fansite claims on one edge, and responders/ refuters along the other - with results at the meeting points...
This will clearly reveal truths, doublespeak, viable science and straight out falsehoods in an easy to understand format... it's what Boob Ropahrvar should already have on his desk.
Adding to their arsenal.....
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/batteroo-adds-former-battery-company-technologist-environmental-advocate-to-advisory-board-300145134.html
"I have been pleasantly surprised at the depth of understanding of the Roohparvar brothers regarding the Batteriser development,"
While their approach can work for any type of battery, the alkaline cell is particularly sensitive because of its steeply decreasing voltage during discharge. The battery industry has never clearly explained this fact to the consumer, but battery experts have been well aware of the problem and the great waste encountered, especially when devices use relatively high cut-off voltages.
"Given the ability of Batteriser to significantly reduce battery discards, the savings to both the environment and people's wallets is enormous,"
Batteriser, currently the only device of its kind, has been tested and proven compatible on a variety of battery-operated home and office gadgets, including wireless keyboards, noise cancelling headphones, Xbox and Wii controllers, TV remote controls, walkie-talkies, digital scales, electric toothbrushes, toys, portable radios, flashlights, and blood pressure monitors.