Was chatting with an investment advisor yesterday and they said that some of the large (international) funds they dealt with were busy moving holdings across to China, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam from the US.
As far as I'm concerned the only Trump's ally is Russia and perhaps Belarus.
Was the goal to harm US allies?
Was chatting with an investment advisor yesterday and they said that some of the large (international) funds they dealt with were busy moving holdings across to China, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam from the US.Nice insider news!!
That means they are afraid of their assets being frozen. Correct assumption?
If the assumption above is correct, why are they afraid of their assets being frozen?
Lavrov said it best, let me quote him...
QuoteLavrov said it best, let me quote him...
Lavrov is one of the most unreliable sources imaginable. Show him daylight and he'll insist it is actually night if that suits Putin's purposes.
Was the goal to harm US allies?
This has certainly harmed my retirement savings.
In the 80's there was no China,
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
There was no China as an economic powerhouse is what they were getting at.
You have to remember just how meteoric China's rise has been: as late as the 1960s, which is really not all that long ago, it was still a largely agrarian society, with a large part of the population that could be rightly called "peasants".
Nowadays that's just a very stupid and ignorant slur on the Chinese people, as J.D. Vance recently showed us.
I see China more than anything as the modern economic success story.
does anyone know how or if these tariffs affected or will affect the UK street lamp industry (lower cost brands)?
The cost expressed in human health & lives and destruction of China's environment is huge (understatement). That is going to backfire at the Chinese big time.
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
There was no China as an economic powerhouse is what they were getting at.
You have to remember just how meteoric China's rise has been: as late as the 1960s, which is really not all that long ago, it was still a largely agrarian society, with a large part of the population that could be rightly called "peasants".
Nowadays that's just a very stupid and ignorant slur on the Chinese people, as J.D. Vance recently showed us.
I see China more than anything as the modern economic success story.I'm not sure you can call it a success story. The cost expressed in human health & lives and destruction of China's environment is huge (understatement). That is going to backfire at the Chinese big time.
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
There was no China as an economic powerhouse is what they were getting at.
You have to remember just how meteoric China's rise has been: as late as the 1960s, which is really not all that long ago, it was still a largely agrarian society, with a large part of the population that could be rightly called "peasants".
Nowadays that's just a very stupid and ignorant slur on the Chinese people, as J.D. Vance recently showed us.
I see China more than anything as the modern economic success story.I'm not sure you can call it a success story. The cost expressed in human health & lives and destruction of China's environment is huge (understatement). That is going to backfire at the Chinese big time.
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
There was no China as an economic powerhouse is what they were getting at.
You have to remember just how meteoric China's rise has been: as late as the 1960s, which is really not all that long ago, it was still a largely agrarian society, with a large part of the population that could be rightly called "peasants".
Nowadays that's just a very stupid and ignorant slur on the Chinese people, as J.D. Vance recently showed us.
I see China more than anything as the modern economic success story.I'm not sure you can call it a success story. The cost expressed in human health & lives and destruction of China's environment is huge (understatement). That is going to backfire at the Chinese big time.
Success implies comparing X0 with X1, not comparing X with Y.
Economic success means nothing if the end result is a country where people can't live in.
Yeah, like the surgery was a success but the patient has diedEconomic success means nothing if the end result is a country where people can't live in.
QuoteIn the 80's there was no China,you sure about that as they claim to have been around for a few thousand years,and it certainly weren't japanese takeaways we'd have as a special treat in the 70's
There was no China as an economic powerhouse is what they were getting at.
You have to remember just how meteoric China's rise has been: as late as the 1960s, which is really not all that long ago, it was still a largely agrarian society, with a large part of the population that could be rightly called "peasants".
Nowadays that's just a very stupid and ignorant slur on the Chinese people, as J.D. Vance recently showed us.
I see China more than anything as the modern economic success story.I'm not sure you can call it a success story. The cost expressed in human health & lives and destruction of China's environment is huge (understatement). That is going to backfire at the Chinese big time.
Success implies comparing X0 with X1, not comparing X with Y.Yeah, like the surgery was a success but the patient has diedEconomic success means nothing if the end result is a country where people can't live in.
Yeah, like the surgery was a success but the patient has diedEconomic success means nothing if the end result is a country where people can't live in.
Your concern is noted but is totally misplaced.
China is far, far away from that condition. Despite living under an authoritarian regime, people there are not in any kind of revolt against their society, which they would be if things were as bad as you're trying to convince us they are.
Yeah, like the surgery was a success but the patient has diedEconomic success means nothing if the end result is a country where people can't live in.
Your concern is noted but is totally misplaced.
China is far, far away from that condition. Despite living under an authoritarian regime, people there are not in any kind of revolt against their society, which they would be if things were as bad as you're trying to convince us they are.
Yeah, like the surgery was a success but the patient has diedEconomic success means nothing if the end result is a country where people can't live in.
Your concern is noted but is totally misplaced.
China is far, far away from that condition. Despite living under an authoritarian regime, people there are not in any kind of revolt against their society, which they would be if things were as bad as you're trying to convince us they are.
I suggest you read some (of the far too many) reports about what the Han Chinese are doing to their minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet.
Start with https://www.state.gov/office-to-monitor-and-combat-trafficking-in-persons/releases/2025/01/uyghur-forced-labor-prevention-act-uflpa-fact-sheet
Very very ugly.
Yes, I know all about that. I think most people do by now.
I still stand by my statements. Overall, most Chinese (except, of course, the oppressed minorities) are pretty satisfied with life there.
One could cast similar kinds of aspersion even on the United States of Amnesia, which still has major problems with racism as demonstrated by continued excessive use of force cases (including outright murder) against black and brown people, despite our overwhelming (well, formerly overwhelming) economic successes.
I'd say that's pretty damn ugly, wouldn't you?
Yes, I know all about that. I think most people do by now.
I still stand by my statements. Overall, most Chinese (except, of course, the oppressed minorities) are pretty satisfied with life there.
One could cast similar kinds of aspersion even on the United States of Amnesia, which still has major problems with racism as demonstrated by continued excessive use of force cases (including outright murder) against black and brown people, despite our overwhelming (well, formerly overwhelming) economic successes.
I'd say that's pretty damn ugly, wouldn't you?
What this has to do with tariffs?
Start with https://www.state.gov/office-to-monitor-and-combat-trafficking-in-persons/releases/2025/01/uyghur-forced-labor-prevention-act-uflpa-fact-sheet

What would it take for people to revolt?

One could cast similar kinds of aspersion even on the United States of Amnesia, which still has major problems with racism as demonstrated by continued excessive use of force cases (including outright murder) against black and brown people, despite our overwhelming (well, formerly overwhelming) economic successes.