OMG, how cluelesss are these people?I love their experts's "workbench". Totally clean and littered with tools what are obviously fresh out of the packet and unused.
Look at that scope, it's hooked up to the test signal. That's probably the worst probe compensation I've ever seen.
Dave, do not waste time debunking this BS.
Dave, do not waste time debunking this BS.No, please do!
(You'll need one of those monkeys, maybe somebody can find where they sell them and post a link.)
They should have added their product to those empty batteries that run instantaneously below the 0.9V when activated in the test and then....... oh no the monkey still does not operate even with their magic smoke product FAIL
Dave, do not waste time debunking this BS.
I don't know whether to throughly destory this video
I don't know whether to throughly destory this video
You know you want to...
They need to respond to criticism somehow and if facts don't work, nonsense is almost as effective. Most people can't follow the technical arguments anyway so it comes down to which authority you trust most and people usually believe in the guy with a suit...
They showed their hand in a classic case of this by looking at my Linkedin profile & comparing their PhD's, which because they are more qualified, of course makes them right
They must know what they are doing, they already have prototype devices and it would be obvious when they test them that they don't work. And if they actually have real PhD's in electrical engineering and have been able to develop these tiny converters there is no way they don't understand Ohm's law at least.
At the same time they have spent all this money on a slick website, all those actors
C'mon Dave. Just give us the facts. Why did the monkey work down to a much lower voltage with a power supply than it did with batteries? Is their claim wrong? Does the internal resistance of the battery have no bearing?
I don't know whether to throughly destory this video
You know you want to...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4zjWynjEo
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-5RLfvy8XI[/url]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rkfdm8soHyU[/url]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP2kuEzySP8[/url]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4_XvJaQO34[/url]
Isn't knowingly false promiseing and selling a potentiell dangerous product (lets be a little bit keen) a little bit illegal?
What does Duracel say that teire design get used in a fraud?
C'mon Dave. Just give us the facts. Why did the monkey work down to a much lower voltage with a power supply than it did with batteries? Is their claim wrong? Does the internal resistance of the battery have no bearing?
Getting a mob of your fans stirred up is not the way to respond. Play a straight bat.
C'mon Dave. Just give us the facts. Why did the monkey work down to a much lower voltage with a power supply than it did with batteries? Is their claim wrong? Does the internal resistance of the battery have no bearing?
No. You basically didn't comprehend that I think the best strategy Dave can use to counter the claims these people make is to play a straight bat and fend off the claims they make without additional comment.
I dont quite understand who the target audience is in regards to the toy monkey clips.