The reason why Batteroo choose the Vivitar camera
https://twitter.com/GoBatteroo/status/816368105681289216
They chose that shitty camera because it is a "Best seller on Amazon"? As far as I can tell from a quick browse on Amazon, that statement is utter bollocks.
The reason why Batteroo choose the Vivitar camera
https://twitter.com/GoBatteroo/status/816368105681289216
They chose that shitty camera because it is a "Best seller on Amazon"? As far as I can tell from a quick browse on Amazon, that statement is utter bollocks.
"We chose that model of the Vivitar camera because it's a best seller on Amazon."
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
Or maybe "Batteriser - The Ultimate Product FAIL"
It's now clearly evident that there basically is no redeeming feature of the Batteriser, it's as bad or worse than we expected. So why not simply highlight the top 10(?) ways in which it fails?
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
Or maybe "Batteriser - The Ultimate Product FAIL"
It's now clearly evident that there basically is no redeeming feature of the Batteriser, it's as bad or worse than we expected. So why not simply highlight the top 10(?) ways in which it fails?
Lack of robustness
Limited product fit
Limited increased performance (the failed train test)
Claimed increased battery life is actually the opposite (the MP3 and other tests)
No miracle performance with their customised IC, it's just a very ordinary boost converter.
Pretty awful ripple results.
Overheating (TBC)
Not to mention the multitude of ridiculous claims, their change of direction & backpedaling, the rigged GPS test, and maybe a similarly rigged camera test now.
And I haven't even thought about that list...
And don't forget to test it in probes the monkey
And don't forget to test it in probes the monkey
Has anyone noticed something funny in their video? There are two monkeys in their video but they do not test them?
The reason why Batteroo choose the Vivitar camera
https://twitter.com/GoBatteroo/status/816368105681289216
They chose that shitty camera because it is a "Best seller on Amazon"? As far as I can tell from a quick browse on Amazon, that statement is utter bollocks.
"We chose that model of the Vivitar camera because it's a best seller on Amazon." Come on, let's just call that what it is: A blatant lie. This is one of the worst cameras out there and rated incredibly badly on Amazon, and very difficult to still purchase because it is discontinued. Of course, how it is rated on Amazon is irrelevant to how Batteroo's perform in it, but why are they so blatantly dishonest all the time? I would have dropped this whole Batteroo debacle ages ago if they were just honest. Also, why be so dishonest when a quick look at Amazon shows the truth in seconds?
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
The reason why Batteroo choose the Vivitar camera
https://twitter.com/GoBatteroo/status/816368105681289216
I wonder why it was deleted?
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
Or maybe "Batteriser - The Ultimate Product FAIL"
It's now clearly evident that there basically is no redeeming feature of the Batteriser, it's as bad or worse than we expected. So why not simply highlight the top 10(?) ways in which it fails?
Lack of robustness
Limited product fit
Limited increased performance (the failed train test)
Claimed increased battery life is actually the opposite (the MP3 and other tests)
No miracle performance with their customised IC, it's just a very ordinary boost converter.
Pretty awful ripple results.
Overheating (TBC)
Not to mention the multitude of ridiculous claims, their change of direction & backpedaling, the rigged GPS test, and maybe a similarly rigged camera test now.
And I haven't even thought about that list...
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
Yes it is as big a fail as expected yet still they carry on with website updates, the contest, new videos.
What is the end game? I thought they would come to their senses, do their indiegogo backers a favour by refunding instead of shipping and call it a day.
Do they seriously think they are going find a buyer for the company? Do they seriously think they will get big orders from the likes of Walmart? Will dribs and drabs sold from their web site sustain anything? Are they just trying to shift the rest whatever sized batch of product they had built? Are they trying to get some more money from their VC backers?
You would have be be insane to put these on the shelves for general consumption, half would come back with doesn't fit, doesn't work, broke, or burnt me.
To me why they are carrying on now is more of a puzzle than why they started 18 months ago.
Has this reached the "biggest thread" mark yet? What's the other one?
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
Or maybe "Batteriser - The Ultimate Product FAIL"
It's now clearly evident that there basically is no redeeming feature of the Batteriser, it's as bad or worse than we expected. So why not simply highlight the top 10(?) ways in which it fails?
Lack of robustness
Limited product fit
Limited increased performance (the failed train test)
Claimed increased battery life is actually the opposite (the MP3 and other tests)
No miracle performance with their customised IC, it's just a very ordinary boost converter.
Pretty awful ripple results.
Overheating (TBC)
Not to mention the multitude of ridiculous claims, their change of direction & backpedaling, the rigged GPS test, and maybe a similarly rigged camera test now.
And I haven't even thought about that list...
Maybe before that conclusion vid, one more in the interim could be the in depth bench testing? Just a suggestion.
I'm thinking my next video should be simply "The Top X Ways The Batteriser FAILED"
Or maybe "Batteriser - The Ultimate Product FAIL"
It's now clearly evident that there basically is no redeeming feature of the Batteriser, it's as bad or worse than we expected. So why not simply highlight the top 10(?) ways in which it fails?
Lack of robustness
Limited product fit
Limited increased performance (the failed train test)
Claimed increased battery life is actually the opposite (the MP3 and other tests)
No miracle performance with their customised IC, it's just a very ordinary boost converter.
Pretty awful ripple results.
Overheating (TBC)
Not to mention the multitude of ridiculous claims, their change of direction & backpedaling, the rigged GPS test, and maybe a similarly rigged camera test now.
And I haven't even thought about that list...
Maybe before that conclusion vid, one more in the interim could be the in depth bench testing? Just a suggestion.
My plan has been two more videos. On for the technical measurements, and one final conclusion video.
But many people are saying not to bother with any more Batteriser videos, just don't give them the oxygen.
Do they seriously think they are going find a buyer for the company?
Do they seriously think they will get big orders from the likes of Walmart?
Will dribs and drabs sold from their web site sustain anything?
Are they just trying to shift the rest whatever sized batch of product they had built?
Are they trying to get some more money from their VC backers?
I do wish someone can duplicate the test but it will be expensive and hard. I will contribute to the cause. Maybe someone could start a Kickstarter on this. I think there are enough people here to raise a couple hundred to do this (if there is a volunteer to build the pressers)
Why would you need a crowdfunding for the button pusher?
Overheating confirmed....
Finally definitive proof, direct from Batteroo.
Vivitar digital cameras 3 x AAA batteries.
Set up to take photos in forced flash mode. One pic every 10 seconds.
The claim is 172 pics without sleeve, 616 with.
edit to add: The flash does seem to stop working at 172 pics, but the camera looks like it is still taking pictures up to about 420.