Almost forgot......
One broken one working... just in today
the PM2527 is hugh, did not expect that
I was looking into the Creality CR10-MAX, so I could print a bezel in one go. Has a self leveling bed, improved heating bed etc. Oddly enough, it does not list ABS as possible materials. So now, I'm not sure what to do...
Guess I should be happy we don't have something like that in Germany. At least I'm not aware of it.https://www.vebeg.de/web/de/start/index.htm
Guess I should be happy we don't have something like that in Germany. At least I'm not aware of it.https://www.vebeg.de/web/de/start/index.htm
Somehow I knew this was coming ...
There isn't much TE, and no trace of of any price. No minimum bid, nothing. Or have I gone blind?
Still happy.
the MS8910 is really cheap (25$) and easy to find. It's mostly a capacitor and ohm meter put together.
The MS8911 on the other hand is a real LCR meter with 4 test frequencies (up to 10Khz). It's harder to find since it look like Mastech is the OEM of other brands and probably have trade agreement with their clients. Like the Global Specialities LCR-58, exactly the same product for more than twice the price (105$ on digikey).
I was watching a video of the ST-5 and MS8911. Seriously I don't see a lot a difference in speed and resolution. Both take around 2sec to take a measurement. Anyway, will see when I receive mine.
Do you deal with them directly or through fleabay? Not having dealt with them before, I went through fleaBay and made an offer which was instantly rejected. My offer was a bit on the low side. I assume a seller can set a reserve price in fleabay for that sort of thing? Probably I will sit back and wait for a better deal to come along...
Via Ebay mostly since they don't post their new stuff elsewhere. They asked me if I wanted to do the tour of their warehouse at some point and just said no since I was buying too much already and was trying to limit my TEA consumption
The hammer analogy is a bad one (ie. apples and onions comparison), also need to differentiate ratio between design issue or maintenance fail thats caused the non-combat losses.
Why? Both essentially designed to pound something flat or try to reduce it to its component parts i.e. Widlarize. I don't really see the need to go any deeper than "This is a very expensive way to destroy things, and it gets itself destroyed while in the toolbag more often than it manages to destroy something else when deployed".
The original point was "104 kills, 0 combat losses". The counterpoint was 175 non-combat loses. With any other tool people wouldn't say "it's very good at it's job" they'd say "It's junk, it breaks itself more often than it breaks the things it is designed to break". Just because it's a war plane people glamorize it, when viewed as a system or a tool to do a specific job (deny the enemy use of the airspace) it fails expensively more often than it (expensively) finally does its job. From a utilitarian point of view it is an expensive failure; that it is perhaps the best in its class over its whole 44 year history just means that the other tools in this task space are even junkier.
Finally I got my new toy.
Nice one. I'll get this one in August / September, I hope.
Creality CR-6 SE Leveling-free DIY 3D Printer Kit @ Kickstarter
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1001939425/creality-cr-6-se-leveling-free-diy-3d-printer-kit/
Finally I got my new toy.
very nice bro!
i see you have your octoPi on standby already
Not in standby already working with, I just need a case and a Camera to have the full setup.
3D printing is really interesting topic and I alway wanted to give it a try .
Currently I'm fighting with with the setup/calibration of the printer which are more complicated as expected.
Leveling the bat is a chellence, but once done its okey, i use glass/mirror as a base, it sticks very good, no glu needed.
i advice you to print an heattower, to find teh best temprature for your fillemend, i found i needed toprint a lot higher then on the spool was mentioned.
on my youtube channel i have some links about this tower...i made prob. all your mistakes too ;-)
Tony
Leveling is a nightmare. Even is the printer is equipped with a sensor, the compensation is not working well or the resolution of the step motors is not high enough.
I will have to do the leveling with a dial gauge ( like I'm doing it with my milling machine) to get better results. Doing it with a filling gauge is just suboptimal.
I was looking into the Creality CR10-MAX, so I could print a bezel in one go. Has a self leveling bed, improved heating bed etc. Oddly enough, it does not list ABS as possible materials. So now, I'm not sure what to do...
I'll grab one once it's being palmed off on their UK ebay store on a sale day
The hammer analogy is a bad one (ie. apples and onions comparison), also need to differentiate ratio between design issue or maintenance fail thats caused the non-combat losses.
Why? Both essentially designed to pound something flat or try to reduce it to its component parts i.e. Widlarize. I don't really see the need to go any deeper than "This is a very expensive way to destroy things, and it gets itself destroyed while in the toolbag more often than it manages to destroy something else when deployed".
The original point was "104 kills, 0 combat losses". The counterpoint was 175 non-combat loses. With any other tool people wouldn't say "it's very good at it's job" they'd say "It's junk, it breaks itself more often than it breaks the things it is designed to break". Just because it's a war plane people glamorize it, when viewed as a system or a tool to do a specific job (deny the enemy use of the airspace) it fails expensively more often than it (expensively) finally does its job. From a utilitarian point of view it is an expensive failure; that it is perhaps the best in its class over its whole 44 year history just means that the other tools in this task space are even junkier.
Guess I should be happy we don't have something like that in Germany. At least I'm not aware of it.https://www.vebeg.de/web/de/start/index.htm
Somehow I knew this was coming ...
There isn't much TE, and no trace of of any price. No minimum bid, nothing. Or have I gone blind?
Still happy.
It seems to be a blind-bid system. Put in your bid and wait until the end date to see if you were the highest bidder.
McBryce.
I was looking into the Creality CR10-MAX, so I could print a bezel in one go. Has a self leveling bed, improved heating bed etc. Oddly enough, it does not list ABS as possible materials. So now, I'm not sure what to do...
I have the CR10S Pro (the max is the same printer just bigger) with all the last improvement including self-leveling bed, which is not completely automated.
You need to do the leveling manually anyway and better it is better is the result. The self leveling is just a way to do minimum compensation. ABS is definitively supported.
The fact you don't acknowledge the true purpose of these aircraft isn't THEIR shortcoming; it's yours, old friend.
And remember; unlike a hammer, if the operator drops one of THOSE on the ground it's done for.
I hate all of you! I can't afford a 3DP right now.