They are engaged in damage control. Disabling comments, deleting comments are telltale signs of panic.
They are engaged in damage control. Disabling comments, deleting comments are telltale signs of panic.But why should they panic now?
Their goal was to raise $30,000 and they are now at $ 273,150
So, no matter what they do, they will have a quarter million in their pocket in a coupe of days.
They are engaged in damage control. Disabling comments, deleting comments are telltale signs of panic.
Their goal was to raise $30,000
If I'm throwing away batteries with unknown capacity left, it's because I'm going away, and want new batteries in my digital camera, or I've removed them from a device that I haven't used, or don't plan to use, for a while, and don't want to risk them leaking...
Other than that, they get left in devices till they'll no longer function, at which point the cells are depleted!
Bollocks to that Dave! Keep prodding them until they admit defeat!
It gets tiring, like debating young earth creationists. It's fun for a while and then you just have to give up.
I won't get around to doing a responsive video for quite a while on this one (if I have the enthusiasm after watching it), too much else going on.
It would be great if others could also pick up the baton. I can't be the only one in town doing the public video debunking.
Anyway, they got the funds to start production. Max. 10% - 20% of the customers will bother asking for a refund, so they will still have the 80% - 90% profit in their pockets.
There is no way you could do a 40min video like that, showing your face without believing for even 1ns on what you are saying.
I really hope that Dave makes a response video to this. O0 I know at this point it is a waste of his time, but it would be so entertaining.
And thanks Dave for all that you have done already.
edit: they disabled ratings and comments on videos
I really hope that Dave makes a response video to this. O0 I know at this point it is a waste of his time, but it would be so entertaining.
And thanks Dave for all that you have done already.Couldn't you make a response (like the one for over unity)? It will become too personal and arduous for a single person busting their claims.
What about the number of Up/Down thumbs?
I start to think that he beleive that as the batteratruc is forcing the output voltage to 1.5V, that why "constant current" form a rectangle, and why only a rectangle is the only way to calculate the remaining power.
They are engaged in damage control. Disabling comments, deleting comments are telltale signs of panic.But why should they panic now?
Their goal was to raise $30,000 and they are now at $ 273,150
So, no matter what they do, they will have a quarter million in their pocket in a coupe of days.They're crapping themselves because their backers, SK Telecom, are pissed. The goal isn't to make Batterisers. The goal is a second round of funding followed by an IPO. As of now, that isn't possible. Their retail channel partners have obviously abandoned them.
And that money from IndieGoGo is more of a liability than anything. They're better off giving refunds at this point. They're in this never never land of having orders and fair bit of them, but not enough orders to not tape a dollar bill or three to every order. No CM is going to buy and stock the MOQs necessary for the Batteriser's price point without Batteroo taking liability. And Batteroo doesn't have the assets to do it themselves.
I really hope that Dave makes a response video to this. O0 I know at this point it is a waste of his time, but it would be so entertaining.
And thanks Dave for all that you have done already.Couldn't you make a response (like the one for over unity)? It will become too personal and arduous for a single person busting their claims.
Yes, got to be careful not to make this personal. It's not personal of course, but it can certainly come across that way.
I've got an idea for a response video.
As I understand it (still haven't watch it all) their major claim now (they keep moving the goal posts, it's so hard to keep up) is that pulse currents cause product dropouts due to IR.
So once again show if the Batteriser, by demonstration, is suitable for all products, or just a few edge cases.
And of course (as I understand it), they haven't demonstrated that the Batteriser does anything to actually help dips like this anyway. It's all just whiteboard hand waving.
I start to think that he beleive that as the batteratruc is forcing the output voltage to 1.5V, that why "constant current" form a rectangle, and why only a rectangle is the only way to calculate the remaining power.
I've watched that bit and understand what he's trying to say here (that with CC (with some error) (and CW) you can just read the % remaining from the X axis), and what's he's trying to say is essentially right. But it's a poor way to explain it.
Hum, you mean that for example, if with at a specified constant current or power, the deplete in 100 hour (to make thing simpler) , when we are at 50h of use, basically, it remain 50% of the battery?
Then at 90h it only remain 10%?
Hum make sense in a way